Chládková Jirina, Havlínová Zuzana, Chyba Tomás, Krcmová Irena, Chládek Jaroslav
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University in Prague, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
J Asthma. 2008 Nov;45(9):820-6. doi: 10.1080/02770900802312582.
Current guidelines recommend the single-breath measurement of fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FE(NO)) at the expiratory flow rate of 50 mL/s as a gold standard. The time profile of exhaled FE(NO) consists of a washout phase followed by a plateau phase with a stable concentration. This study performed measurements of FE(NO) using a chemiluminescence analyzer Ecomedics CLD88sp and an electrochemical monitor NIOX MINO in 82 children and adolescents (44 males) from 4.9 to 18.7 years of age with corticosteroid-treated allergic rhinitis (N = 58) and/or asthma (N = 59). Duration of exhalation was 6 seconds for children less than 12 years of age and 10 seconds for older children. The first aim was to compare the evaluation of FE(NO)-time profiles from Ecomedics by its software in fixed intervals of 7 to 10 seconds (older children) and 2 to 4 seconds (younger children) since the start of exhalation (method A) with the guideline-based analysis of plateau concentrations at variable time intervals (method B). The second aim was to assess the between-analyzer agreement. In children over 12 years of age, the median ratio of FE(NO) concentrations of 1.00 (95% CI: 0.99-1.02) indicated an excellent agreement between the methods A and B. Compared with NIOX MINO, the Ecomedics results were higher by 11% (95% CI: 1-22) (method A) and 14% (95% CI: 4-26) (method B), respectively. In children less than 12 years of age, the FE(NO) concentrations obtained by the method B were 34% (95% CI: 21-48) higher and more reproducible (p < 0.02) compared to the method A. The Ecomedics results of the method A were 11% lower (95% CI: 2-20) than NIOX MINO concentrations while the method B gave 21% higher concentrations (95% CI: 9-35). We conclude that in children less than 12 years of age, the guideline-based analysis of FE(NO)-time profiles from Ecomedics at variable times obtains FE(NO) concentrations that are higher and more reproducible than those from the fixed interval of 2 to 4 seconds and higher than NIOX MINO concentrations obtained during a short exhalation (6 seconds). The Ecomedics FE(NO) concentrations of children more than 12 years of age calculated in the interval of 7 to 10 seconds represent plateau values and agree well with NIOX MINO results obtained during a standard 10-second exhalation.
当前指南推荐,以呼气流量为50 mL/s时单次呼气一氧化氮分数浓度(FE(NO))的测量作为金标准。呼出FE(NO)的时间曲线包括一个清除期,随后是一个浓度稳定的平台期。本研究使用化学发光分析仪Ecomedics CLD88sp和电化学监测仪NIOX MINO,对82名4.9至18.7岁接受皮质类固醇治疗的变应性鼻炎(N = 58)和/或哮喘(N = 59)的儿童及青少年(44名男性)进行了FE(NO)测量。12岁以下儿童呼气持续时间为6秒,年龄较大儿童为10秒。第一个目的是比较Ecomedics软件在呼气开始后以7至10秒(年龄较大儿童)和2至4秒(年龄较小儿童)的固定时间间隔(方法A)对FE(NO)时间曲线的评估,与基于指南的可变时间间隔平台浓度分析(方法B)。第二个目的是评估分析仪之间的一致性。在12岁以上儿童中,FE(NO)浓度的中位数比值为1.00(95%CI:0.99 - 1.02),表明方法A和B之间具有良好的一致性。与NIOX MINO相比,Ecomedics的结果分别高出11%(95%CI:1 - 22)(方法A)和14%(95%CI:4 - 26)(方法B)。在12岁以下儿童中,与方法A相比,方法B获得的FE(NO)浓度高出34%(95%CI:21 - 48)且重复性更好(p < 0.02)。方法A的Ecomedics结果比NIOX MINO浓度低11%(95%CI:2 - 20),而方法B的浓度高出了21%(95%CI:9 - 35)。我们得出结论,在12岁以下儿童中,基于指南对Ecomedics的FE(NO)时间曲线进行可变时间分析所获得的FE(NO)浓度,比2至4秒的固定时间间隔分析所获得的浓度更高且重复性更好,也高于短时间(6秒)呼气时获得的NIOX MINO浓度。12岁以上儿童在7至10秒间隔内计算出的Ecomedics FE(NO)浓度代表平台值,与标准10秒呼气时获得的NIOX MINO结果吻合良好。