McKinney Christy M, Caetano Raul, Harris Theodore Robert, Ebama Malembe S
University of Texas Houston School of Public Health, Dallas, TX 75390-9128, USA.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2009 Jan;33(1):169-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00825.x. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
We examined the relation between alcohol outlet density (the number of alcohol outlets per capita by zip code) and male-to-female partner violence (MFPV) or female-to-male partner violence (FMPV). We also investigated whether binge drinking or the presence of alcohol-related problems altered the relationship between alcohol outlet density and MFPV or FMPV.
We linked individual and couple sociodemographic and behavioral data from a 1995 national population-based sample of 1,597 couples to alcohol outlet data and 1990 US Census sociodemographic information. We used logistic regression for survey data to estimate unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios between alcohol outlet density and MFPV or FMPV along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and p-values. We used a design-based Wald test to derive a p-value for multiplicative interaction to assess the role of binge drinking and alcohol-related problems.
In adjusted analysis, an increase of one alcohol outlet per 10,000 persons was associated with a 1.03-fold increased risk of MFPV (p-value for linear trend = 0.01) and a 1.011-fold increased risk of FMPV (p-value for linear trend = 0.48). An increase of 10 alcohol outlets per 10,000 persons was associated with 34% and 12% increased risk of MFPV and FMPV respectively, though the CI for the association with FMPV was compatible with no increased risk. The relationship between alcohol outlet density and MFPV was stronger among couples reporting alcohol-related problems than those reporting no problems (p-value for multiplicative interaction = 0.01).
We found that as alcohol outlet density increases so does the risk of MFPV and that this relationship may differ for couples who do and do not report alcohol-related problems. Given that MFPV accounts for the majority of injuries related to intimate partner violence, policy makers may wish to carefully consider the potential benefit of limiting alcohol outlet density to reduce MFPV and its adverse consequences.
我们研究了酒类销售点密度(按邮政编码划分的人均酒类销售点数量)与男性对女性伴侣暴力(MFPV)或女性对男性伴侣暴力(FMPV)之间的关系。我们还调查了暴饮或存在与酒精相关的问题是否改变了酒类销售点密度与MFPV或FMPV之间的关系。
我们将1995年基于全国人口的1597对夫妇样本中的个人和夫妇社会人口统计学及行为数据与酒类销售点数据以及1990年美国人口普查社会人口统计学信息相链接。我们使用逻辑回归分析调查数据,以估计酒类销售点密度与MFPV或FMPV之间未调整和调整后的比值比以及95%置信区间(CIs)和p值。我们使用基于设计的Wald检验得出乘法交互作用的p值,以评估暴饮和与酒精相关问题的作用。
在调整分析中,每10000人增加一个酒类销售点与MFPV风险增加1.03倍相关(线性趋势p值 = 0.01),与FMPV风险增加1.011倍相关(线性趋势p值 = 0.48)。每10000人增加10个酒类销售点分别与MFPV和FMPV风险增加34%和12%相关,尽管与FMPV关联的置信区间与无风险增加相符。报告有与酒精相关问题的夫妇中,酒类销售点密度与MFPV之间的关系比报告无问题的夫妇更强(乘法交互作用p值 = 0.01)。
我们发现,随着酒类销售点密度增加,MFPV风险也增加,并且这种关系在报告有与酒精相关问题和无相关问题的夫妇中可能有所不同。鉴于MFPV占亲密伴侣暴力相关伤害的大多数,政策制定者可能希望仔细考虑限制酒类销售点密度以降低MFPV及其不良后果的潜在益处。