Suppr超能文献

阿尔茨海默病评定量表认知部分(ADAS-Cog)的施测与评分差异

Administration and scoring variance on the ADAS-Cog.

作者信息

Connor Donald J, Sabbagh Marwan N

机构信息

Cleo Roberts Center for Clinical Research, Sun Health Research Institute, Sun City, AZ 85351, USA.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis. 2008 Nov;15(3):461-4. doi: 10.3233/jad-2008-15312.

Abstract

The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) is the most commonly used primary outcome instrument in clinical trials for treatments of dementia. Variations in forms, administration procedures and scoring rules, along with rater turnover and intra-rater drift may decrease the reliability of the instrument. A survey of possible variations in the ADAS-Cog was administered to 26 volunteer raters at a clinical trials meeting. Results indicate notable protocol variations in the forms used, administration procedures, and scoring rules. Since change over time is used to determine treatment effect in clinical trials, standardizing the instrument's ambiguities and addressing common problems will greatly increase the instrument's reliability and thereby enhance its sensitivity to treatment effects.

摘要

阿尔茨海默病评估量表 - 认知部分(ADAS-Cog)是痴呆症治疗临床试验中最常用的主要结局指标工具。量表在形式、施测程序和评分规则方面存在差异,再加上评分者更替和评分者内部偏差,可能会降低该工具的可靠性。在一次临床试验会议上,对26名志愿者评分者进行了关于ADAS-Cog可能存在的差异的调查。结果表明,在使用的形式、施测程序和评分规则方面存在显著的方案差异。由于在临床试验中是通过随时间的变化来确定治疗效果的,因此规范该工具的模糊之处并解决常见问题将大大提高其可靠性,从而增强其对治疗效果的敏感性。

相似文献

6
What is the clinically relevant change on the ADAS-Cog?ADAS-Cog 的临床相关变化是什么?
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;83(2):171-3. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2011-300881. Epub 2011 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

8
LSOR: Longitudinally-Consistent Self-Organized Representation Learning.LSOR:纵向一致的自组织表征学习
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2023 Oct;14220:279-289. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-43907-0_27. Epub 2023 Oct 1.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验