• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者家庭与医院肺康复治疗的比较:一项西班牙多中心试验]

[Home vs hospital-based pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a Spanish multicenter trial].

作者信息

Güell María Rosa, de Lucas Pilar, Gáldiz Juan Bautista, Montemayor Teodoro, Rodríguez González-Moro José Miguel, Gorostiza Amaia, Ortega Francisco, Bellón José M, Guyatt Gordon

机构信息

Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, España.

出版信息

Arch Bronconeumol. 2008 Oct;44(10):512-8.

PMID:19006630
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of a simple home pulmonary rehabilitation program and an intensive hospital-based program in terms of the exercise tolerance and health-related quality of life (HRQL) of patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients in this prospective, multicenter trial were randomized to 2 groups to receive hospital or home pulmonary rehabilitation. Patients in both groups attended 2 informative sessions about the disease and 4 physical therapy sessions. Patients in the hospital group then carried out a structured exercise program while home group patients performed low intensity exercises at home without supervision.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were randomized to the hospital rehabilitation group and 23 to the home group. Both groups showed a similar improvement on the 6-minute walk test (mean difference, 8.7 m; P=.61). HRQOL measured with the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire also improved in both groups, but the change was greater on the emotional function domain in the hospital rehabilitation group (mean difference between groups, 0.58 on a scale for which the smallest clinically relevant difference is 0.5 points). The benefits were maintained in both groups 6 months after the programs ended.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the improvement in exercise tolerance achieved by COPD patients with an unsupervised home pulmonary rehabilitation program is similar to the gains of patients in an intensive hospital-based program. However, the hospital program afforded greater benefit on the HRQOL emotional function domain.

摘要

目的

比较简单的家庭肺康复计划与基于医院的强化康复计划对重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者运动耐量和健康相关生活质量(HRQL)的影响。

患者与方法

在这项前瞻性多中心试验中,患者被随机分为两组,分别接受医院或家庭肺康复治疗。两组患者均参加了2次关于该疾病的知识讲座和4次物理治疗课程。医院组患者随后进行结构化运动计划,而家庭组患者在家中进行低强度运动且无人监督。

结果

28例患者被随机分配至医院康复组,23例患者被分配至家庭组。两组在6分钟步行试验中均显示出相似的改善(平均差异为8.7米;P = 0.61)。使用慢性呼吸问卷测量的HRQOL在两组中也均有改善,但医院康复组在情感功能领域的变化更大(两组之间的平均差异为0.58,最小临床相关差异为0.5分的量表)。在计划结束6个月后,两组的益处均得以维持。

结论

本研究表明,COPD患者通过无监督的家庭肺康复计划所实现的运动耐量改善与基于医院的强化康复计划患者的改善相似。然而,医院康复计划在HRQOL情感功能领域带来了更大益处。

相似文献

1
[Home vs hospital-based pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a Spanish multicenter trial].[慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者家庭与医院肺康复治疗的比较:一项西班牙多中心试验]
Arch Bronconeumol. 2008 Oct;44(10):512-8.
2
Home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in very severe COPD: is it safe and useful?家庭为基础的慢性阻塞性肺疾病极重度患者肺康复:安全且有效吗?
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2009 Sep-Oct;29(5):325-31. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e3181ac7b9d.
3
A comparison of twice- versus once-weekly supervision during pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺康复期间每周一次与每周两次监督的比较。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Feb;88(2):167-72. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.11.007.
4
Daily functioning of dyspnea, self-esteem and physical self in patients with moderate COPD before, during and after a first inpatient rehabilitation program.中度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者在首次住院康复计划前、期间及之后呼吸困难、自尊和身体自我的日常功能。
Disabil Rehabil. 2007 Nov 30;29(22):1671-8. doi: 10.1080/09638280601055949.
5
[Effectiveness of inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (AHB). Results of a multicenter prospective observation study].[住院患者肺康复(AHB)的有效性。一项多中心前瞻性观察研究的结果]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2006 Aug 18;131(33):1793-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-949155.
6
Duration of pulmonary rehabilitation to achieve a plateau in quality of life and walk test in COPD.COPD 患者实现生活质量和步行试验平台所需的肺康复持续时间。
Respir Med. 2009 May;103(5):722-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.11.013. Epub 2008 Dec 30.
7
Long-term effectiveness of an inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program for elderly COPD patients: comparison between young-elderly and old-elderly groups.老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者住院肺康复计划的长期效果:青年老年人与老年老年人组的比较
Respirology. 2004 Jun;9(2):230-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2004.00561.x.
8
[A randomized controlled trial study of pulmonary rehabilitation with respiratory physiology as the guide on prognosis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].以呼吸生理学为指导的肺康复对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者预后的随机对照试验研究
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2008 Oct;20(10):607-10.
9
Pulmonary rehabilitation after acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients who previously completed a pulmonary rehabilitation program.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重后曾完成肺康复计划患者的肺康复。
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2009 Sep-Oct;29(5):318-24. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e3181ac7bb8.
10
Psychosocial conditions do not affect short-term outcome of multidisciplinary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.社会心理状况不影响慢性阻塞性肺疾病多学科康复的短期疗效。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Sep;86(9):1788-92. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.030.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of a Supervised Home-Based Tele-Rehabilitation with Center-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Protocol for a Randomized Non-Inferiority Multicenter Study in Ningxia.基于监督的家庭远程康复与中心式肺康复的比较:宁夏一项随机非劣效性多中心研究方案。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024 Jul 25;19:1707-1719. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S467945. eCollection 2024.
2
Point: Center-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation Is the Standard.观点:以中心为基础的肺康复是标准。
Respir Care. 2024 May 28;69(6):755-762. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11785.
3
[Pulmonary Rehabilitation: From Theory to Practice].
[肺康复:从理论到实践]
Open Respir Arch. 2021 Oct 29;4(1):100143. doi: 10.1016/j.opresp.2021.100143. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.
4
Effectiveness of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation: systematic review and meta-analysis.基于家庭的肺康复的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Respir Rev. 2022 Sep 20;31(165). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0076-2022. Print 2022 Sep 30.
5
Integrated disease management interventions for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的综合疾病管理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 8;9(9):CD009437. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009437.pub3.
6
Effects of a Home-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in GOLD B Group: A Pilot Study.一项针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病GOLD B组患者的居家肺康复计划的效果:一项试点研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 May 4;9(5):538. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9050538.
7
Effect of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation on health-related quality of life, lung function, exercise tolerance, and dyspnea in chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder patients in a tertiary care center in South India.在印度南部一家三级医疗中心,家庭肺康复对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者健康相关生活质量、肺功能、运动耐力和呼吸困难的影响。
Lung India. 2021 May-Jun;38(3):211-215. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_895_20.
8
Defining Modern Pulmonary Rehabilitation. An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.定义现代肺康复。美国胸科学会官方研讨会报告。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 May;18(5):e12-e29. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202102-146ST.
9
Effectiveness of in Lower Limb Physical Performance in Advanced COPD.[具体干预措施]对晚期慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者下肢身体机能的有效性
J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 2;10(5):1010. doi: 10.3390/jcm10051010.
10
Telerehabilitation Using Fitness Application in Patients with Severe Cystic Fibrosis Awaiting Lung Transplant: A Pilot Study.针对等待肺移植的重度囊性纤维化患者使用健身应用程序进行远程康复:一项试点研究。
Int J Telemed Appl. 2021 Feb 26;2021:6641853. doi: 10.1155/2021/6641853. eCollection 2021.