Suppr超能文献

相同还是不同?对语音意识和快速命名病因的见解。

Same or different? Insights into the etiology of phonological awareness and rapid naming.

作者信息

Naples Adam J, Chang Joseph T, Katz Leonard, Grigorenko Elena L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.

出版信息

Biol Psychol. 2009 Feb;80(2):226-39. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.10.002. Epub 2008 Oct 21.

Abstract

This work's objective was to offer additional insights into the psychological and genetic bases of reading ability and disability, and to evaluate the plausibility of a variety of psychological models of reading involving phonological awareness (PA) and rapid naming (RN), both hypothesized to be principal components in such models. In Study 1, 488 unselected families were assessed with measures of PA and RN to investigate familial aggregation and to obtain estimates of both the number and effect-magnitude of genetic loci involved in these traits' transmission. The results of the analyses from Study 1 indicated the presence of genetic effects in the etiology of individual differences for PA and RN and pointed to both the shared and unique sources of this genetic variance, which appeared to be exerted by multiple (3-6 for PA and 3-5 for RN) genes. These results were used in Study 2 to parameterize a simulation of 3000 families with quantitatively distributed PA and RN, so that the robustness and generalizability of the Study 1 findings could be evaluated. The findings of both studies were interpreted according to established theories of reading and our own understanding of the etiology of complex developmental disorders.

摘要

这项研究的目的是深入了解阅读能力与阅读障碍的心理和遗传基础,并评估各种涉及语音意识(PA)和快速命名(RN)的阅读心理模型的合理性,这两者均被假定为这些模型的主要组成部分。在研究1中,对488个未经筛选的家庭进行了PA和RN测量,以调查家族聚集情况,并估计这些性状传递过程中涉及的基因座数量和效应大小。研究1的分析结果表明,PA和RN个体差异的病因存在遗传效应,并指出了这种遗传变异的共同和独特来源,这些变异似乎由多个(PA为3 - 6个,RN为3 - 5个)基因施加。研究2利用这些结果对3000个PA和RN定量分布的家庭进行模拟参数化,以便评估研究1结果的稳健性和普遍性。两项研究的结果均根据既定的阅读理论以及我们对复杂发育障碍病因的理解进行解释。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Reduced audiovisual temporal sensitivity in Chinese children with dyslexia.中国阅读障碍儿童视听时间敏感性降低。
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 20;14:1126720. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1126720. eCollection 2023.
4
Reading Profiles in Multi-Site Data With Missingness.多站点数据中存在缺失值时的阅读概况
Front Psychol. 2018 May 8;9:644. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00644. eCollection 2018.
5
Neuropsychology of Learning Disabilities: The Past and the Future.学习障碍的神经心理学:过去与未来
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017 Oct;23(9-10):930-940. doi: 10.1017/S1355617717001084.
6
The intergenerational multiple deficit model and the case of dyslexia.代际多重缺陷模型与阅读障碍案例。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jun 2;8:346. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00346. eCollection 2014.
10
What lexical decision and naming tell us about reading.词汇判断和命名能告诉我们关于阅读的哪些信息。
Read Writ. 2012 Jul 1;25(6):1259-1282. doi: 10.1007/s11145-011-9316-9. Epub 2011 May 29.

本文引用的文献

5
What phonological deficit?什么语音缺陷?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Jan;61(1):129-41. doi: 10.1080/17470210701508822.
8
Reading fluency: the whole is more than the parts.阅读流畅性:整体大于部分之和。
Ann Dyslexia. 2006 Jun;56(1):51-82. doi: 10.1007/s11881-006-0003-5.
10
Replicating genotype-phenotype associations.复制基因型-表型关联。
Nature. 2007 Jun 7;447(7145):655-60. doi: 10.1038/447655a.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验