• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学习方式对错误识别的影响。

The effect of study modality on false recognition.

作者信息

Smith Rebekah E, Hunt R Reed, Gallagher M Patrick

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Texas, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2008 Dec;36(8):1439-49. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.8.1439.

DOI:10.3758/MC.36.8.1439
PMID:19015503
Abstract

A number of previous studies have shown that false recognition of critical items in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm is reduced when study items are presented visually rather than auditorily; however, this effect has not been uniformly demonstrated. We investigated three potential boundary conditions of the effect of study modality in false recognition. Experiments 1 and 2 showed no reduction in false recognition following visual study presentation when the yes-no recognition test was not preceded by a recall test. Experiment 3 showed that visual study presentation can reduce false recognition without a preceding recall test, if the recognition test uses remember-know instructions. The order of the recognition test items did not influence the effect of visual study presentation on false recognition in Experiment 1. In general, the data imply that distinctive processing at study can reduce false memory in recognition if the test demands draw attention to the dimension of distinctive processing.

摘要

先前的一些研究表明,在迪ese/罗迪格-麦克德莫特范式中,当学习项目以视觉而非听觉方式呈现时,对关键项目的错误识别会减少;然而,这种效应并未得到一致的证明。我们研究了学习方式对错误识别影响的三个潜在边界条件。实验1和实验2表明,当是/否识别测试之前没有回忆测试时,视觉学习呈现后错误识别没有减少。实验3表明,如果识别测试使用记得/知道指令,视觉学习呈现可以在没有先前回忆测试的情况下减少错误识别。在实验1中,识别测试项目的顺序不影响视觉学习呈现对错误识别的影响。一般来说,数据表明,如果测试要求将注意力吸引到独特加工的维度上,学习时的独特加工可以减少识别中的错误记忆。

相似文献

1
The effect of study modality on false recognition.学习方式对错误识别的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2008 Dec;36(8):1439-49. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.8.1439.
2
Modality effect in false recognition: evidence from Chinese characters.模态效应在错误再认中的作用:来自汉字的证据。
Int J Psychol. 2010 Feb;45(1):4-11. doi: 10.1080/00207590902757641.
3
Drawing individual images benefits recognition accuracy in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.抽取单个图片有益于德西-罗德里格-麦克德莫特范式中的识别准确性。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Aug;75(8):1571-1582. doi: 10.1177/17470218211056498. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
4
Effects of survival processing and retention interval on true and false recognition in the DRM and category repetition paradigms.生存加工和保持间隔对 DRM 和类别重复范式中的真、假识别的影响。
Memory. 2019 Mar;27(3):353-367. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2018.1511808. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
5
Psychophysiology of false memories in a Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm with visual scenes.视觉场景下的德西-罗迪格-麦克德莫特范式中的虚假记忆的心理生理学
PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030416. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
6
How are false memories distinguishable from true memories in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm? A review of the findings.在 Deese-Roediger-McDermott 范式中,如何区分虚假记忆和真实记忆?对研究结果的综述。
Psychol Res. 2013 Nov;77(6):671-86. doi: 10.1007/s00426-012-0472-6. Epub 2012 Dec 25.
7
Study modality and false recall.研究方式与错误回忆。
Exp Psychol. 2011;58(2):117-24. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000076.
8
The modality effect in false recognition: evidence for test-based monitoring.错误识别中的模态效应:基于测试的监测证据。
Mem Cognit. 2005 Dec;33(8):1407-13. doi: 10.3758/bf03193373.
9
Evidence for adult age-invariance in associative false recognition.成人在联想性错误再认中年龄不变的证据。
Memory. 2020 Feb;28(2):172-186. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2019.1705351. Epub 2019 Dec 22.
10
Is it all in the details? Description content and false recognition errors.一切都体现在细节中吗?描述内容与错误识别误差。
Cogn Process. 2020 May;21(2):185-196. doi: 10.1007/s10339-019-00945-8. Epub 2020 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Pupil response patterns distinguish true from false memories.瞳孔反应模式可区分真实记忆和虚假记忆。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 11;13(1):17244. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44362-6.
2
When do pictures reduce false memory?图片在何时会减少错误记忆?
Mem Cognit. 2020 May;48(4):623-644. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00995-5.
3
Different definitions of the nonrecollection-based response option(s) change how people use the "remember" response in the remember/know paradigm.不同的无法回忆反应选项的定义改变了人们在“记得/知道”范式中使用“记得”反应的方式。

本文引用的文献

1
From a passing thought to a false memory in 2 minutes: Confusing real and illusory events.从转瞬即逝的想法到两分钟内的虚假记忆:混淆真实和虚幻的事件。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Mar;3(1):105-11. doi: 10.3758/BF03210749.
2
The modality effect in false recognition: evidence for test-based monitoring.错误识别中的模态效应:基于测试的监测证据。
Mem Cognit. 2005 Dec;33(8):1407-13. doi: 10.3758/bf03193373.
3
Adult age differences in distinctive processing: the modality effect on false recall.成年人在独特加工方面的年龄差异:模态效应与错误回忆
Mem Cognit. 2019 Oct;47(7):1359-1374. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00938-0.
4
The effect of perceptual information on output interference.感知信息对输出干扰的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Feb;26(1):269-278. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1521-y.
5
Why do pictures, but not visual words, reduce older adults' false memories?为什么图片而非视觉化文字能减少老年人的错误记忆?
Psychol Aging. 2015 Sep;30(3):647-55. doi: 10.1037/pag0000044. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
6
How Distinctive Processing Enhances Hits and Reduces False Alarms.独特处理如何提高命中率并减少误报。
J Mem Lang. 2014 Aug 1;75:45-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.04.007.
7
How are false memories distinguishable from true memories in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm? A review of the findings.在 Deese-Roediger-McDermott 范式中,如何区分虚假记忆和真实记忆?对研究结果的综述。
Psychol Res. 2013 Nov;77(6):671-86. doi: 10.1007/s00426-012-0472-6. Epub 2012 Dec 25.
8
How Does Distinctive Processing Reduce False Recall?独特加工如何减少错误回忆?
J Mem Lang. 2011 Nov 1;65(4):378-389. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.06.003.
9
Providing support for distinctive processing: the isolation effect in young and older adults.为独特加工提供支持:年轻和老年人的分离效应。
Psychol Aging. 2011 Sep;26(3):744-51. doi: 10.1037/a0022715.
10
Study modality and false recall.研究方式与错误回忆。
Exp Psychol. 2011;58(2):117-24. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000076.
Psychol Aging. 2005 Sep;20(3):486-92. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.20.3.486.
4
Why distinctive information reduces false memories: evidence for both impoverished relational-encoding and distinctiveness heuristic accounts.为何独特信息能减少错误记忆:关于关系编码不足和独特性启发式解释的证据
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Jul;30(4):787-95. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.787.
5
The effects of associations and aging on illusory recollection.
Mem Cognit. 2003 Oct;31(7):1036-44. doi: 10.3758/bf03196124.
6
On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.关于即时回忆中特定言语侵入现象发生的预测。
J Exp Psychol. 1959 Jul;58(1):17-22. doi: 10.1037/h0046671.
7
Paradoxical effects of presentation modality on false memory.
Memory. 2002 Jan;10(1):55-61. doi: 10.1080/09658210143000236.
8
Factors that determine false recall: a multiple regression analysis.决定错误回忆的因素:多元回归分析
Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Sep;8(3):385-407. doi: 10.3758/bf03196177.
9
Presentation modality and mode of recall in verbal false memory.言语错误记忆中的呈现方式与回忆模式。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Jul;27(4):913-9. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.27.4.913.
10
False recognition occurs more frequently during source identification than during old-new recognition.在来源识别过程中,错误识别比新旧识别过程中更频繁地出现。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Mar;27(2):375-83. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.375.