Suppr超能文献

系统评价方法在营养领域的应用。

Application of systematic review methodology to the field of nutrition.

作者信息

Lichtenstein Alice H, Yetley Elizabeth A, Lau Joseph

机构信息

Cardiovascular Nutrition Laboratory, Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA.

出版信息

J Nutr. 2008 Dec;138(12):2297-306. doi: 10.3945/jn.108.097154.

Abstract

Systematic reviews represent a rigorous and transparent approach to synthesizing scientific evidence that minimizes bias. They evolved within the medical community to support development of clinical and public health practice guidelines, set research agendas, and formulate scientific consensus statements. The use of systematic reviews for nutrition-related topics is more recent. Systematic reviews provide independently conducted comprehensive and objective assessments of available information addressing precise questions. This approach to summarizing available data is a useful tool for identifying the state of science including knowledge gaps and associated research needs, supporting development of science-based recommendations and guidelines, and serving as the foundation for updates as new data emerge. Our objective is to describe the steps for performing systematic reviews and highlight areas unique to the discipline of nutrition that are important to consider in data assessment. The steps involved in generating systematic reviews include identifying staffing and planning for outside expert input, forming a research team, developing an analytic framework, developing and refining research questions, defining eligibility criteria, identifying search terms, screening abstracts according to eligibility criteria, retrieving articles for evaluation, constructing evidence and summary tables, assessing methodological quality and applicability, and synthesizing results including performing meta-analysis, if appropriate. Unique and at times challenging, nutrition-related considerations include baseline nutrient exposure, nutrient status, bioequivalence of bioactive compounds, bioavailability, multiple and interrelated biological functions, undefined nature of some interventions, and uncertainties in intake assessment. Systematic reviews are a valuable and independent component of decision-making processes by groups responsible for developing science-based recommendations and policies.

摘要

系统评价代表了一种严谨且透明的科学证据综合方法,可将偏差降至最低。它们在医学界发展起来,以支持临床和公共卫生实践指南的制定、设定研究议程以及形成科学共识声明。系统评价在营养相关主题上的应用相对较新。系统评价对针对精确问题的现有信息进行独立的全面客观评估。这种总结现有数据的方法是识别科学现状(包括知识空白和相关研究需求)、支持基于科学的建议和指南制定以及作为新数据出现时更新依据的有用工具。我们的目标是描述进行系统评价的步骤,并强调营养学科特有的在数据评估中需要重点考虑的领域。生成系统评价所涉及的步骤包括确定人员配备和规划外部专家投入、组建研究团队、制定分析框架、提出并完善研究问题、定义纳入标准、确定检索词、根据纳入标准筛选摘要、获取文章进行评估、构建证据和汇总表、评估方法学质量和适用性以及综合结果(包括在适当情况下进行荟萃分析)。与营养相关的考量独特且有时具有挑战性,包括基线营养素暴露、营养状况、生物活性化合物的生物等效性、生物利用度、多种相互关联的生物学功能、某些干预措施性质不明确以及摄入量评估的不确定性。系统评价是负责制定基于科学的建议和政策的团体决策过程中有价值且独立的组成部分。

相似文献

1
Application of systematic review methodology to the field of nutrition.
J Nutr. 2008 Dec;138(12):2297-306. doi: 10.3945/jn.108.097154.
2
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Evidence-based toxicology: a comprehensive framework for causation.
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2005 Apr;24(4):161-201. doi: 10.1191/0960327105ht517oa.
5
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
6
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
7
Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. doi: 10.3310/hta8360.
8
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
9
Nutrition support in hospitalised adults at nutritional risk.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 19;5(5):CD011598. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011598.pub2.
10
How effects on health equity are assessed in systematic reviews of interventions.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 18;1(1):MR000028. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000028.pub3.

引用本文的文献

4
Flavan-3-ols and Cardiometabolic Health: First Ever Dietary Bioactive Guideline.
Adv Nutr. 2022 Dec 22;13(6):2070-2083. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmac105.
6
A systematic review on nomophobia prevalence: Surfacing results and standard guidelines for future research.
PLoS One. 2021 May 18;16(5):e0250509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250509. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Imaging studies for low back pain.
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2008;22(4):306-11. doi: 10.1080/15360280802537332.
2
Overview of the conference "Vitamin D and Health in the 21st Century: an Update".
Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Aug;88(2):483S-490S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/88.2.483S.
4
The PICO strategy for the research question construction and evidence search.
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2007 May-Jun;15(3):508-11. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692007000300023.
5
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's evidence-based review for qualified health claims: tomatoes, lycopene, and cancer.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Jul 18;99(14):1074-85. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm037. Epub 2007 Jul 10.
7
Current processes of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: refining evidence-based recommendation development.
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Jul 17;147(2):117-22. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-2-200707170-00170. Epub 2007 Jun 18.
9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验