EPICORE Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Ann Pharmacother. 2009 Jan;43(1):118-22. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L302. Epub 2008 Dec 2.
Although there has been a large number of trials on pharmacist care, often demonstrating clinically significant benefits, the trials generally have not changed practice or healthcare policy. What is needed are focused evidence syntheses, such as a systematic review. A systematic review is defined as a summary that addresses a focused clinical question, using methods to reduce the likelihood of bias. These reviews, which are the highest level of evidence, can help to impact policy by bringing together results of various trials. However, systematic reviews of practice research pose some unique methodologic challenges, including issues with searching, interpreting, and evaluating the available research. Well-conducted systematic reviews of pharmacist interventions could go a long way toward changing pharmacy practice and healthcare policy to recognize the important impact that pharmacists could have in the healthcare system.
尽管已经有大量关于药师护理的试验,这些试验通常显示出具有临床意义的益处,但这些试验通常并没有改变实践或医疗保健政策。需要的是重点证据综合,例如系统评价。系统评价被定义为使用方法减少偏倚可能性来解决重点临床问题的总结。这些综述是最高级别的证据,可以通过汇总各种试验的结果来帮助影响政策。然而,实践研究的系统评价提出了一些独特的方法学挑战,包括搜索、解释和评估现有研究的问题。对药师干预措施进行精心设计的系统评价,可以极大地改变药学实践和医疗保健政策,以认识到药师在医疗保健系统中可能产生的重要影响。