Raouf A H, Hildrey V, Daniel J, Walker R J, Krasner N, Elias E, Rhodes J M
University Department of Medicine, Walton Hospital, Liverpool.
Gut. 1991 Jun;32(6):702-7. doi: 10.1136/gut.32.6.702.
A controlled trial was performed to compare enteral feeding with either an amino acid based feed or a whole protein feed as sole treatment for active Crohn's disease. Twenty four patients were studied (nine with ileal, 11 with ileocolonic, and four with colonic disease). Both feeds proved effective; nine of 13 patients randomised to receive the amino acid based feed were in clinical remission within three weeks as defined by a simple activity index compared with eight of 11 treated with the whole protein feed. Patients in clinical remission were then crossed over onto the other feed. None of the six patients who were changed to the whole protein feed relapsed over the subsequent three week period compared with three of seven patients who were changed to the amino acid based feed. In responders the median serum C reactive protein concentration fell from 21 mg/l (range 9-82) on entry to 6 mg/l (range 3-19) at six weeks. Seven patients relapsed within eight months of starting solid food (mean 3.7 months), while nine were still in remission (follow up period 3-9 months, median six months). Detailed studies of staged reintroduction of food and permitted food additives were carried out over a four year period in a patient with extensive stricturing small bowel Crohn's disease who had been brought into remission by open treatment with enteral feeding. Carrageenan, other permitted emulsifiers, bread, meat, potatoes, oranges, refined sugar, dairy produce, flour, and rice were all reintroduced without any objective ill effect, but green vegetables provoked a clinical and biochemical relapse within one week of introduction. Remission was rapidly achieved by switching back to the enteral feed but reintroduction of the low residue diet that had been previously tolerated produced a brisk relapse. Clinical and biochemical remission was again achieved by a return to the enteral feed but relapse again occurred with reintroduction of the low residue diet. These studies confirm the therapeutic effect of enteral feeding in Crohn's disease. This effect does not seem to be due to avoidance of whole protein, but the very low residue of chemically defined enteral feeds may be important, particularly in patients with intestinal strictures.
进行了一项对照试验,比较以氨基酸为基础的肠内营养制剂和全蛋白肠内营养制剂作为活动性克罗恩病唯一治疗方法的效果。研究了24例患者(9例回肠病变、11例回结肠病变和4例结肠病变)。两种营养制剂均被证明有效;随机接受以氨基酸为基础的营养制剂的13例患者中,9例在三周内达到临床缓解,这是根据一个简单的活动指数定义的,而接受全蛋白营养制剂治疗的11例患者中有8例达到临床缓解。临床缓解的患者随后换用另一种营养制剂。改为全蛋白营养制剂的6例患者在随后三周内均未复发,而改为以氨基酸为基础的营养制剂的7例患者中有3例复发。缓解患者的血清C反应蛋白浓度中位数从入组时的21mg/L(范围9 - 82)降至六周时的6mg/L(范围3 - 19)。7例患者在开始固体食物的八个月内复发(平均3.7个月),而9例仍处于缓解状态(随访期3 - 9个月,中位数6个月)。对一名广泛性狭窄性小肠克罗恩病患者进行了为期四年的详细研究,该患者通过肠内营养开放治疗进入缓解期,研究内容为分阶段重新引入食物和允许使用的食品添加剂。角叉菜胶、其他允许使用的乳化剂、面包、肉类、土豆、橙子、精制糖、乳制品、面粉和大米重新引入后均未产生任何客观不良影响,但绿色蔬菜在引入后一周内引发了临床和生化复发。通过换回肠内营养制剂迅速实现缓解,但重新引入之前耐受的低渣饮食导致迅速复发。再次通过恢复肠内营养制剂实现临床和生化缓解,但重新引入低渣饮食时又复发。这些研究证实了肠内营养在克罗恩病中的治疗作用。这种作用似乎不是由于避免了全蛋白,而是化学定义的肠内营养制剂的极低残渣可能很重要,特别是在肠道狭窄的患者中。