• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在家庭医疗中,建立和维持医疗信息连续性涉及哪些角色?一项系统综述。

What are the roles involved in establishing and maintaining informational continuity of care within family practice? A systematic review.

作者信息

Crooks Valorie A, Agarwal Gina

机构信息

Department of Geography, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2008 Dec 9;9:65. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-9-65.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2296-9-65
PMID:19068124
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2626592/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Central to establishing continuity of care is the development of a relationship between doctor and patient/caregiver. Transfer of information between these parties facilitates the development of continuity in general; and specifically informational continuity of care. We conducted a systematic review of published literature to gain a better understanding of the roles that different parties - specifically doctors, patients, family caregivers, and technology - play in establishing and maintaining informational continuity of care within family practice.

METHODS

Relevant published articles were sought from five databases. Accepted articles were reviewed and appraised in a consistent way. Fifty-six articles were retained following title and abstract reviews. Of these, 28 were accepted for this review.

RESULTS

No articles focused explicitly on the roles involved in establishing or maintaining informational continuity of care within family practice. Most informational continuity of care literature focused on the transfer of information between settings and not at the first point of contact. Numerous roles were, however, were interpreted using the data extracted from reviewed articles. Doctors are responsible for record keeping, knowing patients' histories, recalling accumulated knowledge, and maintaining confidentiality. Patients are responsible for disclosing personal and health details, transferring information to other practitioners (including new family doctors), and establishing trust. Both are responsible for developing a relationship of trust. Technology is an important tool of informational continuity of care through holding important information, providing search functions, and providing a space for recorded information. There is a significant gap in our knowledge about the roles that family caregivers play.

CONCLUSION

The number of roles identified and the interrelationships between them indicates that establishing and maintaining informational continuity of care within family practice is a complex and multifaceted process. This synthesis of roles provided serves as an important resource for continuity of care researchers in general, for the development of continuity of care quality indicators, and for the practice of family medicine.

摘要

背景

建立连续性医疗服务的核心是医生与患者/护理者之间关系的发展。这些各方之间的信息传递总体上促进了连续性的发展;特别是医疗服务的信息连续性。我们对已发表的文献进行了系统综述,以更好地了解不同各方——特别是医生、患者、家庭护理者和技术——在家庭医疗中建立和维持医疗服务信息连续性方面所起的作用。

方法

从五个数据库中查找相关的已发表文章。以一致的方式对被接受的文章进行审查和评估。经过标题和摘要审查后保留了56篇文章。其中,28篇被接受用于本综述。

结果

没有文章明确关注家庭医疗中建立或维持医疗服务信息连续性所涉及的角色。大多数医疗服务信息连续性文献关注的是不同医疗场景之间的信息传递,而非首次接触时的情况。然而,通过从审查文章中提取的数据对众多角色进行了阐释。医生负责记录保存、了解患者病史、回忆积累的知识以及保密。患者负责披露个人和健康细节、将信息传递给其他从业者(包括新的家庭医生)以及建立信任。双方都负责建立信任关系。技术是医疗服务信息连续性的重要工具,通过保存重要信息、提供搜索功能以及为记录信息提供空间。我们对家庭护理者所起的作用的了解存在重大差距。

结论

所确定的角色数量及其相互关系表明,在家庭医疗中建立和维持医疗服务信息连续性是一个复杂且多方面的过程。这种角色综合对于一般的连续性医疗服务研究人员、连续性医疗服务质量指标的制定以及家庭医学实践而言,都是一项重要资源。

相似文献

1
What are the roles involved in establishing and maintaining informational continuity of care within family practice? A systematic review.在家庭医疗中,建立和维持医疗信息连续性涉及哪些角色?一项系统综述。
BMC Fam Pract. 2008 Dec 9;9:65. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-9-65.
2
The nature of informational continuity of care in general practice.全科医疗中连续性照护的信息本质。
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Nov;58(556):e17-24. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X342624.
3
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
4
Nurses as substitutes for doctors in primary care.护士在初级保健中替代医生的角色。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 16;7(7):CD001271. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001271.pub3.
5
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
6
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
7
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
8
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
9
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
10
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Satisfaction with Antiretroviral Therapy Services in Hadiya Zone, Central Ethiopia Using the Donebidean Model: A Time-Motion Study.采用多纳比迪安模型对埃塞俄比亚中部哈迪亚地区抗逆转录病毒治疗服务的患者满意度:一项时间动作研究
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2024 Mar 5;15:93-103. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S452389. eCollection 2024.
2
The impact of eHealth on relationships and trust in primary care: a review of reviews.电子健康对初级保健中关系和信任的影响:综述研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Nov 3;24(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02176-5.
3
In Doctors We Trust! Addressing Trust Issues for an Enhanced Continuity of Care.我们信任医生!解决信任问题以加强医疗服务的连续性。
Korean J Fam Med. 2023 Jan;44(1):64-65. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.22.0166. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
4
Exploring Factors Affecting Health Care Providers' Behaviors for Maintaining Continuity of Care in Kerala, India; A Qualitative Analysis Using the Theoretical Domains Framework.探讨影响印度喀拉拉邦医疗保健提供者维持连续性护理行为的因素;使用理论领域框架的定性分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 8;10:891103. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.891103. eCollection 2022.
5
Continuity of Care Evaluation: The View of Patients and Professionals about Urban Family Physician Program.连续性医疗评估:患者与专业人员对城市家庭医生项目的看法
Int J Prev Med. 2017 Feb 20;8:7. doi: 10.4103/2008-7802.200525. eCollection 2017.
6
Health information exchange for patients with intellectual disabilities: a general practice perspective.智障患者的健康信息交流:全科医疗视角
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Oct;66(651):e720-8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X686593. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
7
Improving coordination through information continuity: a framework for translational research.通过信息连续性改善协调:转化研究框架
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 25;14:590. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0590-5.
8
Unlocking information for coordination of care in Australia: a qualitative study of information continuity in four primary health care models.澳大利亚协调护理信息的解锁:四个初级保健模式中信息连续性的定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Mar 13;14:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-34.
9
Chronically ill Canadians' experiences of being unattached to a family doctor: a qualitative study of marginalized patients in British Columbia.慢性病人对无法联系家庭医生的体验:不列颠哥伦比亚省边缘化患者的定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Jul 16;13:69. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-69.
10
What is known about the patient's experience of medical tourism? A scoping review.患者对医疗旅游体验的了解有哪些? 系统评价综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Sep 8;10:266. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-266.

本文引用的文献

1
Continuity of care and cardiovascular risk factor management: does care by a single clinician add to informational continuity provided by electronic medical records?连续性护理与心血管危险因素管理:由单一临床医生提供的护理是否会增加电子病历所提供的信息连续性?
Am J Manag Care. 2005 Nov;11(11):689-96.
2
Patients' attitudes towards sharing their health information.患者对分享其健康信息的态度。
Int J Med Inform. 2006 Jul;75(7):530-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.08.009. Epub 2005 Sep 28.
3
Interpersonal continuity of care and care outcomes: a critical review.人际连续性护理与护理结果:一项批判性综述。
Ann Fam Med. 2005 Mar-Apr;3(2):159-66. doi: 10.1370/afm.285.
4
Current evidence on the impact of continuity of care.关于连续性护理影响的当前证据。
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2004 Dec;16(6):693-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mop.0000142488.67171.02.
5
The continuity of care record.连续性医疗记录。
Am Fam Physician. 2004 Oct 1;70(7):1220, 1222-3.
6
Interpersonal continuity of care and patient satisfaction: a critical review.人际连续性护理与患者满意度:一项批判性综述。
Ann Fam Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;2(5):445-51. doi: 10.1370/afm.91.
7
Continuity within primary palliative care: an audit of general practice out-of-hours co-operatives.基层姑息治疗的连续性:对全科非工作时间合作机构的一项审计
J Public Health (Oxf). 2004 Sep;26(3):275-6. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdh161.
8
The quality of record keeping in primary care: a comparison of computerised, paper and hybrid systems.基层医疗中记录保存的质量:计算机化系统、纸质系统和混合系统的比较。
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Dec;53(497):929-33; discussion 933.
9
Continuity of care: an essential element of modern general practice?连续性医疗:现代全科医疗的关键要素?
Fam Pract. 2003 Dec;20(6):623-7. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmg601.
10
Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review.连续性护理:多学科综述。
BMJ. 2003 Nov 22;327(7425):1219-21. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1219.