Wilcox Sara, Dowda Marsha, Dunn Andrea, Ory Marcia G, Rheaume Carol, King Abby C
Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, 921 Assembly Street, PHRC, 3rd Floor, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2009 Jan;6(1):A25. Epub 2008 Dec 15.
Targeting of evidence-based programs can be improved by knowing who benefits least and most. We examined pretest predictors of increased physical activity among participants enrolled in Active for Life.
Participants (N = 1,963) from 9 community-based organizations took part in a 6-month telephone-based or a 20-week group-based behavioral physical activity program and completed a pretest survey; 1,335 participants returned posttest surveys. Interactions tested whether increases in physical activity differed over time, according to baseline characteristics.
In the telephone-based program, participants who were younger and less active at pretest and those who had higher pretest social support showed greater intervention effects. In the group-based program, younger participants, those less active at pretest, women, Hispanics/Latinos, heavier participants, and those who reported more health conditions and osteoporosis showed greater intervention effects.
Participant response to the 2 programs varied by age, baseline activity level, and other factors. For 6 of the 8 variables associated with differential outcomes, the least active group improved the most, which suggests that the programs worked especially well for participants most in need. Participants who were older than 75 years (both groups) and those who reported lower physical activity social support (in the telephone-based program) on entry did not respond as well and may require alternative or more intensive intervention strategies.
通过了解谁受益最少和最多,可以改进基于证据的项目的目标定位。我们研究了参加“积极生活”项目的参与者中身体活动增加的预测试预测因素。
来自9个社区组织的参与者(N = 1,963)参加了为期6个月的电话干预项目或为期20周的基于小组的行为身体活动项目,并完成了预测试调查;1,335名参与者返回了后测试调查。交互作用检验了根据基线特征,身体活动的增加是否随时间而不同。
在基于电话的项目中,预测试时年龄较小、活动较少且预测试时社会支持较高的参与者显示出更大的干预效果。在基于小组的项目中,年龄较小的参与者、预测试时活动较少的参与者、女性、西班牙裔/拉丁裔、体重较重的参与者以及报告有更多健康状况和骨质疏松症的参与者显示出更大的干预效果。
参与者对这两个项目的反应因年龄、基线活动水平和其他因素而异。对于与不同结果相关的8个变量中的6个,最不活跃的组改善最大,这表明这些项目对最需要的参与者效果特别好。75岁以上的参与者(两组)以及在进入时报告身体活动社会支持较低的参与者(在基于电话的项目中)反应不佳,可能需要替代或更强化的干预策略。