Dvorak Robert D, Simons Jeffrey S
Department of Psychology, The University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD 57069 USA.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 May;35(5):572-83. doi: 10.1177/0146167208330855. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
The current study examined the effects of good and poor control and changes in blood glucose following self-control depletion on task persistence. Good self-control attenuated the effect of depletion on task persistence. Poor control exerted a main effect; however, there were no significant interactions between poor control and self-control depletion. In addition, the association between depletion and task persistence was partially mediated by decreases in blood glucose. Task persistence in the experimental, but not control, condition was correlated with several risk behaviors. These correlations provide support for the external validity of the laboratory experiment. The differential effects of good and poor control support a two-mode model of self-control. The interaction between the depletion manipulation and good self-control suggests that associations between good self-control and behavior may be due, in part, to good self-control reducing the effects of self-control demands on behavior.
本研究考察了自我控制资源损耗后血糖的良好和不良控制及其变化对任务坚持性的影响。良好的自我控制减弱了损耗对任务坚持性的影响。不良控制产生了主效应;然而,不良控制与自我控制资源损耗之间没有显著的交互作用。此外,损耗与任务坚持性之间的关联部分是由血糖降低介导的。实验条件下(而非对照条件下)的任务坚持性与多种风险行为相关。这些相关性为实验室实验的外部效度提供了支持。良好和不良控制的差异效应支持了自我控制的双模式模型。损耗操纵与良好自我控制之间的交互作用表明,良好自我控制与行为之间的关联可能部分归因于良好自我控制减少了自我控制需求对行为的影响。