Suppr超能文献

减少冲击波碎石术期间肾损伤的治疗方案。

Treatment protocols to reduce renal injury during shock wave lithotripsy.

作者信息

McAteer James A, Evan Andrew P, Williams James C, Lingeman James E

机构信息

Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202 5120, USA.

出版信息

Curr Opin Urol. 2009 Mar;19(2):192-5. doi: 10.1097/mou.0b013e32831e16e3.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Growing concern over the acute and long-term adverse effects associated with shock wave lithotripsy calls for treatment strategies to reduce renal injury and improve the efficiency of stone breakage in shock wave lithotripsy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Experimental studies in the pig model show that lithotripter settings for power and shock wave rate and the sequence of shock wave delivery can be used to reduce trauma to the kidney. Step-wise power ramping as is often used to acclimate the patient to shock waves causes less tissue trauma when the initial dose is followed by a brief (3-4 min) pause in shock wave delivery. Slowing the firing rate of the lithotripter to 60 shock waves/min or slower is also effective in reducing renal injury and has the added benefit of improving stone breakage outcomes. Neither strategy to reduce renal injury -- not power ramping with 'pause-protection' nor delivering shock waves at reduced shock wave rate --- have been tested in clinical trials.

SUMMARY

Technique in lithotripsy is critically important, and it is encouraging that simple, practical steps can be taken to improve the safety and efficacy of shock wave lithotripsy.

摘要

综述目的

人们越来越关注与冲击波碎石术相关的急性和长期不良反应,这就需要采取治疗策略来减少肾损伤,并提高冲击波碎石术中结石破碎的效率。

最新发现

在猪模型上进行的实验研究表明,碎石机的能量设置、冲击波频率以及冲击波发射顺序可用于减轻对肾脏的创伤。逐步增加能量,即通常用于让患者适应冲击波的方法,在初始剂量后紧接着短暂(3 - 4分钟)暂停冲击波发射时,对组织造成的创伤较小。将碎石机的发射频率降低至每分钟60次或更低,同样能有效减少肾损伤,且还有助于改善结石破碎效果。这两种减少肾损伤的策略——采用“暂停保护”的能量递增法和以较低频率发射冲击波——均未在临床试验中得到验证。

总结

碎石技术至关重要,令人鼓舞的是,可以采取简单实用的措施来提高冲击波碎石术的安全性和有效性。

相似文献

1
Treatment protocols to reduce renal injury during shock wave lithotripsy.
Curr Opin Urol. 2009 Mar;19(2):192-5. doi: 10.1097/mou.0b013e32831e16e3.
2
Optimising an escalating shockwave amplitude treatment strategy to protect the kidney from injury during shockwave lithotripsy.
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E1041-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11207.x. Epub 2012 May 22.
3
Effect of initial shock wave voltage on shock wave lithotripsy-induced lesion size during step-wise voltage ramping.
BJU Int. 2009 Jan;103(1):104-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07922.x. Epub 2008 Aug 1.
9
Evaluation of shock wave lithotripsy injury in the pig using a narrow focal zone lithotriptor.
BJU Int. 2012 Nov;110(9):1376-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11160.x. Epub 2012 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Therapeutic potential of seaweeds and their biofabricated nanoparticles in treating urolithiasis: A review.
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 11;11(1):e41132. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41132. eCollection 2025 Jan 15.
2
Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of ureteral calculi - Abridged version.
Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Dec;15(12):383-393. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7652.
3
Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of ureteral calculi - Full-text.
Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Dec;15(12):E676-E690. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7581.
5
Indications and contraindications for shock wave lithotripsy and how to improve outcomes.
Asian J Urol. 2018 Oct;5(4):256-263. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
6
How can and should we optimize extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?
Urolithiasis. 2018 Feb;46(1):3-17. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-1020-z. Epub 2017 Nov 25.
7
Recent advances in lithotripsy technology and treatment strategies: A systematic review update.
Int J Surg. 2016 Dec;36(Pt D):676-680. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.11.097. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
8
CUA Guideline: Management of ureteral calculi.
Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Nov-Dec;9(11-12):E837-51. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.3483. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
9
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy vs. percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower-pole stones.
Arab J Urol. 2012 Sep;10(3):336-41. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
10
Strategies to optimize shock wave lithotripsy outcome: Patient selection and treatment parameters.
World J Nephrol. 2015 May 6;4(2):230-4. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v4.i2.230.

本文引用的文献

2
Effect of initial shock wave voltage on shock wave lithotripsy-induced lesion size during step-wise voltage ramping.
BJU Int. 2009 Jan;103(1):104-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07922.x. Epub 2008 Aug 1.
3
The acute and long-term adverse effects of shock wave lithotripsy.
Semin Nephrol. 2008 Mar;28(2):200-13. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2008.01.003.
4
Improved acoustic coupling for shock wave lithotripsy.
Urol Res. 2008 Feb;36(1):61-6. doi: 10.1007/s00240-007-0128-y. Epub 2008 Jan 3.
5
Comparison of conventional and step-wise shockwave lithotripsy in management of urinary calculi.
J Endourol. 2007 Dec;21(12):1407-10. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0399.
6
The effect of shock wave rate on the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy: a meta-analysis.
J Urol. 2008 Jan;179(1):194-7; discussion 197. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.173. Epub 2007 Nov 14.
7
Independent assessment of a wide-focus, low-pressure electromagnetic lithotripter: absence of renal bioeffects in the pig.
BJU Int. 2008 Feb;101(3):382-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07231.x. Epub 2007 Oct 8.
8
Renal injury during shock wave lithotripsy is significantly reduced by slowing the rate of shock wave delivery.
BJU Int. 2007 Sep;100(3):624-7; discussion 627-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07007.x. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
10
Reducing shock number dramatically decreases lesion size in a juvenile kidney model.
J Endourol. 2006 Sep;20(9):607-11. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.20.607.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验