• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

光谱域和时域光学相干断层扫描技术在健康和患病眼睛视网膜厚度测量中的比较。

Comparison of spectral- and time-domain optical coherence tomography for retinal thickness measurements in healthy and diseased eyes.

作者信息

Han Ian C, Jaffe Glenn J

机构信息

Duke Eye Center, Durham, North Carolina 27701, USA.

出版信息

Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 May;147(5):847-58, 858.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.11.019. Epub 2009 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.11.019
PMID:19200530
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare retinal thickness (RT) measurements obtained by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and time-domain OCT (TD-OCT) in eyes with and without posterior segment disease diagnoses.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational chart review.

METHODS

Scans of 184 healthy and diseased eyes from 106 patients were included in the study. Pair-wise comparisons of RT measurements from SD-OCT machines from 2 different manufacturers and TD-OCT were performed for all scans and with eyes stratified by disease diagnosis.

RESULTS

Foveal thickness measurements obtained from both SD-OCT machines were greater than those measured by TD-OCT, by 51.0 +/- 23.8 microm and 72.5 +/- 30.4 microm, respectively. The foveal thickness difference between the 2 SD-OCT models was 24.3 +/- 19.1 microm. Foveal thickness differences varied by disease diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

RT measurements obtained by SD-OCT are consistently greater than those obtained by TD-OCT. RT measurement differences may vary by disease diagnosis or by SD-OCT model. Consideration of these measurement differences is essential when OCT-determined RT measurement data are used in clinical settings.

摘要

目的

比较在有和没有后段疾病诊断的眼中,通过光谱域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)和时域光学相干断层扫描(TD-OCT)获得的视网膜厚度(RT)测量值。

设计

回顾性观察图表审查。

方法

该研究纳入了来自106例患者的184只健康和患病眼睛的扫描数据。对来自2个不同制造商的SD-OCT机器和TD-OCT的RT测量值进行了成对比较,所有扫描均进行了比较,并按疾病诊断对眼睛进行了分层。

结果

从两台SD-OCT机器获得的黄斑厚度测量值均大于TD-OCT测量值,分别大51.0±23.8微米和72.5±30.4微米。两种SD-OCT模型之间的黄斑厚度差异为24.3±19.1微米。黄斑厚度差异因疾病诊断而异。

结论

SD-OCT获得的RT测量值始终大于TD-OCT获得的测量值。RT测量差异可能因疾病诊断或SD-OCT模型而异。在临床环境中使用OCT确定的RT测量数据时,考虑这些测量差异至关重要。

相似文献

1
Comparison of spectral- and time-domain optical coherence tomography for retinal thickness measurements in healthy and diseased eyes.光谱域和时域光学相干断层扫描技术在健康和患病眼睛视网膜厚度测量中的比较。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 May;147(5):847-58, 858.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.11.019. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
2
Comparison of retinal thickness measurements between three-dimensional and radial scans on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.光谱域光学相干断层扫描中三维扫描与径向扫描之间视网膜厚度测量的比较。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Sep;148(3):431-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.04.008. Epub 2009 Jun 3.
3
Reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements on normal and pathologic eyes by different optical coherence tomography instruments.不同光学相干断层扫描仪测量正常眼和病变眼视网膜厚度的可重复性。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Dec;150(6):815-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.06.025. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
4
A novel technique of adjusting segmentation boundary layers to achieve comparability of retinal thickness and volumes between spectral domain and time domain optical coherence tomography.一种调整分段边界层的新方法,以实现频域和时域光相干断层扫描之间视网膜厚度和体积的可比性。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Aug 13;53(9):5515-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9868.
5
Prospective comparison of cirrus and stratus optical coherence tomography for quantifying retinal thickness.Cirrus和Stratus光学相干断层扫描技术在定量测量视网膜厚度方面的前瞻性比较。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Feb;147(2):267-275.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.08.018. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
6
Comparison of manually corrected retinal thickness measurements from multiple spectral-domain optical coherence tomography instruments.比较多种谱域光学相干断层扫描仪手动校正的视网膜厚度测量值。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar;96(3):380-5. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2010.201111. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
7
[Comparison of Heidelberg retinal tomography and spectral domain optical coherence tomography examinations for detection of glaucoma].[海德堡视网膜断层扫描与光谱域光学相干断层扫描检测青光眼的比较]
Klin Oczna. 2013;115(2):125-9.
8
Comparison of choroidal thicknesses using swept source and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in diseased and normal eyes.使用扫频源光学相干断层扫描和光谱域光学相干断层扫描对患病眼和正常眼的脉络膜厚度进行比较。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Mar;99(3):354-8. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305331. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
9
Comparison of retinal thickness in normal eyes using Stratus and Spectralis optical coherence tomography.应用 Stratus 和 Spectralis 光学相干断层扫描仪比较正常眼的视网膜厚度。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 May;51(5):2644-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4774. Epub 2009 Dec 10.
10
Comparison of retinal thicknesses measured using swept-source and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices.使用扫频源光学相干断层扫描设备和谱域光学相干断层扫描设备测量的视网膜厚度比较。
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2015 Feb;46(2):172-9. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20150213-23.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of macular retinal thickness measurements using spectral-domain and swept-source optical coherence tomography in healthy eyes.在健康眼睛中使用光谱域和扫频源光学相干断层扫描技术测量黄斑视网膜厚度的比较。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 31;12:1529719. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1529719. eCollection 2025.
2
Reproducibility of Portable OCT and Comparison with Conventional OCT.便携式光学相干断层扫描的可重复性及其与传统光学相干断层扫描的比较。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jun 21;14(13):1320. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14131320.
3
Fairness and generalizability of OCT normative databases: a comparative analysis.
光学相干断层扫描(OCT)标准数据库的公平性与可推广性:一项对比分析
Int J Retina Vitreous. 2023 Aug 21;9(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s40942-023-00459-8.
4
RPE65-Associated Retinopathies in the Italian Population: A Longitudinal Natural History Study.意大利人群 RPE65 相关视网膜病变:一项纵向自然病史研究。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2022 Feb 1;63(2):13. doi: 10.1167/iovs.63.2.13.
5
Comparison of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography for intra-retinal layers thickness measurements between healthy and diabetic eyes among Chinese adults.中国成年人中健康眼睛与糖尿病性眼睛视网膜内层厚度测量的光谱域光学相干断层扫描比较。
PLoS One. 2017 May 11;12(5):e0177515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177515. eCollection 2017.
6
Comparison and interchangeability of macular thickness measured with Cirrus OCT and Stratus OCT in myopic eyes.Cirrus OCT与Stratus OCT测量近视眼黄斑厚度的比较及互换性
Int J Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec 18;8(6):1196-201. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.06.21. eCollection 2015.
7
Do different spectral domain OCT hardwares measure the same? Comparison of retinal thickness using third-party software.不同的光谱域光学相干断层扫描(OCT)硬件测量结果相同吗?使用第三方软件比较视网膜厚度。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 Nov;253(11):1915-21. doi: 10.1007/s00417-015-3075-2. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
8
Calculating the predicted retinal thickness from spectral domain and time domain optical coherence tomography - comparison of different methods.通过频域和时域光学相干断层扫描计算预测的视网膜厚度——不同方法的比较
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep;252(9):1491-9. doi: 10.1007/s00417-014-2672-9. Epub 2014 May 27.
9
Comparison of optical coherence tomography assessments in the comparison of age-related macular degeneration treatments trials.年龄相关性黄斑变性治疗试验比较中光学相干断层扫描评估的比较
Ophthalmology. 2014 Oct;121(10):1956-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.04.020. Epub 2014 May 15.
10
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Device Independent Intraretinal Layer Segmentation.光学相干断层扫描(OCT)设备无关的视网膜内层分割
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2014 Feb 11;3(1):1. doi: 10.1167/tvst.3.1.1. eCollection 2014 Feb.