Marending Monika, Stark Wendelin J, Brunner Tobias J, Fischer Jens, Zehnder Matthias
Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, Center for Dental and Oral Medicine, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Dent Traumatol. 2009 Feb;25(1):126-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2008.00735.x.
Suspensions of micro- or nanoparticulate SiO(2)-Na(2)O-CaO-P(2)O(5) bioactive glasses could potentially be used as dressings in traumatized front teeth with open apices as an alternative to Ca(OH)(2). These materials have a disinfecting capacity similar to Ca(OH)(2), but bear the advantage of bioactivity. However, because bioactive glasses initially act as alkaline biocides just as Ca(OH)(2) does, they may also negatively affect mechanical dentin properties over time. This was assessed in the current study using standardized human root dentin bars. Specimens were immersed in 1:20 (wt vol(-1)) suspensions of nanometric bioactive glass 45S5 or calcium hydroxide for 1, 10, or 30 days. Control specimens were immersed in pure saline for 30 days (n = 20 per group). Subsequently, modulus of elasticity (E) and flexural strength (FS) of the specimens were determined. Results were compared between groups using one-way anova and Scheffé's post-hoc test. Ca(OH)(2) caused a significant (P < 0.001) 35% drop in mean flexural strength values compared to the control treatment after 10 days. No further change was observed between 10 days and 30 days. Bioactive glass caused a 20% drop in mean flexural strength as compared to the control after 10 days. However, this difference did not reach statistical significance (P > 0.05). No effects of either material on dentin modulus of elasticity values were observed. It was concluded that the calcium hydroxide suspension affected the dentin more than the bioactive glass counterpart; however, the effect was self-limiting and probably restricted to superficial dentin layers, as suggested by the mere decrease in flexural strength but not in modulus of elasticity values.
微米或纳米级SiO(2)-Na(2)O-CaO-P(2)O(5)生物活性玻璃悬浮液有潜力用作根尖开放的外伤前牙的敷料,作为氢氧化钙的替代物。这些材料具有与氢氧化钙相似的消毒能力,但具有生物活性的优势。然而,由于生物活性玻璃最初像氢氧化钙一样作为碱性杀菌剂起作用,随着时间的推移它们也可能对牙本质的机械性能产生负面影响。本研究使用标准化的人牙根牙本质条对此进行了评估。将标本浸入纳米生物活性玻璃45S5或氢氧化钙的1:20(重量/体积)悬浮液中1、10或30天。对照标本浸入纯盐水中30天(每组n = 20)。随后,测定标本的弹性模量(E)和抗弯强度(FS)。使用单因素方差分析和谢费事后检验比较组间结果。10天后,与对照处理相比,氢氧化钙导致平均抗弯强度值显著下降(P < 0.001)35%。在10天至30天之间未观察到进一步变化。与对照相比,生物活性玻璃在10天后导致平均抗弯强度下降20%。然而,这种差异未达到统计学显著性(P > 0.05)。未观察到两种材料对牙本质弹性模量值有影响。得出的结论是,氢氧化钙悬浮液对牙本质的影响比生物活性玻璃更大;然而,这种影响是自限性的,可能仅限于牙本质表层,这从抗弯强度仅下降而弹性模量值未下降可以看出。