Suppr超能文献

受影响下的冒险行为:青少年情绪的模糊痕迹理论

Risk Taking Under the Influence: A Fuzzy-Trace Theory of Emotion in Adolescence.

作者信息

Rivers Susan E, Reyna Valerie F, Mills Britain

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Yale University and Department of Human Development, Cornell University.

出版信息

Dev Rev. 2008 Mar;28(1):107-144. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2007.11.002.

Abstract

Fuzzy-trace theory explains risky decision making in children, adolescents, and adults, incorporating social and cultural factors as well as differences in impulsivity. Here, we provide an overview of the theory, including support for counterintuitive predictions (e.g., when adolescents "rationally" weigh costs and benefits, risk taking increases, but it decreases when the core gist of a decision is processed). Then, we delineate how emotion shapes adolescent risk taking-from encoding of representations of options, to retrieval of values/principles, to application of those values/principles to representations of options. Our review indicates that: (i) Gist representations often incorporate emotion including valence, arousal, feeling states, and discrete emotions; and (ii) Emotion determines whether gist or verbatim representations are processed. We recommend interventions to reduce unhealthy risk-taking that inculcate stable gist representations, enabling adolescents to identify quickly and automatically danger even when experiencing emotion, which differs sharply from traditional approaches emphasizing deliberation and precise analysis.

摘要

模糊痕迹理论解释了儿童、青少年和成年人的风险决策,纳入了社会和文化因素以及冲动性差异。在此,我们概述该理论,包括对反直觉预测的支持(例如,当青少年“理性地”权衡成本和收益时,冒险行为会增加,但当处理决策的核心要点时,冒险行为会减少)。然后,我们阐述情绪如何塑造青少年的冒险行为——从选项表征的编码,到价值观/原则的检索,再到将这些价值观/原则应用于选项表征。我们的综述表明:(i)要点表征通常包含情绪,包括效价、唤醒、感觉状态和离散情绪;(ii)情绪决定是处理要点表征还是逐字表征。我们建议采取干预措施来减少不健康的冒险行为,这些措施应灌输稳定的要点表征,使青少年即使在情绪激动时也能快速自动地识别危险,这与强调深思熟虑和精确分析的传统方法有很大不同。

相似文献

1
Risk Taking Under the Influence: A Fuzzy-Trace Theory of Emotion in Adolescence.
Dev Rev. 2008 Mar;28(1):107-144. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2007.11.002.
2
Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public Policy.
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Sep;7(1):1-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00026.x. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
3
Adolescents' and Young Adults' Online Risk Taking: The Role of Gist and Verbatim Representations.
Risk Anal. 2015 Aug;35(8):1407-22. doi: 10.1111/risa.12369. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
4
Fuzzy-trace theory: dual processes in memory, reasoning, and cognitive neuroscience.
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2001;28:41-100. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(02)80062-3.
5
Fuzzy trace theory and medical decisions by minors: differences in reasoning between adolescents and adults.
J Med Philos. 2013 Jun;38(3):268-82. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jht018. Epub 2013 Apr 19.
6
Viruses, Vaccines, and COVID-19: Explaining and Improving Risky Decision-making.
J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2021 Dec;10(4):491-509. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.08.004. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
7
Development of Risky Decision Making: Fuzzy-Trace Theory and Neurobiological Perspectives.
Child Dev Perspect. 2015 Jun;9(2):122-127. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12117.
8
Neurobiological and memory models of risky decision making in adolescents versus young adults.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Sep;37(5):1125-42. doi: 10.1037/a0023943.
10
Decision-making and risk in bipolar disorder: A quantitative study using fuzzy trace theory.
Psychol Psychother. 2020 Mar;93(1):105-121. doi: 10.1111/papt.12215. Epub 2019 Jan 24.

引用本文的文献

4
Critical tests of fuzzy trace theory in brain and behavior: uncertainty across time, probability, and development.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Jun;23(3):746-772. doi: 10.3758/s13415-022-01058-0. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
5
Baseline brain and behavioral factors distinguish adolescent substance initiators and non-initiators at follow-up.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 8;13:1025259. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1025259. eCollection 2022.
6
Evidence on the Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and Risk Behavior: A Systematic and Meta-Analytic Review.
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 9;13:810012. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.810012. eCollection 2022.
7
Viruses, Vaccines, and COVID-19: Explaining and Improving Risky Decision-making.
J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2021 Dec;10(4):491-509. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.08.004. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
9
The Dark Triad trait of psychopathy and message framing predict risky decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Int J Psychol. 2021 Aug;56(4):623-631. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12766. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
10
To illuminate and motivate: A fuzzy-trace model of the spread of information online.
Comput Math Organ Theory. 2020 Dec;26:431-464. doi: 10.1007/s10588-019-09297-2. Epub 2019 Aug 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public Policy.
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Sep;7(1):1-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00026.x. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
2
Are Emotions Natural Kinds?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Mar;1(1):28-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00003.x.
3
Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires.
Cogn Emot. 2005 May 1;19(3):313-332. doi: 10.1080/02699930441000238.
4
What Good Are Positive Emotions?
Rev Gen Psychol. 1998 Sep;2(3):300-319. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300.
5
A theory of medical decision making and health: fuzzy trace theory.
Med Decis Making. 2008 Nov-Dec;28(6):850-65. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08327066. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
6
Explaining contradictory relations between risk perception and risk taking.
Psychol Sci. 2008 May;19(5):429-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02104.x.
7
How negative emotion enhances the visual specificity of a memory.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Nov;19(11):1872-87. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.11.1872.
8
Explaining developmental reversals in false memory.
Psychol Sci. 2007 May;18(5):442-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01919.x.
9
The impact and acceptability of Canadian-style cigarette warning labels among U.S. smokers and nonsmokers.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2007 Apr;9(4):473-81. doi: 10.1080/14622200701239639.
10
Emotions and false memories: valence or arousal?
Psychol Sci. 2007 Mar;18(3):208-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01874.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验