Greenman Emily, Xie Yu
Soc Sci Res. 2008 Mar;37(1):109-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.07.003.
The relationship between assimilation and the well-being of immigrant children has been the focus of debate in the recent sociological literature. Much of this work has questioned whether classical theories of immigrant adaptation, which assumed assimilation to be an integral part of the process of upward mobility for immigrants, are still applicable to today's immigrant children. This study reevaluates the applicability of classical assimilation theory with a comprehensive empirical assessment of the relationship between assimilation and the well-being of Hispanic and Asian immigrant adolescents. Using Add Health data, we examine the effect of different aspects of assimilation on educational achievement, psychological well-being, and at-risk behaviors. We find that the effect of assimilation varies greatly depending on the ethnic group and outcome under consideration, but that it is generally related to both greater academic achievement and more at-risk behavior. We conclude that assimilation theory is still relevant, but suggest an interpretation that emphasizes a process of decreasing differences between groups rather than either detrimental or beneficial effects of assimilation.
同化与移民儿童福祉之间的关系一直是近期社会学文献中争论的焦点。这项工作中的许多内容都质疑了经典的移民适应理论,该理论认为同化是移民向上流动过程中不可或缺的一部分,是否仍然适用于当今的移民儿童。本研究通过对西班牙裔和亚裔移民青少年的同化与福祉之间的关系进行全面的实证评估,重新评估了经典同化理论的适用性。利用“青少年健康纵向研究”(Add Health)的数据,我们研究了同化的不同方面对学业成就、心理健康和危险行为的影响。我们发现,同化的影响因所考虑的种族群体和结果而异,但总体上它与更高的学业成就和更多的危险行为都有关系。我们得出结论,同化理论仍然具有相关性,但建议一种强调群体间差异减少过程的解释,而不是强调同化的有害或有益影响。