Atlas Steven J, Grant Richard W, Ferris Timothy G, Chang Yuchiao, Barry Michael J
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Mar 3;150(5):325-35. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-5-200903030-00008.
Valid measurement of physician performance requires accurate identification of patients for whom a physician is responsible. Among all patients seen by a physician, some will be more strongly connected to their physician than others, but the effect of connectedness on measures of physician performance is not known.
To determine whether patient-physician connectedness affects measures of clinical performance.
Population-based cohort study.
Academic network of 4 community health centers and 9 hospital-affiliated primary care practices.
155 590 adults with 1 or more visits to a study practice from 2003 to 2005.
A validated algorithm was used to connect patients to either 1 of 181 physicians or 1 of 13 practices in which they received most of their care. Performance measures included breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening in eligible patients; hemoglobin A(1c) measurement and control in patients with diabetes; and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol measurement and control in patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease.
Overall, 92 315 patients (59.3%) were connected to a specific physician, whereas 53 669 patients (34.5%) were connected only to a specific practice and 9606 patients (6.2%) could not be connected to a physician or practice. The proportion of patients in a practice who could be connected to a physician varied markedly (45.6% to 71.2% of patients per practice; P < 0.001). Physician-connected patients were significantly more likely than practice-connected patients to receive guideline-consistent care (for example, adjusted mammography rates were 78.1% vs. 65.9% [P < 0.001] and adjusted hemoglobin A(1c) rates were 90.3% vs. 74.9% [P < 0.001]). Receipt of preventive care varied more by whether patients were more or less connected to a physician than by race or ethnicity.
Patient-physician connectedness was assessed in 1 primary care network.
Patients seen in primary care practices seem to be variably connected with a specific physician, and less connected patients are less likely to receive guideline-consistent care.
National Cancer Institute.
对医生绩效进行有效评估需要准确识别医生所负责的患者。在医生诊治的所有患者中,有些患者与医生的联系会比其他患者更为紧密,但联系程度对医生绩效评估的影响尚不清楚。
确定患者与医生的联系程度是否会影响临床绩效评估。
基于人群的队列研究。
由4个社区卫生中心和9个医院附属基层医疗诊所组成的学术网络。
2003年至2005年期间到研究诊所就诊1次或以上的155590名成年人。
使用经过验证的算法将患者与181名医生中的1名或其接受大部分医疗服务的13个诊所中的1个进行关联。绩效指标包括符合条件患者的乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查;糖尿病患者的糖化血红蛋白测量与控制;以及糖尿病和冠状动脉疾病患者的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇测量与控制。
总体而言,92315名患者(59.3%)与特定医生有关联,而53669名患者(34.5%)仅与特定诊所有关联,9606名患者(6.2%)无法与医生或诊所建立关联。各诊所中能够与医生建立关联的患者比例差异显著(每个诊所患者的45.6%至71.2%;P<0.001)。与仅与诊所有关联的患者相比,与医生有关联的患者接受符合指南治疗的可能性显著更高(例如,调整后的乳房X线摄影率分别为78.1%和65.9%[P<0.001],调整后的糖化血红蛋白率分别为90.3%和74.9%[P<0.001])。预防性保健的接受情况因患者与医生的联系程度高低而产生的差异,比因种族或民族而产生的差异更大。
仅在1个基层医疗网络中评估了患者与医生的联系程度。
在基层医疗诊所就诊的患者与特定医生的联系程度似乎各不相同,联系程度较低的患者接受符合指南治疗的可能性较小。
美国国立癌症研究所。