Nedopil Norbert
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2009;19(4):224-34. doi: 10.1002/cbm.719.
Forensic psychiatry at first glance seems to differ from one country to another due to different historical developments, different legal systems and different mental health systems. In spite of that, forensic psychiatry has several goals shared across countries, principally: assurance of treatment for severely mentally ill people who become delinquent; giving evidence to courts in cases when the offender's mental responsibility is in question; working effectively at the interface of the law and psychiatry, and, in so doing, working well with other clinical and non-clinical professionals in the field; preventing relapse of offenders with mental disorder. In order to achieve these goals, special knowledge and skills must be developed, especially in assessment and management of violence and sexual deviance and of the risk of these behaviours, incorporating techniques developed in neighbouring disciplines. One of the greatest challenges in the development of forensic psychiatry lies in its relationship with general psychiatry. It is arguable that the specialization of psychiatry into sub-specialties has lead to loss of some skills in general psychiatry and to a 'forensification' of people who would previously have been treated as general psychiatry patients.
In partnership, however, general and forensic psychiatrists could potentially achieve more than either group on its own: they could better prevent people with mental illness from becoming offenders; prevent people with mental illness from becoming victims of crime; intervene in the vicious circle from victim to perpetrator; assess young people at risk for antisocial behaviour and protect them from becoming criminals. Clinical research on these topics is just beginning and this article argues for a close integration of forensic psychiatry into the wider mental health system and for a more intensive exchange of knowledge and skills from forensic psychiatry to general psychiatry and vice versa.
乍一看,由于历史发展、法律体系和精神卫生系统不同,各国的法医精神病学似乎存在差异。尽管如此,法医精神病学仍有一些各国共有的目标,主要包括:确保对犯罪的重症精神病患者进行治疗;在犯罪者的精神责任存疑的案件中向法庭提供证据;在法律与精神病学的交叉领域有效开展工作,并在此过程中与该领域的其他临床和非临床专业人员良好合作;预防患有精神障碍的犯罪者复发。为了实现这些目标,必须培养特殊的知识和技能,尤其是在暴力和性偏差行为及其风险的评估和管理方面,要融入邻近学科所开发的技术。法医精神病学发展中最大的挑战之一在于其与普通精神病学的关系。可以说,精神病学向亚专业的专业化发展导致了普通精神病学某些技能的丧失,以及一些原本会被当作普通精神病学患者治疗的人出现“法医化”现象。
然而,普通精神病医生和法医精神病医生携手合作,可能取得比各自单独工作更多的成果:他们可以更好地预防患有精神疾病的人成为犯罪者;预防患有精神疾病的人成为犯罪受害者;干预从受害者到犯罪者的恶性循环;评估有反社会行为风险的年轻人,并保护他们不成为罪犯。关于这些主题的临床研究刚刚起步,本文主张将法医精神病学紧密融入更广泛的精神卫生系统,并促进法医精神病学与普通精神病学之间更深入的知识和技能交流,反之亦然。