Wood Joel, Birmaher Boris, Axelson David, Ehmann Mary, Kalas Catherine, Monk Kelly, Turkin Scott, Kupfer David J, Brent David, Monk Timothy H, Nimgainkar Vishwajit L
Departments of Psychiatry and Human Genetics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and Graduate School of Public Health, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Psychiatry Res. 2009 Apr 30;166(2-3):201-9. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.03.003. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
Morningness/eveningness (M/E) is a stable, quantifiable measure reflecting preferred circadian phase. Two prior studies suggest that bipolar I disorder (BP1) cases are more likely to have lower M/E scores, i.e., be evening types compared with control groups. These studies did not recruit controls systematically and did not evaluate key clinical variables. We sought to replicate the reported associations in a large, well defined sample, while evaluating potential confounding factors. Adults with bipolar disorder (BP) were compared with community controls drawn randomly from the same residential areas (190 cases and 128 controls). M/E was evaluated using the composite scale of morningness (CSM). After accounting for variables correlated with M/E, BP cases had significantly lower CSM scores than controls (i.e., more evening-type or fewer morning-type). There were no significant differences in M/E scores between BP1 or BP2 disorder cases (n=134 and 56, respectively). CSM scores were stable over approximately 2 years in a subgroup of participants (n=52). Individuals prescribed anxiolytic drugs, antidepressants, antipsychotic drugs, mood stabilizers or stimulant drugs had significantly lower age-corrected CSM scores compared with persons not taking these drugs. BP cases are more likely to be evening types, suggesting circadian phase delay in BP cases. Individuals with elevated depressive mood scores are more likely to be evening types. Our results suggest a replicable relationship between circadian phase and morbid mood states.
晨型/夜型(M/E)是一种反映偏好昼夜节律相位的稳定、可量化指标。此前的两项研究表明,与对照组相比,双相I型障碍(BP1)患者更有可能具有较低的M/E得分,即属于夜型。这些研究没有系统地招募对照组,也没有评估关键临床变量。我们试图在一个大型、定义明确的样本中重复所报道的关联,同时评估潜在的混杂因素。将双相情感障碍(BP)成人患者与从相同居住区域随机抽取的社区对照组进行比较(190例患者和128名对照)。使用晨型综合量表(CSM)评估M/E。在考虑与M/E相关的变量后,BP患者的CSM得分显著低于对照组(即更多夜型或更少晨型)。BP1或BP2障碍患者之间的M/E得分无显著差异(分别为n = 134和56)。在一组参与者(n = 52)中,CSM得分在大约2年的时间里保持稳定。与未服用这些药物的人相比,服用抗焦虑药、抗抑郁药、抗精神病药、心境稳定剂或兴奋剂的个体年龄校正后的CSM得分显著更低。BP患者更有可能是夜型,提示BP患者存在昼夜节律延迟。抑郁情绪得分升高的个体更有可能是夜型。我们的结果表明昼夜节律相位与病态情绪状态之间存在可重复的关系。