Grayson M L, Eliopoulos G M, Wennersten C B, Ruoff K L, Klimm K, Sapico F L, Bayer A S, Moellering R C
Department of Medicine, New England Deaconess Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02215.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Jul;35(7):1408-12. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.7.1408.
We reidentified our laboratories' collections of 57 enterococcal isolates previously classified as Enterococcus avium by the API Rapid Strep identification system (Analytab Products, Plainview, N.Y.) with the identification criteria recommended by Facklam and Collins (R. R. Facklam and M. D. Collins, J. Clin. Microbiol. 27: 731-734, 1989). Thirty isolates were identified as true E. avium, 25 isolates were identified as E. raffinosus, and 2 isolates were identified as E. pseudoavium. E. raffinosus could be differentiated from E. avium on the basis of penicillin susceptibility, as follows: MIC for 50% of E. raffinosus isolates tested (MIC50), 32 micrograms/ml; MIC90, 64 micrograms/ml (range, 4 to 64 micrograms/ml); E. avium MIC50, 1 microgram/ml; MIC90, 2 micrograms/ml (range, 0.5 to 2 micrograms/ml). No strains produced detectable beta-lactamase. Penicillin-binding protein (PBP) analysis of all E. raffinosus isolates demonstrated the unique pattern reported previously (M. D. Collins, R. R. Facklam, J. A. E. Farrow, and R. Williamson, FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 57:283-288, 1989); however, a number of newly identified PBPs were noted. Of 25 isolates, 13 had an additional PBP of 77 kDa (designated PBP 6*), while all isolates possessed a 52-kDa PBP (PBP 7) and a 46-kDa PBP (PBP 8). The presence or absence of PBP 6* did not correlate with penicillin susceptibility; however, PBP 7 demonstrated many features suggestive of low penicillin-binding affinity and may represent a possible mechanism for the relative resistance of this species to penicillin, although this hypothesis remains speculative since attempts to develop a penicillin-hypersusceptible E. raffinosus mutant were unsuccessful. E. raffinosus isolates were significantly more likely to exhibit high-level resistance to kanamycin than E. avium strains were (P < 0.001; chi-square); however, no strains demonstrated high-level resistance to gentamicin. No trend toward increasing penicillin resistance was noted among this collection of E. avium and E. raffinosus isolates collected over the past 35 and 14 years, respectively. Relative resistance to penicillin may be a helpful differentiating feature between E. avium and E. raffinosus when assessment of raffinose metabolism is not possible or is indeterminant.
我们用法克兰姆和柯林斯推荐的鉴定标准(R.R.法克兰姆和M.D.柯林斯,《临床微生物学杂志》27:731 - 734,1989年),重新鉴定了我们实验室收集的57株肠球菌分离株,这些分离株先前被API快速链球菌鉴定系统(Analytab Products公司,纽约州普莱恩维尤)分类为鸟肠球菌。30株分离株被鉴定为真正的鸟肠球菌,25株分离株被鉴定为棉籽糖肠球菌,2株分离株被鉴定为伪鸟肠球菌。棉籽糖肠球菌可根据对青霉素的敏感性与鸟肠球菌区分开来,如下:50%测试的棉籽糖肠球菌分离株的最低抑菌浓度(MIC50)为32微克/毫升;MIC90为64微克/毫升(范围为4至64微克/毫升);鸟肠球菌的MIC50为1微克/毫升;MIC90为2微克/毫升(范围为0.5至2微克/毫升)。没有菌株产生可检测到的β-内酰胺酶。对所有棉籽糖肠球菌分离株的青霉素结合蛋白(PBP)分析显示出先前报道的独特模式(M.D.柯林斯、R.R.法克兰姆、J.A.E.法罗和R.威廉姆森,《FEMS微生物学快报》57:283 - 288,1989年);然而,注意到一些新鉴定的PBPs。在25株分离株中,13株有一个额外的77 kDa的PBP(命名为PBP 6*),而所有分离株都有一个52 kDa的PBP(PBP 7)和一个46 kDa的PBP(PBP 8)。PBP 6*的存在与否与对青霉素的敏感性无关;然而,PBP 7表现出许多提示低青霉素结合亲和力的特征,可能代表该菌种对青霉素相对耐药的一种可能机制,尽管这一假设仍属推测,因为试图培育对青霉素高度敏感的棉籽糖肠球菌突变体未成功。棉籽糖肠球菌分离株比鸟肠球菌菌株更有可能表现出对卡那霉素的高水平耐药(P < 0.001;卡方检验);然而,没有菌株表现出对庆大霉素的高水平耐药。在分别收集的过去35年和14年的这批鸟肠球菌和棉籽糖肠球菌分离株中,未发现对青霉素耐药性增加的趋势。当无法评估棉籽糖代谢或评估结果不确定时,对青霉素的相对耐药性可能是区分鸟肠球菌和棉籽糖肠球菌的一个有用特征。