Gilbert B E, Wyde P R, Wilson S Z, Robins R K
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Jul;35(7):1448-53. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.7.1448.
Ribavirin is active in vitro but not in vivo against a number of viruses capable of causing encephalitis. Ribavirin triacetate (RTA), a lipophilic derivative, has been reported to be more effective than ribavirin in protecting animals from encephalitis. By using an influenza A/WSN virus encephalitis model, we demonstrated that RTA administered by small-particle aerosol was able to decrease the death rate and increase the time of survival. To determine if this beneficial effect was due to increased delivery of drug, the pharmacokinetic properties of ribavirin and RTA when administered as an aerosol or by intraperitoneal injection were examined. Aerosol administration of ribavirin or RTA gave significantly higher concentrations of ribavirin in the lungs and serum of mice than did intraperitoneal injection. There was no difference, however, in ribavirin levels when either ribavirin or RTA was administered by small-particle aerosol. In brain tissue, ribavirin concentrations increased with time and did not appear to decrease as rapidly as in lungs and serum. Mean peak ribavirin concentrations in the brain were higher following aerosol administration of ribavirin than RTA, and both were higher than that following intraperitoneal injection of either drug. Administration of ribavirin or RTA by intraperitoneal injection failed to protect mice from a lethal intracerebral inoculation of influenza A/WSN virus, while aerosolized RTA did protect mice. The pharmacokinetics of ribavirin in brain tissue following aerosol administration of either drug did not explain the advantage of RTA over ribavirin in protecting mice from intracerebral infection with influenza A/WSN virus.
利巴韦林在体外对多种可引起脑炎的病毒具有活性,但在体内则不然。据报道,利巴韦林三醋酸酯(RTA),一种亲脂性衍生物,在保护动物免受脑炎侵害方面比利巴韦林更有效。通过使用甲型流感病毒A/WSN脑炎模型,我们证明了通过小颗粒气雾剂给药的RTA能够降低死亡率并延长存活时间。为了确定这种有益效果是否归因于药物递送的增加,我们研究了利巴韦林和RTA以气雾剂形式或腹腔注射给药时的药代动力学特性。与腹腔注射相比,以气雾剂形式给予利巴韦林或RTA可使小鼠肺部和血清中的利巴韦林浓度显著更高。然而,当通过小颗粒气雾剂给予利巴韦林或RTA时,利巴韦林水平没有差异。在脑组织中,利巴韦林浓度随时间增加,并且似乎不像在肺部和血清中那样迅速下降。气雾剂给药后,利巴韦林在脑中的平均峰值浓度高于RTA,并且两者均高于腹腔注射任何一种药物后的浓度。腹腔注射利巴韦林或RTA未能保护小鼠免受甲型流感病毒A/WSN的致死性脑内接种,而雾化的RTA则可以保护小鼠。两种药物以气雾剂形式给药后,利巴韦林在脑组织中的药代动力学并不能解释RTA在保护小鼠免受甲型流感病毒A/WSN脑内感染方面优于利巴韦林的优势。