Gehring Joelle, Kerlinger Paul, Manville Albert M
Central Michigan University, Department of Biology, Mount Pleasant, Michigan 48859, USA.
Ecol Appl. 2009 Mar;19(2):505-14. doi: 10.1890/07-1708.1.
Estimates suggest that each year millions of birds, predominantly Neotropical migrating songbirds, collide with communication towers. To determine the relative collision risks that different nighttime Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) communication tower obstruction lighting systems pose to night-migrating birds, we compared fatalities at towers with different systems: white strobe lights only; red strobe-like lights only; red, flashing, incandescent lights only; and red, strobe-like lights combined with non-flashing, steady-burning, red lights. Avian fatality data used to compare these tower light systems were collected simultaneously in Michigan on 20 consecutive days during early morning hours during peak songbird migration at 24 towers in May and September 2005 (total = 40 days). Twenty-one towers were 116-146 m above ground level (AGL), and three were > or = 305 m AGL. During the two 20-day sample periods, we found a mean of 3.7 birds under 116-146 m AGL towers equipped with only red or white flashing obstruction lights, whereas towers with non-flashing/steady-burning lights in addition to the flashing lights were responsible for 13.0 fatalities per season. Kruskal-Wallis test, ANOVA, Student's t test, and multiple comparisons procedures determined that towers lit at night with only flashing lights were involved in significantly fewer avian fatalities than towers lit with systems that included the FAA "status quo" lighting system (i.e., a combination of red, flashing lights and red, non-flashing lights). There were no significant differences in fatality rates among towers lit with red strobes, white strobes, and red, incandescent, flashing lights. Results from related studies at the same towers in May and September 2004 and September 2003 provide ancillary support for these findings. Our results suggest that avian fatalities can be reduced, perhaps by 50-71%, at guyed communication towers by removing non-flashing/steady-burning red lights. Our lighting change proposal can be accomplished at minimal cost on existing towers, and such changes on new or existing towers greatly reduce the cost of tower operation. Removing non-flashing lights from towers is one of the most effective and economically feasible means of achieving a significant reduction in avian fatalities at existing communication towers.
据估计,每年有数以百万计的鸟类,主要是新热带地区迁徙的鸣禽,与通信塔相撞。为了确定美国联邦航空管理局(FAA)不同的夜间通信塔障碍照明系统对夜间迁徙鸟类造成的相对碰撞风险,我们比较了配备不同系统的塔上的鸟类死亡情况:仅白色频闪灯;仅红色频闪状灯;仅红色、闪烁的白炽灯;以及红色频闪状灯与非闪烁、稳定燃烧的红灯相结合。用于比较这些塔灯系统的鸟类死亡数据于2005年5月和9月鸣禽迁徙高峰期的清晨,在密歇根州连续20天内,同时在24座塔上收集(共计40天)。21座塔高于地面116 - 146米(AGL),3座塔高于或等于305米AGL。在这两个20天的采样期内,我们发现在高于地面116 - 146米、仅配备红色或白色闪烁障碍灯的塔下,平均有3.7只鸟死亡,而除了闪烁灯还配备非闪烁/稳定燃烧灯的塔每个季节造成13.0只鸟死亡。克鲁斯卡尔 - 沃利斯检验、方差分析、学生t检验和多重比较程序确定,夜间仅用闪烁灯照明的塔涉及的鸟类死亡明显少于使用包括FAA“现状”照明系统(即红色闪烁灯和红色非闪烁灯组合)的系统照明的塔。使用红色频闪灯、白色频闪灯和红色闪烁白炽灯照明的塔之间的死亡率没有显著差异。2004年5月和9月以及2003年9月在同一座塔上进行的相关研究结果为这些发现提供了辅助支持。我们的结果表明,通过移除非闪烁/稳定燃烧的红灯,拉线通信塔上的鸟类死亡可能会减少50% - 71%。我们的照明更改建议可以在现有塔上以最小成本完成,并且在新塔或现有塔上进行此类更改可大大降低塔的运营成本。从塔上移除非闪烁灯是在现有通信塔上大幅减少鸟类死亡的最有效且经济可行的方法之一。