Yale Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, 230 South Frontage Road, PO Box 207900, New Haven, CT 06520-7900, USA.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2009 Aug;39(8):1163-72. doi: 10.1007/s10803-009-0728-1. Epub 2009 Mar 27.
A consistent result in the evaluation of group-delivered intervention to promote social reciprocity in children with PDDs is that outcome data are inconclusive. Lack of robust evidence of efficacy confounds understanding of these interventions and their value to the field. It is conceivable that the construct of impaired social reciprocity in PDD presents unique circumstances that require special consideration when evaluating the evidence base. Social reciprocity and impairment in social functioning are complex constructs, which require a multi-dimensional, multi-method approach to intervention and measurement of gains. The existing paradigm for evaluating the evidence base of intervention may need modification to permit a more intricate analysis of the extant research, and increase the sophistication of future research.
一项针对促进 PDD 儿童社会互惠的团体干预的评估结果始终表明,研究结果尚无定论。缺乏有力的疗效证据使得人们难以理解这些干预措施及其对该领域的价值。可以想象,PDD 中受损的社会互惠结构提出了独特的情况,在评估证据基础时需要特别考虑。社会互惠和社会功能障碍是复杂的结构,需要采用多维、多方法的方法来干预和衡量收益。评估干预证据基础的现有范式可能需要修改,以便更细致地分析现有研究,并提高未来研究的复杂性。