Santarpino Giuseppe, Onorati Francesco, Scalas Cristian, De Gori Marco, Cristodoro Lucia, Zofrea Saverio, Renzulli Attilio
Cardiac Surgery Unit, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Heart Vessels. 2009 Mar;24(2):108-15. doi: 10.1007/s00380-008-1095-0. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
Due to the limited life expectancy and the supposed higher morbidity with complete arterial grafting, extensive arterial graft in the elderly is still questioned. It was the aim of this study to evaluate transit time flow and clinical, biochemical and echocardiographic results of elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with either saphenous vein (SV) or radial artery (RA) employed as the second conduit of choice. The present study evaluates clinical and flowmetric results of a prospective series of elderly patients (>or=70 years old) undergoing RA CABG (75 patients, Group A) or SV CABG (163 patients, Group B) during isolated myocardial revascularization, performed either off-pump (OPCABG) and on-pump during the last 5 years at a single academic institution (between January 2003 and December 2007). Transit time flowmetric (TTF) maximum and mean flow, pulsatility index (P.I.), and graft flow reserve (GFR) were compared. Hospital outcome was analyzed. Clinical data were compared between the two groups and one-year follow-up was completed. The two groups showed comparable preoperative and intraoperative variables. When TTF analysis was considered, patients undergoing RA grafting demonstrated a significantly higher maximum (systolic) and mean flow compared to SV grafting, either in circumflex, diagonal, and right coronary territory. Pulsatility index was significantly lower in the RA group in circumflex, diagonal, and right coronary grafts. Furthermore, when GFR was calculated significantly higher values were found in RA conduits in the circumflex, diagonal, and right coronary grafts. Comparable troponin I leakage was detected between the two groups. Postoperative variables addressing hospital outcome were similar in the two groups. When echocardiographic data were analyzed, no differences were recorded in postoperative recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction and wall motion score index. One-year follow-up showed better freedom from acute cardiovascular events in the RA group (P = 0.04). Our data show that despite comparable clinical, biochemical, and echocardiographic results in elderly patients undergoing RA or SV grafting, better flowmetric results - in terms of GFR, mean flow, and pulsatility index - can be detected in arterial conduits.
由于预期寿命有限以及完全动脉搭桥术可能导致更高的发病率,老年患者广泛应用动脉搭桥术仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估采用大隐静脉(SV)或桡动脉(RA)作为第二选择血管的老年冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)患者的血流通过时间、临床、生化及超声心动图结果。本研究评估了在过去5年中于一家学术机构(2003年1月至2007年12月)进行的单纯心肌血运重建期间,接受RA CABG(75例患者,A组)或SV CABG(163例患者,B组)的前瞻性老年患者(≥70岁)的临床和血流测量结果。比较了血流通过时间测量法(TTF)的最大和平均血流量、搏动指数(P.I.)以及血管桥血流储备(GFR)。分析了住院结局。比较了两组的临床数据并完成了一年的随访。两组术前和术中变量具有可比性。当考虑TTF分析时,在回旋支、对角支和右冠状动脉区域,接受RA搭桥的患者相比于接受SV搭桥的患者,其最大(收缩期)和平均血流量显著更高。RA组在回旋支、对角支和右冠状动脉搭桥中的搏动指数显著更低。此外,计算GFR时,RA血管桥在回旋支、对角支和右冠状动脉搭桥中的值显著更高。两组间肌钙蛋白I泄漏情况相当。两组中涉及住院结局的术后变量相似。分析超声心动图数据时,左心室射血分数和室壁运动评分指数的术后恢复情况无差异。一年随访显示RA组急性心血管事件的发生率更低(P = 0.04)。我们的数据表明,尽管接受RA或SV搭桥的老年患者在临床、生化及超声心动图结果方面具有可比性,但在动脉血管桥中可检测到更好的血流测量结果,包括GFR、平均血流量和搏动指数。