Frizzelle Brian G, Evenson Kelly R, Rodriguez Daniel A, Laraia Barbara A
Carolina Population Center, CB# 8120, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Int J Health Geogr. 2009 May 1;8:24. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-8-24.
Health researchers have increasingly adopted the use of geographic information systems (GIS) for analyzing environments in which people live and how those environments affect health. One aspect of this research that is often overlooked is the quality and detail of the road data and whether or not it is appropriate for the scale of analysis. Many readily available road datasets, both public domain and commercial, contain positional errors or generalizations that may not be compatible with highly accurate geospatial locations. This study examined the accuracy, completeness, and currency of four readily available public and commercial sources for road data (North Carolina Department of Transportation, StreetMap Pro, TIGER/Line 2000, TIGER/Line 2007) relative to a custom road dataset which we developed and used for comparison.
A custom road network dataset was developed to examine associations between health behaviors and the environment among pregnant and postpartum women living in central North Carolina in the United States. Three analytical measures were developed to assess the comparative accuracy and utility of four publicly and commercially available road datasets and the custom dataset in relation to participants' residential locations over three time periods. The exclusion of road segments and positional errors in the four comparison road datasets resulted in between 5.9% and 64.4% of respondents lying farther than 15.24 meters from their nearest road, the distance of the threshold set by the project to facilitate spatial analysis. Agreement, using a Pearson's correlation coefficient, between the customized road dataset and the four comparison road datasets ranged from 0.01 to 0.82.
This study demonstrates the importance of examining available road datasets and assessing their completeness, accuracy, and currency for their particular study area. This paper serves as an example for assessing the feasibility of readily available commercial or public road datasets, and outlines the steps by which an improved custom dataset for a study area can be developed.
健康研究人员越来越多地采用地理信息系统(GIS)来分析人们生活的环境以及这些环境如何影响健康。这项研究中经常被忽视的一个方面是道路数据的质量和细节,以及它是否适合分析的尺度。许多现成的道路数据集,包括公共领域和商业领域的,都包含位置误差或概括信息,可能与高精度的地理空间位置不兼容。本研究考察了四个现成的公共和商业道路数据源(北卡罗来纳州交通部、StreetMap Pro、TIGER/Line 2000、TIGER/Line 2007)相对于我们开发并用于比较的自定义道路数据集的准确性、完整性和时效性。
开发了一个自定义道路网络数据集,以研究居住在美国北卡罗来纳州中部的孕妇和产后妇女的健康行为与环境之间的关联。开发了三种分析方法,以评估四个公开和商业可用道路数据集以及自定义数据集在三个时间段内相对于参与者居住位置的比较准确性和实用性。四个比较道路数据集中道路段的排除和位置误差导致5.9%至64.4%的受访者距离其最近道路超过15.24米,这是该项目为便于空间分析而设定的阈值距离。使用皮尔逊相关系数,自定义道路数据集与四个比较道路数据集之间的一致性范围为0.01至0.82。
本研究证明了检查可用道路数据集并评估其在特定研究区域的完整性、准确性和时效性的重要性。本文作为评估现成商业或公共道路数据集可行性的一个示例,并概述了为研究区域开发改进的自定义数据集的步骤。