Critical Care Department, School of Medicine, University Hospital of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
J Cardiol. 2009 Jun;53(3):317-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2008.12.007. Epub 2009 Jan 29.
Current evidence supports that inflammation is a major driving force underlying the initiation of coronary plaques, their unstable progression, and eventual disruption; patients with a more pronounced vascular inflammatory response have a poorer outcome. Biomarkers are generally considered to be proteins or enzymes - measured in serum, plasma, or blood - that provide independent diagnostic and prognostic value by reflecting an underlying disease state. In the case of coronary artery disease (CAD), inflammatory biomarkers, have been extensively investigated; more evidence exists for C-reactive protein (CRP). Using high sensitivity (hs) assays, epidemiologic data demonstrate an association between hs-CRP and risk for future cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among those at high risk or with documented CAD. Moreover, a series of prospective studies provide consistent data documenting that mild elevation of baseline levels of hs-CRP among apparently healthy individuals is associated with higher long-term risk for cardiovascular events. Yet, the predictive value of hs-CRP is found to be independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Recent studies suggest that, besides CRP, other inflammatory biomarkers such as cytokines [interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, IL-8, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1)], soluble CD40 ligand, serum amyloid A (SAA), selectins (E-selectin, P-selectin), myeloperoxidase (MPO), matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), cellular adhesion molecules [intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), vascular adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1)], placental growth factor (PlGF) and A(2) phospholipases may have a potential role for the prediction of risk for developing CAD and may correlate with severity of CAD. Finally, indications suggest that the increased risk associated with inflammation may be modified with certain preventive therapies and biomarkers may help to identify the individuals who would benefit most from these interventions.
目前的证据支持炎症是引发冠状动脉斑块、其不稳定进展和最终破裂的主要驱动力;炎症反应更明显的患者预后更差。生物标志物通常被认为是在血清、血浆或血液中测量的蛋白质或酶,通过反映潜在的疾病状态提供独立的诊断和预后价值。在冠心病 (CAD) 的情况下,炎症生物标志物已经得到了广泛的研究;C 反应蛋白 (CRP) 的证据更多。使用高灵敏度 (hs) 检测,流行病学数据表明 hs-CRP 与高危人群或有记录的 CAD 患者未来心血管发病率和死亡率的风险之间存在关联。此外,一系列前瞻性研究提供了一致的数据,证明在看似健康的个体中,基线 hs-CRP 轻度升高与心血管事件的长期风险增加相关。然而,hs-CRP 的预测价值被发现独立于传统的心血管危险因素。最近的研究表明,除 CRP 外,其他炎症生物标志物,如细胞因子 [白细胞介素 (IL)-1、IL-6、IL-8、单核细胞趋化蛋白-1 (MCP-1)]、可溶性 CD40 配体、血清淀粉样蛋白 A (SAA)、选择素 (E-选择素、P-选择素)、髓过氧化物酶 (MPO)、基质金属蛋白酶 (MMPs)、细胞间黏附分子 [细胞间黏附分子 1 (ICAM-1)、血管细胞黏附分子 1 (VCAM-1)]、胎盘生长因子 (PlGF) 和 A(2) 磷脂酶可能在预测 CAD 风险方面具有潜在作用,并与 CAD 的严重程度相关。最后,有迹象表明,与炎症相关的风险增加可能会被某些预防治疗所改变,生物标志物可能有助于确定从这些干预中受益最多的个体。