Sinclair Lindsey I, Christmas David M, Hood Sean D, Potokar John P, Robertson Andrea, Isaac Andrew, Srivastava Shrikant, Nutt David J, Davies Simon J C
Psychopharmacology Unit, University of Bristol, Dorothy Hodgkin Building, Bristol BS1 3NY, UK.
Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Jun;194(6):483-90. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.048371.
Early worsening of anxiety, agitation and irritability are thought to be common among people commencing antidepressants, especially for anxiety disorders. This phenomenon, which may be termed jitteriness/anxiety syndrome, is cited as an explanation for early treatment failure and caution in using selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). However, we believe that it is inconsistently defined and that robust evidence to support the phenomenon is lacking.
To review systematically all evidence relating to jitteriness/anxiety syndrome to identify: constituent symptoms; medications implicated; disorders in which it was reported; incidence; time course; management strategies; relationship of this syndrome to therapeutic response; distinction between syndrome and akathisia; relationship between syndrome and suicide; and genetic predispositions.
A systematic search identified articles and these were included in the review if they addressed one of the above aspects of jitteriness/anxiety syndrome.
Of 245 articles identified, 107 articles were included for review. No validated rating scales for jitteriness/anxiety syndrome were identified. There was no robust evidence that the incidence differed between SSRIs and tricyclic antidepressants, or that there was a higher incidence in anxiety disorders. Published incidence rates varied widely from 4 to 65% of people commencing antidepressant treatment. Common treatment strategies for this syndrome included a slower titration of antidepressant and the addition of benzodiazepines. Conclusive evidence for the efficacy of these strategies is lacking. There was conflicting and inconclusive evidence as to whether the emergence of this syndrome had a predictive value on the response to treatment. It appears to be a separate syndrome from akathisia, but evidence for this assertion was limited. The effect of jitteriness/anxiety syndrome on suicide rates has not been evaluated. Three studies examined genetic variations and side-effects from treatment, but none was specifically designed to assess jitteriness/anxiety syndrome.
Jitteriness/anxiety syndrome remains poorly characterised. Despite this, clinicians' perception of this syndrome influences prescribing and it is cited to support postulated mechanisms of drug action. We recommend systematised evaluation of side-effects at earlier time points in antidepressant trials to further elucidate this clinically important syndrome.
焦虑、激动和易怒的早期加重现象被认为在开始服用抗抑郁药的人群中很常见,尤其是对于焦虑症患者。这种现象,可称为神经过敏/焦虑综合征,被认为是早期治疗失败的原因之一,也是使用选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)时需谨慎的原因。然而,我们认为该综合征的定义并不一致,且缺乏有力证据支持这一现象。
系统回顾与神经过敏/焦虑综合征相关的所有证据,以确定:构成症状;涉及的药物;报告该综合征的疾病;发病率;病程;管理策略;该综合征与治疗反应的关系;该综合征与静坐不能的区别;该综合征与自杀的关系;以及遗传易感性。
通过系统检索确定相关文章,若文章涉及神经过敏/焦虑综合征上述某一方面,则纳入本综述。
在检索到的245篇文章中,107篇被纳入综述。未发现用于评估神经过敏/焦虑综合征的有效评定量表。没有有力证据表明SSRI与三环类抗抑郁药之间的发病率存在差异,也没有证据表明焦虑症患者的发病率更高。已发表的发病率差异很大,开始抗抑郁治疗的患者中发病率从4%到65%不等。该综合征的常见治疗策略包括更缓慢地滴定抗抑郁药以及加用苯二氮䓬类药物。缺乏这些策略有效性的确凿证据。关于该综合征的出现是否对治疗反应具有预测价值,证据相互矛盾且无定论。它似乎是一种与静坐不能不同的综合征,但支持这一论断的证据有限。神经过敏/焦虑综合征对自杀率的影响尚未得到评估。三项研究检测了基因变异与治疗副作用,但均未专门设计用于评估神经过敏/焦虑综合征。
神经过敏/焦虑综合征的特征仍不明确。尽管如此,临床医生对该综合征的认知会影响处方开具,且被引用来支持药物作用的假定机制。我们建议在抗抑郁试验的早期时间点对副作用进行系统评估,以进一步阐明这一具有临床重要性的综合征。