Pata Giacomo, Casella Claudio, Di Betta Ernesto, Grazioli Luigi, Salerni Bruno
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, 1st Division of General Surgery, University of Brescia, Viale Europa, 11, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
World J Surg. 2009 Aug;33(8):1611-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0082-7.
In hemodynamically stable patients after blunt pancreatic trauma, the main pancreatic duct (MPD) disruption (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma [AAST] grade III-IV-V lesions) is usually treated surgically or by endoscopic stent placement, whereas injuries without duct involvement (grade I-II) are liable to medical treatment. To date, no evidence has been reported regarding nonoperative management (NoM) of grade III injuries. We aimed to evaluate the safety of extending medical management to include cases of distal MPD involvement (grade III).
Data were collected on patients admitted after blunt pancreatic trauma between January 1999 and December 2007. Patients exhibiting hemodynamic instability or hollow organ perforations were excluded from this study, as they were surgically managed. In all remaining cases NoM was attempted. Antibiotic prophylaxis and early total enteral nutrition were routinely adopted. Grade III patients received octreotide during hospitalization and for 6 months after discharge.
Eleven patients (2 with grade I injury, 3 with grade II injury, and 6 with grade III injury, all diagnosed by contrast-enhanced helical CT) were included. Nonsurgical management was carried out in all of these patients. Among grade III patients, one developed a peripancreatic abscess; another, a pancreatic fistula. Both were successfully treated nonoperatively. The average length of hospital stay was similar in grade I-II and grade III patients. After a median follow-up of 57 months no mortality or pancreatic sequelae had occurred.
Under the aforementioned conditions, an attempt to extend NoM to include patients with AAST-grade III lesions can be justified. However, such a strategy demands continuous patient monitoring, because should the case worsen, surgery might become necessary.
在钝性胰腺创伤后血流动力学稳定的患者中,主胰管(MPD)破裂(美国创伤外科学会[AAST] III - IV - V级损伤)通常采用手术治疗或内镜支架置入术,而无导管受累的损伤(I - II级)则倾向于保守治疗。迄今为止,尚无关于III级损伤非手术治疗(NoM)的证据报道。我们旨在评估将保守治疗扩展至包括远端MPD受累(III级)病例的安全性。
收集1999年1月至2007年12月因钝性胰腺创伤入院患者的数据。本研究排除了血流动力学不稳定或存在中空器官穿孔的患者,因为他们接受了手术治疗。在所有其余病例中尝试进行非手术治疗。常规采用抗生素预防和早期全肠内营养。III级患者在住院期间及出院后6个月接受奥曲肽治疗。
纳入11例患者(2例I级损伤,3例II级损伤,6例III级损伤,均通过增强螺旋CT诊断)。所有这些患者均进行了非手术治疗。在III级患者中,1例发生胰周脓肿;另1例发生胰瘘。两者均通过非手术治疗成功治愈。I - II级和III级患者的平均住院时间相似。中位随访57个月后,未发生死亡或胰腺后遗症。
在上述条件下,将非手术治疗扩展至包括AAST III级损伤患者的尝试是合理的。然而,这种策略需要持续的患者监测,因为如果病情恶化,可能需要进行手术。