VicHealth Centre for Tobacco Control, The Cancer Council Victoria, Australia.
Prev Med. 2009 Aug-Sep;49(2-3):219-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.06.015. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
To replicate findings that risk-minimizing and self-exempting beliefs lower quit intentions, and to extend this by testing their capacity to prospectively predict smoking cessation.
13,324 adult (> or =18 years) cigarette smokers from the USA, Canada, UK, and Australia from one of the first three waves (2002-2004) of the International Tobacco Control 4-Country survey were employed for the predictive analysis where beliefs measured in one wave (1-3) of a cohort were used to predict cessation outcomes in the next wave (2-4).
Both types of belief were negatively associated with both intention to quit in the same wave and making a quit attempt at the next wave. When taken together and controlling for demographic factors, the risk-minimizing beliefs continued to be predictive, but the self-exempting belief was not. Some of the effects of risk-minimizing beliefs on quit attempts seem to be independent of intentions, but not consistently independent of other known predictors. There were no consistent predictive effects on sustained cessation among those who made attempts to quit for either measure.
Countering risk-minimizing beliefs may facilitate increased quitting, but this may not be so important for self-exempting beliefs.
复制风险最小化和自我豁免信念降低戒烟意愿的发现,并通过测试它们预测戒烟的能力来扩展这一发现。
来自美国、加拿大、英国和澳大利亚的 13324 名成年(>=18 岁)吸烟者参加了国际烟草控制四国调查的前三个波次(2002-2004 年)中的一个波次的预测分析,其中在一个队列的一个波次(1-3)中测量的信念被用于预测下一个波次(2-4)的戒烟结果。
两种类型的信念都与同一波次的戒烟意愿和下一波次的戒烟尝试呈负相关。当综合考虑并控制人口统计学因素时,风险最小化信念仍然具有预测性,但自我豁免信念则没有。风险最小化信念对戒烟尝试的一些影响似乎独立于意图,但并不始终独立于其他已知的预测因素。对于两种措施中试图戒烟的人来说,都没有持续戒烟的一致预测效果。
反驳风险最小化信念可能有助于增加戒烟,但这对于自我豁免信念可能并不重要。