• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双相障碍患者风险规避和风险寻求行为的改变。

Altered risk-aversion and risk-seeking behavior in bipolar disorder.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Biol Psychiatry. 2009 Nov 1;66(9):840-6. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.05.011. Epub 2009 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.05.011
PMID:19615669
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with high-risk behaviors, such as gambling and impulsivity. However, little is known about the psychological factors that influence these behaviors or their significance for the development of the disorder. In this study, we investigated the effects of highlighting rewards versus highlighting punishments in the risky decision-making of euthymic individuals with bipolar disorder.

METHODS

Twenty euthymic, medication-free men and women with previously undiagnosed bipolar II or bipolar disorder not otherwise specified and 20 age- and IQ-matched healthy men and women completed a computerized risky decision-making task in which mathematically equivalent dilemmas were presented in terms of opportunities to gain rewards ("positively-framed") or to avoid suffering losses ("negatively-framed"). The dependent measures were the proportion of risk-seeking choices (and deliberation times) when making decisions in positively versus negatively framed dilemmas.

RESULTS

As expected, healthy control participants made more risky-seeking choices in response to the negatively framed dilemmas compared with the positively framed dilemmas. However, this effect was significantly attenuated in BD participants who also took significantly longer to make risk-averse responses to the positively framed dilemmas. The BD participants overestimated the number of bad outcomes arising out of positively framed dilemmas.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that risky choice in BD is associated with reduced sensitivity to emotional contexts that highlight rewards or punishments, possibly reflecting altered valuations of prospective gains and losses associated with behavioral options.

摘要

背景

双相情感障碍(BD)与高风险行为有关,例如赌博和冲动。然而,对于影响这些行为的心理因素及其对疾病发展的意义知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们研究了在心境稳定的双相情感障碍患者的风险决策中突出奖励与突出惩罚的影响。

方法

20 名心境稳定、未服用药物的双相 II 型或未特定的双相情感障碍男性和女性患者以及 20 名年龄和智商匹配的健康男性和女性参与者完成了一项计算机化的风险决策任务,其中以获得奖励的机会(“正面框架”)或避免遭受损失的机会(“负面框架”)呈现数学上等价的困境。因变量是在正面框架和负面框架下做出决策时冒险选择的比例(和思考时间)。

结果

正如预期的那样,与正面框架相比,健康对照组参与者在面对负面框架时做出了更多的冒险选择。然而,这种影响在 BD 参与者中明显减弱,他们在面对正面框架时也需要更长的时间来做出避险反应。BD 参与者高估了正面框架下出现的不良结果的数量。

结论

这些数据表明,BD 中的风险选择与对突出奖励或惩罚的情绪背景的敏感性降低有关,这可能反映了与行为选择相关的未来收益和损失的评估发生了变化。

相似文献

1
Altered risk-aversion and risk-seeking behavior in bipolar disorder.双相障碍患者风险规避和风险寻求行为的改变。
Biol Psychiatry. 2009 Nov 1;66(9):840-6. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.05.011. Epub 2009 Jul 17.
2
Altered risk-aversion and risk-taking behaviour in patients with Alzheimer's disease.阿尔茨海默病患者风险规避和冒险行为的改变。
Psychogeriatrics. 2012 Sep;12(3):151-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-8301.2011.00396.x.
3
Iowa Gambling Task performance in euthymic bipolar I disorder: a meta-analysis and empirical study.双相 I 障碍缓解期的 Iowa 赌博任务表现:荟萃分析和实证研究。
J Affect Disord. 2013 Aug 15;150(1):115-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.11.027. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
4
Decision-making and trait impulsivity in bipolar disorder are associated with reduced prefrontal regulation of striatal reward valuation.双相障碍中的决策和特质冲动与纹状体奖赏估值的前额叶调节减少有关。
Brain. 2014 Aug;137(Pt 8):2346-55. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu152. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
5
Insensitivity to the Magnitude of Potential Gains or Losses When Making Risky Choices: Women With Borderline Personality Disorder Compared With Bipolar Disorder and Controls.
J Pers Disord. 2016 Aug;30(4):530-44. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2015_29_216. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
6
Reduced dopamine transporter functioning induces high-reward risk-preference consistent with bipolar disorder.多巴胺转运体功能降低会诱发与双相情感障碍相符的高奖赏风险偏好。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014 Dec;39(13):3112-22. doi: 10.1038/npp.2014.170. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
7
Effects of context on risk taking and decision times in obsessive-compulsive disorder.背景对强迫症中冒险行为和决策时间的影响。
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Apr;75:82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.12.002. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
8
Monetary losses do not loom large in later life: age differences in the framing effect.金钱损失在晚年并不突出:框架效应中的年龄差异。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009 Jun;64(4):457-60. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbp043. Epub 2009 Jun 4.
9
Decisions during negatively-framed messages yield smaller risk-aversion-related brain activation in substance-dependent individuals.在负面框架信息中的决策,在物质依赖个体中产生与风险规避相关的较小脑激活。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Dec;27(4):1141-52. doi: 10.1037/a0030633. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
10
The neural basis of decision-making and reward processing in adults with euthymic bipolar disorder or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).成人轻躁狂双相障碍或注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)患者决策和奖励处理的神经基础。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037306. Epub 2012 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision-Making, Pro-variance Biases and Mood-Related Traits.决策、亲方差偏差与情绪相关特质
Comput Psychiatr. 2024 Aug 21;8(1):142-158. doi: 10.5334/cpsy.114. eCollection 2024.
2
Mathematical modeling of risk-taking in bipolar disorder: Evidence of reduced behavioral consistency, with altered loss aversion specific to those with history of substance use disorder.双相情感障碍中冒险行为的数学模型:行为一致性降低的证据,伴有物质使用障碍史者的损失厌恶改变。
Comput Psychiatr. 2022;6(1):96-116. doi: 10.5334/cpsy.61. Epub 2022 May 24.
3
Comparing adaptive coding of reward in bipolar I disorder and schizophrenia.
比较双相情感障碍和精神分裂症中奖励的适应性编码。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2023 Feb 1;44(2):523-534. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26078. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
4
No Differences in Value-Based Decision-Making Due to Use of Oral Contraceptives.使用口服避孕药不会导致基于价值的决策出现差异。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 22;13:817825. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.817825. eCollection 2022.
5
Changes in Loss Sensitivity During Treatment in Concurrent Disorders Inpatients: A Computational Model Approach to Assessing Risky Decision-Making.并发疾病住院患者治疗期间损失敏感性的变化:一种评估风险决策的计算模型方法
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 28;12:794014. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.794014. eCollection 2021.
6
No group differences in Traditional Economics Measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar I disorder.双相I型障碍中传统经济学的损失厌恶和框架效应测量方面不存在组间差异。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 9;16(11):e0258360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258360. eCollection 2021.
7
Characterising the shared genetic determinants of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and risk-taking.剖析双相情感障碍、精神分裂症和冒险行为的共同遗传决定因素。
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 8;11(1):466. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01576-4.
8
Social cognition in siblings of patients with bipolar disorders.双相情感障碍患者同胞的社会认知
Ind Psychiatry J. 2021 Jan-Jun;30(1):157-164. doi: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_25_21. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
9
The Role of the Dorsal-Lateral Prefrontal Cortex in Reward Sensitivity During Approach-Avoidance Conflict.背外侧前额叶皮层在趋近-回避冲突中对奖励敏感性的作用。
Cereb Cortex. 2022 Mar 4;32(6):1269-1285. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab292.
10
Loss Aversion and Risk Aversion in Non-Clinical Negative Symptoms and Hypomania.非临床阴性症状和轻躁狂中的损失厌恶与风险厌恶
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 23;11:574131. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.574131. eCollection 2020.