Ogata Shintaro, Takahashi Mayumi, Minakawa Noriaki, Matsuda Akira
Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido University, Kita-12, Nishi-6, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Sep;37(17):5602-9. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp611. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
In our previous communication we reported the enzymatic recognition of unnatural imidazopyridopyrimidine:naphthyridine (Im:Na) base pairs, i.e. ImO(N):NaN(O) and ImN(O):NaO(N), using the Klenow fragment exo(-) [KF (exo(-))]. We describe herein the successful results of (i) improved enzymatic recognition for ImN(O):NaO(N) base pairs and (ii) further primer extension reactions after the Im:Na base pairs by Deep Vent DNA polymerase exo(-) [Deep Vent (exo(-))]. Since KF (exo(-)) did not catalyze primer extension reactions after the Im:Na base pair, we carried out a screening of DNA polymerases to promote the primer extension reaction as well as to improve the selectivity of base pair recognition. As a result, a family B DNA polymerase, especially Deep Vent (exo(-)), seemed most promising for this purpose. In the ImO(N):NaN(O) base pair, incorporation of NaN(O)TP against ImO(N) in the template was preferable to that of the natural dNTPs, while incorporation of dATP as well as dGTP competed with that of ImO(N)TP when NaN(O) was placed in the template. Thus, the selectivity of base pair recognition by Deep Vent (exo(-)) was less than that by KF (exo(-)) in the case of the ImO(N):NaN(O) base pair. On the other hand, incorporation of NaO(N)TP against ImN(O) in the template and that of ImN(O)TP against NaO(N) were both quite selective. Thus, the selectivity of base pair recognition was improved by Deep Vent (exo(-)) in the ImN(O):NaO(N) base pair. Moreover, this enzyme catalyzed further primer extension reactions after the ImN(O):NaO(N) base pair to afford a faithful replicate, which was confirmed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry as well as the kinetics data for extension fidelity next to the ImN(O):NaO(N) base pair. The results presented in this paper revealed that the ImN(O):NaO(N) base pair might be a third base pair beyond the Watson-Crick base pairs.
在我们之前的通讯中,我们报道了使用克列诺片段外切酶(-)[KF(exo(-))]对非天然咪唑并吡啶嘧啶:萘啶(Im:Na)碱基对,即ImO(N):NaN(O)和ImN(O):NaO(N)的酶促识别。我们在此描述了(i)对ImN(O):NaO(N)碱基对的酶促识别改进以及(ii)在Im:Na碱基对之后通过深孔DNA聚合酶外切酶(-)[深孔(exo(-))]进行进一步引物延伸反应的成功结果。由于KF(exo(-))在Im:Na碱基对之后不催化引物延伸反应,我们对DNA聚合酶进行了筛选,以促进引物延伸反应并提高碱基对识别的选择性。结果,B族DNA聚合酶,尤其是深孔(exo(-)),似乎最适合此目的。在ImO(N):NaN(O)碱基对中,模板中针对ImO(N)掺入NaN(O)TP比天然dNTPs更可取,而当NaN(O)置于模板中时,dATP以及dGTP的掺入与ImO(N)TP的掺入竞争。因此,在ImO(N):NaN(O)碱基对的情况下,深孔(exo(-))对碱基对识别的选择性低于KF(exo(-))。另一方面,模板中针对ImN(O)掺入NaO(N)TP以及针对NaO(N)掺入ImN(O)TP都具有很高的选择性。因此,深孔(exo(-))在ImN(O):NaO(N)碱基对中提高了碱基对识别的选择性。此外,该酶在ImN(O):NaO(N)碱基对之后催化进一步的引物延伸反应,以提供忠实的复制,这通过基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱以及紧邻ImN(O):NaO(N)碱基对的延伸保真度动力学数据得到证实。本文给出的结果表明,ImN(O):NaO(N)碱基对可能是超越沃森-克里克碱基对的第三种碱基对。