• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证葡萄牙语版癌症治疗疲劳功能评估量表(FACT-F)在巴西癌症患者中的适用性。

Validation of the Portuguese version of functional assessment of cancer therapy-fatigue (FACT-F) in Brazilian cancer patients.

机构信息

Physical Therapy Department, Brazilian National Cancer Institute-INCA, Rua do Rezende 128, Centro-Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20231-092, Brazil.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2010 Apr;18(4):481-90. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0697-0. Epub 2009 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-009-0697-0
PMID:19629540
Abstract

GOALS OF WORK

The purpose of this study was to validate the Portuguese version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) in order to establish its assessment properties, including validity and reliability in a sample of Brazilian cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred seventy patients with different types of cancer were included for this study; the mean age was 50.5 years. The reliability was assessed by internal consistency and reproducibility. Construct validity was assessed through convergent validity and discriminant validity. Convergent validity was examined by comparing the FACT-F to the SF-36. Discriminant validity of the FACT-F evaluated the ability of the scale to differentiate defined groups, discriminating patients according to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status and different stages of disease.

MAIN RESULTS

FACT-F had high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.78 for physical well-being, 0.68 for social/family well-being, 0.75 for emotional well-being, 0.74 for functional well-being, 0.91 for fatigue, and 0.92 for total FACT-F). The range of test-retest intraclass correlation was from 0.72 to 0.91 (p < 0.0001). The Pearson product correlation revealed good correlations between the total FACT-F and subscales of the SF-36 in most dimensions, ranging from r = 0.51 to r = 0.76, except for SF-36 physical (r = 0.31). The positive correlations between the SF-36 vitality scale and FACT-F total (r = 0.76) and the fatigue subscale (r = 0.77) support the convergent validity.

CONCLUSIONS

The Portuguese version of FACT-F is a reliable and valid instrument to assess quality of life and fatigue, representing a valid tool to screen cancer-related fatigue in Brazilian cancer patients.

摘要

研究目的

本研究旨在验证葡萄牙文版功能性评估癌症治疗疲劳量表(FACT-F)的有效性,以确定其在巴西癌症患者样本中的评估特性,包括有效性和可靠性。

材料与方法

本研究共纳入 270 名患有不同类型癌症的患者,平均年龄为 50.5 岁。通过内部一致性和可重复性评估可靠性。通过收敛有效性和判别有效性评估结构有效性。通过将 FACT-F 与 SF-36 进行比较来检验收敛有效性。通过评估量表区分特定组别的能力,即根据东部合作肿瘤学组表现状态和疾病的不同阶段区分患者,来评估 FACT-F 的判别有效性。

主要结果

FACT-F 具有较高的内部一致性(身体状况的 Cronbach α 系数为 0.78,社会/家庭状况为 0.68,情感状况为 0.75,功能状况为 0.74,疲劳为 0.91,总 FACT-F 为 0.92)。测试-重测的组内相关系数范围为 0.72 至 0.91(p<0.0001)。Pearson 乘积相关显示,在大多数维度上,总 FACT-F 与 SF-36 子量表之间存在良好的相关性,范围从 r=0.51 到 r=0.76,除了 SF-36 身体(r=0.31)。SF-36 活力量表与 FACT-F 总分(r=0.76)和疲劳子量表(r=0.77)之间的正相关支持收敛有效性。

结论

葡萄牙文版 FACT-F 是一种可靠且有效的评估生活质量和疲劳的工具,是巴西癌症患者筛查癌症相关疲劳的有效工具。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Portuguese version of functional assessment of cancer therapy-fatigue (FACT-F) in Brazilian cancer patients.验证葡萄牙语版癌症治疗疲劳功能评估量表(FACT-F)在巴西癌症患者中的适用性。
Support Care Cancer. 2010 Apr;18(4):481-90. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0697-0. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
2
Measurement properties of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Anemia (FACT-An) in patients with anemia associated with chronic kidney disease.用于评估与慢性肾病相关贫血患者的简明健康调查问卷(SF-36)和癌症治疗功能评估-贫血量表(FACT-An)的测量性能。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 May 31;16(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0933-8.
3
Measuring fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) measurement system.使用癌症治疗功能评估(FACT)测量系统来测量疲劳及其他与贫血相关的症状。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1997 Feb;13(2):63-74. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(96)00274-6.
4
Fatigue in Brazilian cancer patients, caregivers, and nursing students: a psychometric validation study of the Piper Fatigue Scale-Revised.巴西癌症患者、护理人员及护理专业学生的疲劳状况:Piper疲劳量表修订版的心理测量学验证研究
Support Care Cancer. 2009 Jun;17(6):645-52. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0518-x. Epub 2008 Nov 6.
5
Assessment of fatigue and dryness in primary Sjögren's syndrome: Brazilian version of "Profile of Fatigue and Discomfort - Sicca Symptoms Inventory (short form) (PROFAD-SSI-SF)".原发性干燥综合征中疲劳和口干的评估:巴西版“疲劳与不适概况 - 干燥症状量表(简表)(PROFAD - SSI - SF)”
Rev Bras Reumatol. 2015 Mar-Apr;55(2):113-22. doi: 10.1016/j.rbr.2014.10.002. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
6
Validation study of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function-Version 3 for the Portuguese population.癌症治疗功能评估-认知功能-第 3 版的葡萄牙语人群验证研究。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Dec 14;10(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-01018-w.
7
THE INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE-FATIGUE PATIENT SELF-ASSESSMENT SCALE: TRANSLATION, CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION AND PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE BRAZILIAN VERSION (IBD-F BRAZIL).炎症性肠病-疲劳患者自我评估量表:巴西版(IBD-F巴西版)的翻译、跨文化调适及心理测量学特性
Arq Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan-Mar;57(1):50-63. doi: 10.1590/S0004-2803.202000000-10.
8
Validity and Reliability of the Indonesian Version of the Brief Fatigue Inventory in Cancer Patients.印尼版简明疲劳量表在癌症患者中的效度和信度
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Nov;52(5):744-751. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
9
Reliability and validity study of a Brazilian-Portuguese version of the fatigue severity scale in Parkinson's disease patients.帕金森病患者巴西葡萄牙语版疲劳严重程度量表的信效度研究
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2012 Jul;70(7):497-500. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2012000700005.
10
Validity and reliability of the Traditional Chinese version of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory in general population.多维疲劳量表中文繁体版在一般人群中的有效性和可靠性。
PLoS One. 2018 May 10;13(5):e0189850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189850. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Measure: Cross-Cultural Validation of an Arabic Version for Older Jordanians.慢性病治疗功能评估-疲劳量表:约旦老年人阿拉伯语版本的跨文化验证
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2025 Jan 15;30(1):47-52. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_332_22. eCollection 2025 Jan-Feb.
2
Effect of Laser Auriculotherapy on Quality of Life, Fatigue, and Anxiety in Women with Advanced Breast Cancer: Randomized Clinical Trial.激光耳穴疗法对晚期乳腺癌女性生活质量、疲劳及焦虑的影响:随机临床试验
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jan 16;13(2):166. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13020166.
3
Comparison of Effects Between Telerehabilitation and In-Person Rehabilitation After Breast Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Fatigue in Brazilian cancer patients, caregivers, and nursing students: a psychometric validation study of the Piper Fatigue Scale-Revised.巴西癌症患者、护理人员及护理专业学生的疲劳状况:Piper疲劳量表修订版的心理测量学验证研究
Support Care Cancer. 2009 Jun;17(6):645-52. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0518-x. Epub 2008 Nov 6.
2
Symptom prevalence and longitudinal follow-up in cancer outpatients receiving chemotherapy.接受化疗的癌症门诊患者的症状患病率及纵向随访
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 May;37(5):823-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.04.015. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
3
A systematic review of the scales used for the measurement of cancer-related fatigue (CRF).
乳腺癌手术后远程康复与面对面康复效果比较:一项随机对照研究。
Integr Cancer Ther. 2024 Jan-Dec;23:15347354241256314. doi: 10.1177/15347354241256314.
4
Health-Related quality of life by 31-item Cervantes scale in breast cancer survivors undergoing adjuvant endocrine therapy.31 项 Cervantes 量表评估乳腺癌辅助内分泌治疗患者的健康相关生活质量。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2024 Feb 6;79:100324. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100324. eCollection 2024.
5
A triple-masked, two-center, randomized parallel clinical trial to assess the superiority of eight weeks of grape seed flour supplementation against placebo for weight loss attenuation during perioperative period in patients with cachexia associated with colorectal cancer: a study protocol.一项三盲、双中心、随机平行临床试验,旨在评估在患有与结直肠癌相关恶病质的患者围手术期,补充八周葡萄籽粉相对于安慰剂在减轻体重方面的优越性:一项研究方案。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 19;14:1146479. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1146479. eCollection 2023.
6
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-fatigue (FACIT-F) among patients with breast cancer.中文版慢性疾病治疗功能评估-疲劳量表(FACIT-F)在乳腺癌患者中的心理测量特性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Aug 15;21(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02164-4.
7
Screening and Assessment of Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Clinical Practice Guideline for Health Care Providers.癌症相关疲劳的筛查与评估:医疗保健提供者临床实践指南
Phys Ther. 2022 Sep 4;102(9). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzac120.
8
Inspiratory muscle training in addition to conventional physical rehabilitation in hospitalized patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a randomized controlled trial.在接受造血干细胞移植的住院患者中,除了常规的物理康复治疗外,进行吸气肌训练:一项随机对照试验。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Nov;30(11):9393-9402. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07373-z. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
9
Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and cancer-related fatigue: associations and effects on depression, anxiety, functional capacity and health-related quality of Life in breast cancer survivors during adjuvant endocrine therapy.血清 25-羟维生素 D 与癌症相关疲劳:在接受辅助内分泌治疗的乳腺癌幸存者中,与抑郁、焦虑、功能能力和健康相关生活质量的关联及其影响。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Aug 6;22(1):860. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09962-x.
10
Validation of the Brazilian Version of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate-FACT-P (Version 4) in Prostate Cancer Patients.验证前列腺癌患者中文版功能性评估癌症治疗-前列腺量表(第四版)(FACT-P)的有效性。
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Dec;37(6):1760-1767. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-02024-z. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
一项关于用于测量癌症相关疲劳(CRF)的量表的系统评价。
Ann Oncol. 2009 Jan;20(1):17-25. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn537. Epub 2008 Aug 4.
4
Is cancer-related fatigue more strongly correlated to haematological or to psychological factors in cancer patients?癌症患者中,与癌症相关的疲劳与血液学因素还是心理因素的相关性更强?
Support Care Cancer. 2008 Aug;16(8):943-6. doi: 10.1007/s00520-007-0357-1. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
5
Functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-fatigue scale is valid in patients with psoriatic arthritis.慢性病治疗-疲劳量表的功能评估在银屑病关节炎患者中是有效的。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Jul;66(7):936-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.065763. Epub 2007 Feb 26.
6
Cross-cultural validation of the Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire in Brazilian primary care.Chalder疲劳问卷在巴西初级保健中的跨文化验证
J Psychosom Res. 2007 Mar;62(3):301-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.10.018.
7
Validation of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale relative to other instrumentation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿性关节炎患者慢性疾病治疗疲劳量表功能评估相对于其他测量工具的效度验证。
J Rheumatol. 2005 May;32(5):811-9.
8
A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires.一种用于健康状况调查问卷翻译及跨文化验证的综合方法。
Eval Health Prof. 2005 Jun;28(2):212-32. doi: 10.1177/0163278705275342.
9
Cross-cultural validation of the Japanese Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An).日本癌症治疗贫血功能评估量表(FACT-An)的跨文化验证
J Nippon Med Sch. 2004 Oct;71(5):314-22. doi: 10.1272/jnms.71.314.
10
Fatigue and psychological distress--exploring the relationship in women treated for breast cancer.疲劳与心理困扰——探索接受乳腺癌治疗的女性中的关系。
Eur J Cancer. 2004 Jul;40(11):1689-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.03.021.