• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大鹅粪便的微生物多样性和宿主特异性序列。

Microbial diversity and host-specific sequences of Canada goose feces.

作者信息

Lu Jingrang, Santo Domingo Jorge W, Hill Stephen, Edge Thomas A

机构信息

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr., MS-387, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA.

出版信息

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Sep;75(18):5919-26. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00462-09. Epub 2009 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1128/AEM.00462-09
PMID:19633110
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2747875/
Abstract

Methods to assess the impact of goose fecal contamination are needed as the result of the increasing number of Canada geese (Branta canadensis) near North American inland waters. However, there is little information on goose fecal microbial communities, and such data are important for the development of host-specific source-tracking methods. To address this issue, 16S rRNA gene clone libraries for Canada goose fecal samples from Ontario, Canada, and Ohio were analyzed. Analyses of fecal clones from Ontario (447) and Ohio (302) showed that goose fecal communities are dominated by the classes "Clostridia" (represented by 33.7% of clones) and "Bacilli" (38.1% of clones) and the phylum "Bacteroidetes" (10.1% of clones). Sequences not previously found in other avian fecal communities were used to develop host-specific assays. Fecal DNA extracts from sewage plants (10 samples) and different species of birds (11 samples) and mammals (18 samples) were used to test for host specificity. Of all the assays tested, one assay showed specificity for Canada goose fecal DNA. The PCR assay was positive for Canada goose fecal DNA extracts collected from three locations in North America (Ohio, Oregon, and Ontario, Canada). Additionally, of 48 DNA extracts from Lake Ontario waters presumed to be impacted by waterfowl feces, 19 tested positive by the assay, although 10 were positive only after a nested PCR approach was used. Due to the level of host specificity and the presence of signals in environmental waters, the assay is proposed as a part of the toolbox to detect Canada goose contamination in waterfowl-contaminated waters.

摘要

由于北美内陆水域附近加拿大鹅(Branta canadensis)数量不断增加,因此需要评估鹅粪便污染影响的方法。然而,关于鹅粪便微生物群落的信息很少,而这些数据对于开发宿主特异性溯源方法很重要。为了解决这个问题,对来自加拿大安大略省和俄亥俄州的加拿大鹅粪便样本的16S rRNA基因克隆文库进行了分析。对来自安大略省(447个)和俄亥俄州(302个)的粪便克隆的分析表明,鹅粪便群落以“梭菌纲”(占克隆的33.7%)、“芽孢杆菌纲”(占克隆的38.1%)和“拟杆菌门”(占克隆的10.1%)为主。利用以前在其他鸟类粪便群落中未发现的序列开发宿主特异性检测方法。使用污水处理厂(10个样本)、不同鸟类(11个样本)和哺乳动物(18个样本)的粪便DNA提取物来测试宿主特异性。在所有测试的检测方法中,有一种检测方法对加拿大鹅粪便DNA具有特异性。该PCR检测方法对从北美三个地点(俄亥俄州、俄勒冈州和加拿大安大略省)采集的加拿大鹅粪便DNA提取物呈阳性。此外,在安大略湖水域假定受水禽粪便影响的48份DNA提取物中,有19份检测呈阳性,不过其中10份仅在使用巢式PCR方法后才呈阳性。由于宿主特异性水平以及环境水体中存在信号,该检测方法被提议作为检测水禽污染水体中加拿大鹅污染的工具箱的一部分。

相似文献

1
Microbial diversity and host-specific sequences of Canada goose feces.加拿大鹅粪便的微生物多样性和宿主特异性序列。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Sep;75(18):5919-26. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00462-09. Epub 2009 Jul 24.
2
Phylogenetic diversity and molecular detection of bacteria in gull feces.鸥粪便中细菌的系统发育多样性及分子检测
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Jul;74(13):3969-76. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00019-08. Epub 2008 May 9.
3
Quantitative real-time PCR assays for sensitive detection of Canada goose-specific fecal pollution in water sources.用于敏感检测水源中加拿大鹅特异性粪便污染的定量实时 PCR 检测方法。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Jul;76(14):4886-9. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00110-10. Epub 2010 May 28.
4
Evaluation of swine-specific PCR assays used for fecal source tracking and analysis of molecular diversity of swine-specific "bacteroidales" populations.用于粪便来源追踪的猪特异性聚合酶链反应检测方法的评估以及猪特异性“拟杆菌目”菌群分子多样性分析。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Sep;75(18):5787-96. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00448-09. Epub 2009 Jul 24.
5
Genetic markers for rapid PCR-based identification of gull, Canada goose, duck, and chicken fecal contamination in water.用于基于 PCR 的快速鉴定水鸟、加拿大鹅、鸭和鸡粪便污染的遗传标记物。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Jan;78(2):503-10. doi: 10.1128/AEM.05734-11. Epub 2011 Nov 11.
6
Comparison of gull feces-specific assays targeting the 16S rRNA genes of Catellicoccus marimammalium and Streptococcus spp.比较针对猫乳球菌和链球菌属 16S rRNA 基因的海鸥粪便特异性检测方法
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Mar;78(6):1909-16. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07192-11. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
7
Bacteroidales diversity in ring-billed gulls (Laurus delawarensis) residing at Lake Michigan beaches.栖息在密歇根湖海滩的环嘴鸥(Laurus delawarensis)中的拟杆菌目多样性。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Mar;75(6):1525-33. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02261-08. Epub 2009 Jan 16.
8
Identification of chicken-specific fecal microbial sequences using a metagenomic approach.使用宏基因组学方法鉴定鸡特异性粪便微生物序列。
Water Res. 2007 Aug;41(16):3561-74. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.033. Epub 2007 May 24.
9
A Meta-analysis of Bacterial Diversity in the Feces of Cattle.牛粪便中细菌多样性的荟萃分析。
Curr Microbiol. 2016 Feb;72(2):145-151. doi: 10.1007/s00284-015-0931-6. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
10
Estimation of pig fecal contamination in a river catchment by real-time PCR using two pig-specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA genetic markers.使用两种猪特异性拟杆菌纲16S rRNA基因标记通过实时PCR法估算河流集水区中的猪粪便污染情况。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 May;75(10):3045-54. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02343-08. Epub 2009 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiomics Characterization of the Canada Goose Fecal Microbiome Reveals Selective Efficacy of Simulated Metagenomes.多组学分析加拿大鹅粪便微生物组揭示了模拟宏基因组的选择性功效。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Dec 21;10(6):e0238422. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02384-22. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
2
The gut microbiome variability of a butterflyfish increases on severely degraded Caribbean reefs.蝴蝶鱼的肠道微生物组变异性在严重退化的加勒比海礁中增加。
Commun Biol. 2022 Jul 30;5(1):770. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03679-0.
3
Comparative Analysis of Fecal Microbiomes From Wild Waterbirds to Poultry, Cattle, Pigs, and Wastewater Treatment Plants for a Microbial Source Tracking Approach.用于微生物源追踪方法的野生水鸟与家禽、牛、猪及污水处理厂粪便微生物群的比较分析
Front Microbiol. 2021 Jul 14;12:697553. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.697553. eCollection 2021.
4
The Use of Ribosomal RNA as a Microbial Source Tracking Target Highlights the Assay Host-Specificity Requirement in Water Quality Assessments.将核糖体RNA用作微生物源追踪目标凸显了水质评估中检测宿主特异性要求。
Front Microbiol. 2021 Jun 2;12:673306. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.673306. eCollection 2021.
5
Comparative Analysis of Gut Microbiota in Captive and Wild Oriental White Storks: Implications for Conservation Biology.圈养与野生东方白鹳肠道微生物群的比较分析:对保护生物学的启示
Front Microbiol. 2021 Mar 25;12:649466. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.649466. eCollection 2021.
6
Contribution of the Broiler Breeders' Fecal Microbiota to the Establishment of the Eggshell Microbiota.肉种鸡粪便微生物群对蛋壳微生物群形成的作用
Front Microbiol. 2020 Apr 15;11:666. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00666. eCollection 2020.
7
Significant Differences in the Gut Bacterial Communities of Hooded Crane () in Different Seasons at a Stopover Site on the Flyway.在某条候鸟迁徙路线中途停歇地,白头鹤不同季节肠道细菌群落存在显著差异。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Apr 17;10(4):701. doi: 10.3390/ani10040701.
8
Associations of Gut Microbiota With Heat Stress-Induced Changes of Growth, Fat Deposition, Intestinal Morphology, and Antioxidant Capacity in Ducks.鸭肠道微生物群与热应激诱导的生长、脂肪沉积、肠道形态及抗氧化能力变化的关联
Front Microbiol. 2019 Apr 26;10:903. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00903. eCollection 2019.
9
Quantification of Microbial Source Tracking and Pathogenic Bacterial Markers in Water and Sediments of Tiaoxi River (Taihu Watershed).苕溪(太湖流域)水体和沉积物中微生物源追踪及致病细菌标志物的定量分析
Front Microbiol. 2019 Apr 24;10:699. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00699. eCollection 2019.
10
Geese Reared in Vineyard: Soil, Grass and Animals Interaction.葡萄园养殖的鹅:土壤、牧草与动物的相互作用
Animals (Basel). 2019 Apr 19;9(4):179. doi: 10.3390/ani9040179.

本文引用的文献

1
Turkey fecal microbial community structure and functional gene diversity revealed by 16S rRNA gene and metagenomic sequences.基于16S rRNA基因和宏基因组序列揭示的火鸡粪便微生物群落结构与功能基因多样性
J Microbiol. 2008 Oct;46(5):469-77. doi: 10.1007/s12275-008-0117-z. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
2
Phylogenetic diversity and molecular detection of bacteria in gull feces.鸥粪便中细菌的系统发育多样性及分子检测
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Jul;74(13):3969-76. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00019-08. Epub 2008 May 9.
3
Experience with the antibiotic resistance analysis and DNA fingerprinting in tracking faecal pollution at two lake beaches.在两个湖滨沙滩进行粪便污染追踪时抗生素耐药性分析和DNA指纹识别的经验。
Water Sci Technol. 2007;56(11):51-8. doi: 10.2166/wst.2007.757.
4
A PCR marker for detection in surface waters of faecal pollution derived from ducks.一种用于检测鸭源粪便污染地表水的聚合酶链式反应(PCR)标记物。
Water Res. 2007 Aug;41(16):3553-60. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.06.043. Epub 2007 Jun 22.
5
Development of a swine-specific fecal pollution marker based on host differences in methanogen mcrA genes.基于产甲烷菌mcrA基因宿主差异开发猪特异性粪便污染标志物。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Aug;73(16):5209-17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00319-07. Epub 2007 Jun 22.
6
Identification of chicken-specific fecal microbial sequences using a metagenomic approach.使用宏基因组学方法鉴定鸡特异性粪便微生物序列。
Water Res. 2007 Aug;41(16):3561-74. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.033. Epub 2007 May 24.
7
Multiple lines of evidence to identify the sources of fecal pollution at a freshwater beach in Hamilton Harbour, Lake Ontario.多条证据用于确定安大略湖汉密尔顿港一处淡水海滩粪便污染的来源。
Water Res. 2007 Aug;41(16):3585-94. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.012. Epub 2007 May 17.
8
Monitoring bacterial communities in raw milk and cheese by culture-dependent and -independent 16S rRNA gene-based analyses.通过基于培养法和非培养法的16S rRNA基因分析监测生乳和奶酪中的细菌群落。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Mar;73(6):1882-91. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01716-06. Epub 2007 Jan 26.
9
Species diversity of campylobacteria in a wild bird community in Sweden.瑞典野生鸟类群落中弯曲杆菌的物种多样性。
J Appl Microbiol. 2007 Feb;102(2):424-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03090.x.
10
Comparison of DNA extraction methods for analysis of turkey cecal microbiota.用于火鸡盲肠微生物群分析的DNA提取方法比较
J Appl Microbiol. 2007 Feb;102(2):401-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03094.x.