Saudino Kimberly J
Psychology Department, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Dev Sci. 2009 Jul;12(4):626-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00801.x.
Activity level (AL) is a highly salient feature of child behaviour that has been linked to developmental outcome. Twin studies of parent-rated, observer-rated and mechanically assessed AL in childhood find that AL is genetically influenced. Few studies, however, consider whether different methods of assessing AL have a shared genetic etiology. Those that do, confound methods and situations. The present study examined whether actigraph and rater-based (parent, observer) measures of AL tap the same genetic influences in a sample of 312 2-year-old twin pairs. Methods were studied within the same situation, thereby controlling for situational influences on AL. The genetic correlation between actigraph and parent-rated AL in the home was .38, indicating modest genetic overlap between the two methods. In contrast, the correlation of genetic effects on actigraph and observer-rated AL in the laboratory was .95, indicating that both laboratory-based measures of AL are influenced by the same genetic effects.
活动水平(AL)是儿童行为的一个非常显著的特征,它与发育结果有关。对儿童期父母评定、观察者评定和机械评估的AL进行的双生子研究发现,AL受遗传影响。然而,很少有研究考虑不同的AL评估方法是否具有共同的遗传病因。那些考虑了的研究,混淆了方法和情境。本研究在312对2岁双生子样本中检验了基于活动记录仪和评定者(父母、观察者)的AL测量方法是否反映相同的遗传影响。在相同情境下研究方法,从而控制情境对AL的影响。家庭中活动记录仪测量的AL与父母评定的AL之间的遗传相关性为0.38,表明这两种方法之间存在适度的遗传重叠。相比之下,实验室中活动记录仪测量的AL与观察者评定的AL的遗传效应相关性为0.95,表明两种基于实验室的AL测量方法受相同遗传效应的影响。