• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Health in the urban environment: a qualitative review of the Brighton and Hove WHO Healthy City Program.城市环境中的健康:对布莱顿和霍夫世界卫生组织健康城市计划的定性评价。
J Urban Health. 2010 Jan;87(1):8-28. doi: 10.1007/s11524-009-9387-y.
2
European Healthy City Network Phase V: patterns emerging for healthy urban planning.欧洲健康城市网络第五阶段:健康城市规划中出现的模式
Health Promot Int. 2015 Jun;30 Suppl 1:i54-i70. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dav033.
3
Evaluation of partnership working in cities in phase IV of the WHO Healthy Cities Network.评价世健联第四阶段城市伙伴关系工作。
J Urban Health. 2013 Oct;90 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):37-51. doi: 10.1007/s11524-011-9647-5.
4
Is a healthy city also an age-friendly city?健康城市是否也是适宜老年人生活的城市?
Health Promot Int. 2015 Jun;30 Suppl 1:i108-i117. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dav039.
5
Partnership structures in the WHO European Healthy Cities project.世界卫生组织欧洲健康城市项目中的伙伴关系结构。
Health Promot Int. 2009 Nov;24 Suppl 1:i37-i44. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dap053.
6
Promoting active living in healthy cities of Europe.促进欧洲健康城市的积极生活。
J Urban Health. 2013 Oct;90 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):142-53. doi: 10.1007/s11524-011-9645-7.
7
Intersectoral planning for city health development.跨部门规划城市卫生发展。
J Urban Health. 2012 Apr;89(2):247-57. doi: 10.1007/s11524-011-9642-x.
8
Evaluating WHO Healthy Cities in Europe: issues and perspectives.评估世界卫生组织在欧洲的健康城市:问题与展望。
J Urban Health. 2013 Oct;90 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):14-22. doi: 10.1007/s11524-012-9767-6.
9
Healthy urban planning in European cities.欧洲城市的健康城市规划。
Health Promot Int. 2009 Nov;24 Suppl 1:i91-i99. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dap059.
10
Evidence-Informed Planning for Healthy Liveable Cities: How Can Policy Frameworks Be Used to Strengthen Research Translation?循证规划健康宜居城市:政策框架如何加强研究转化?
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2019 Sep;6(3):127-136. doi: 10.1007/s40572-019-00236-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Engaging Diverse Community Groups to Promote Population Health through Healthy City Approach: Analysis of Successful Cases in Western Pacific Region.通过健康城市方法吸引多元化社区群体促进人口健康:对西太平洋地区成功案例的分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 19;18(12):6617. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126617.
2
Using Internet Search Queries to Assess Public Awareness of the Healthy Cities Approach: A Case Study in Shenzhen, China.利用互联网搜索查询评估公众对健康城市方法的认识:以中国深圳为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 17;18(8):4264. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084264.

本文引用的文献

1
What makes for sustainable Healthy Cities initiatives?--A review of the evidence from Noarlunga, Australia after 18 years.什么因素促成了可持续的健康城市倡议?——对澳大利亚诺伦加18年后的证据进行的综述
Health Promot Int. 2006 Dec;21(4):259-65. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dal023. Epub 2006 Jul 18.
2
Choosing indicators to evaluate Healthy Cities projects: a political task?选择评估健康城市项目的指标:一项政治任务?
Health Promot Int. 2006 Jun;21(2):145-52. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dal006. Epub 2006 Apr 7.
3
Utility-driven evidence for healthy cities: problems with evidence generation and application.健康城市的效用驱动型证据:证据生成与应用中的问题
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Sep;61(6):1331-41. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.01.028. Epub 2005 Mar 27.
4
Global urbanization and impact on health.全球城市化及其对健康的影响。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2003 Aug;206(4-5):269-78. doi: 10.1078/1438-4639-00223.

城市环境中的健康:对布莱顿和霍夫世界卫生组织健康城市计划的定性评价。

Health in the urban environment: a qualitative review of the Brighton and Hove WHO Healthy City Program.

机构信息

International Health Development Research Centre, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK.

出版信息

J Urban Health. 2010 Jan;87(1):8-28. doi: 10.1007/s11524-009-9387-y.

DOI:10.1007/s11524-009-9387-y
PMID:19669891
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2821608/
Abstract

Phase IV of the WHO European Region's Healthy Cities Program ended in December 2008. This article presents the findings from a recently completed review of Brighton and Hove's Healthy City Program which aimed to scope whether added value had accrued from the city's role as a WHO Healthy City during phase IV. In contrast to most other evaluations of healthy cities, this review adopted a qualitative approach representing an appraisal of the Brighton and Hove Healthy City Program from the internal viewpoint of its local stakeholders. In addition to documentary analysis and a facilitated workshop, a series of in-depth interviews (N = 27) were conducted with stakeholders from the Brighton and Hove Healthy City Partnership representing each of the sectors reflected in the Local Strategic Partnership (public, statutory, elected, community and voluntary, neighborhood and communities, business). The key findings of the review are presented in a way which reflects the three key areas of the review including (1) the healthy cities approach, (2) participation in phase IV of the WHO Healthy Cities Program, and (3) the Brighton and Hove Healthy City Partnership. These findings are discussed, and recommendations for action at local, national, and European levels are proposed. In particular, we argue that there is an urgent need to develop a suitable monitoring and evaluation system for the WHO Healthy Cities Program with appropriate indicators that are meaningful and relevant to local stakeholders. Moreover, it would be important for any such system to capitalize on the benefits that qualitative methodologies can offer alongside more traditional quantitative indicators.

摘要

世界卫生组织欧洲区域的健康城市计划第四阶段已于 2008 年 12 月结束。本文呈现了最近完成的对布赖顿和霍夫健康城市计划的审查结果,该计划旨在评估作为世卫组织健康城市在第四阶段期间是否带来了附加价值。与大多数其他健康城市的评估不同,本次审查采用了定性方法,从当地利益相关者的内部视角评估了布赖顿和霍夫健康城市计划。除了文件分析和促进研讨会外,还对来自布赖顿和霍夫健康城市伙伴关系的利益相关者进行了一系列深入访谈(N=27),这些利益相关者代表了地方战略伙伴关系(公共、法定、民选、社区和志愿、邻里和社区、企业)中反映的每个部门。审查的主要结果以反映审查的三个关键领域的方式呈现,包括(1)健康城市方法,(2)参与世卫组织健康城市计划第四阶段,以及(3)布赖顿和霍夫健康城市伙伴关系。对这些发现进行了讨论,并提出了在地方、国家和欧洲各级采取行动的建议。特别是,我们认为迫切需要为世卫组织健康城市计划开发一个合适的监测和评估系统,该系统需要具有适当的指标,这些指标对当地利益相关者有意义且相关。此外,重要的是,任何此类系统都应充分利用定性方法可以提供的优势,以及更传统的定量指标。