International Health Development Research Centre, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK.
J Urban Health. 2010 Jan;87(1):8-28. doi: 10.1007/s11524-009-9387-y.
Phase IV of the WHO European Region's Healthy Cities Program ended in December 2008. This article presents the findings from a recently completed review of Brighton and Hove's Healthy City Program which aimed to scope whether added value had accrued from the city's role as a WHO Healthy City during phase IV. In contrast to most other evaluations of healthy cities, this review adopted a qualitative approach representing an appraisal of the Brighton and Hove Healthy City Program from the internal viewpoint of its local stakeholders. In addition to documentary analysis and a facilitated workshop, a series of in-depth interviews (N = 27) were conducted with stakeholders from the Brighton and Hove Healthy City Partnership representing each of the sectors reflected in the Local Strategic Partnership (public, statutory, elected, community and voluntary, neighborhood and communities, business). The key findings of the review are presented in a way which reflects the three key areas of the review including (1) the healthy cities approach, (2) participation in phase IV of the WHO Healthy Cities Program, and (3) the Brighton and Hove Healthy City Partnership. These findings are discussed, and recommendations for action at local, national, and European levels are proposed. In particular, we argue that there is an urgent need to develop a suitable monitoring and evaluation system for the WHO Healthy Cities Program with appropriate indicators that are meaningful and relevant to local stakeholders. Moreover, it would be important for any such system to capitalize on the benefits that qualitative methodologies can offer alongside more traditional quantitative indicators.
世界卫生组织欧洲区域的健康城市计划第四阶段已于 2008 年 12 月结束。本文呈现了最近完成的对布赖顿和霍夫健康城市计划的审查结果,该计划旨在评估作为世卫组织健康城市在第四阶段期间是否带来了附加价值。与大多数其他健康城市的评估不同,本次审查采用了定性方法,从当地利益相关者的内部视角评估了布赖顿和霍夫健康城市计划。除了文件分析和促进研讨会外,还对来自布赖顿和霍夫健康城市伙伴关系的利益相关者进行了一系列深入访谈(N=27),这些利益相关者代表了地方战略伙伴关系(公共、法定、民选、社区和志愿、邻里和社区、企业)中反映的每个部门。审查的主要结果以反映审查的三个关键领域的方式呈现,包括(1)健康城市方法,(2)参与世卫组织健康城市计划第四阶段,以及(3)布赖顿和霍夫健康城市伙伴关系。对这些发现进行了讨论,并提出了在地方、国家和欧洲各级采取行动的建议。特别是,我们认为迫切需要为世卫组织健康城市计划开发一个合适的监测和评估系统,该系统需要具有适当的指标,这些指标对当地利益相关者有意义且相关。此外,重要的是,任何此类系统都应充分利用定性方法可以提供的优势,以及更传统的定量指标。