King Monique, Duffield Rob
Exercise and Sports Science Laboratories, School of Human Movement Studies, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, New South Wales, Australia.
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Sep;23(6):1795-802. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b3f81f.
The purpose of this study was to compare four recovery interventions following simulated team sport, intermittent-sprint exercise on consecutive days. Ten female netball players performed four randomized sessions of a simulated netball exercise circuit on consecutive days. Each condition consisted of two identical sessions (Session 1 and 2), with the recovery intervention implemented at the completion of Session 1. Participants performed all interventions involving: passive recovery, active recovery (ACT), cold water immersion (CWI) and contrast water therapy (C(T)WT). No significant differences (p > 0.05) were evident between conditions for exercise performance (vertical jump, 20-m sprint, 10-m sprint, total circuit time) during Session 2. Effect size data indicated trends for an ameliorated decline in 5 x 20-m sprints and vertical jump for C(T)WT and CWI, respectively. C(T)WT demonstrated a significant reduction (p = 0.04) in lactate post-intervention compared to ACT recovery. Further, ACT recovery resulted in a significantly elevated (p < 0.01) heart rate compared to all other conditions postintervention and demonstrated significantly higher (p < 0.01) rating of perceived exertion postintervention and muscle soreness pre-exercise Session 2. It is likely that while interventions may be applicable to team sport practices, the 24-hour recovery period between exercise bouts was sufficient to allow performance to be maintained, regardless of recovery interventions.
本研究的目的是比较在连续几天进行模拟团队运动、间歇性冲刺运动后的四种恢复干预措施。十名女子无挡板篮球运动员连续四天进行了四次模拟无挡板篮球练习循环的随机训练。每个条件包括两个相同的训练(训练1和训练2),在训练1结束时实施恢复干预措施。参与者进行了所有干预措施,包括:被动恢复、主动恢复(ACT)、冷水浸泡(CWI)和对比水疗法(C(T)WT)。在训练2期间,各条件下的运动表现(垂直跳、20米冲刺、10米冲刺、总循环时间)之间没有显著差异(p>0.05)。效应量数据表明,C(T)WT和CWI分别在5次20米冲刺和垂直跳方面有改善下降趋势。与ACT恢复相比,C(T)WT干预后乳酸水平显著降低(p=0.04)。此外,与所有其他干预后的条件相比,ACT恢复导致干预后的心率显著升高(p<0.01),并且干预后的主观用力感觉评分和训练2前的肌肉酸痛程度显著更高(p<0.01)。虽然这些干预措施可能适用于团队运动训练,但运动回合之间24小时的恢复期足以维持运动表现,无论采用何种恢复干预措施。