School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Whiteknights, PO Box 238, Reading, RG6 6AL, UK.
Genes Nutr. 2009 Dec;4(4):227-42. doi: 10.1007/s12263-009-0135-4. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
Evidence in support of the neuroprotective effects of flavonoids has increased significantly in recent years, although to date much of this evidence has emerged from animal rather than human studies. Nonetheless, with a view to making recommendations for future good practice, we review 15 existing human dietary intervention studies that have examined the effects of particular types of flavonoid on cognitive performance. The studies employed a total of 55 different cognitive tests covering a broad range of cognitive domains. Most studies incorporated at least one measure of executive function/working memory, with nine reporting significant improvements in performance as a function of flavonoid supplementation compared to a control group. However, some domains were overlooked completely (e.g. implicit memory, prospective memory), and for the most part there was little consistency in terms of the particular cognitive tests used making across study comparisons difficult. Furthermore, there was some confusion concerning what aspects of cognitive function particular tests were actually measuring. Overall, while initial results are encouraging, future studies need to pay careful attention when selecting cognitive measures, especially in terms of ensuring that tasks are actually sensitive enough to detect treatment effects.
近年来,支持类黄酮神经保护作用的证据显著增加,尽管迄今为止,这些证据大多来自动物研究而非人类研究。尽管如此,为了提出未来良好实践的建议,我们回顾了 15 项现有的人类饮食干预研究,这些研究检查了特定类型的类黄酮对认知表现的影响。这些研究共使用了 55 种不同的认知测试,涵盖了广泛的认知领域。大多数研究都至少包含一项执行功能/工作记忆的测量,其中 9 项报告说,与对照组相比,类黄酮补充剂的补充显著提高了表现。然而,一些领域完全被忽视(例如内隐记忆、前瞻性记忆),而且在很大程度上,使用的特定认知测试没有一致性,使得跨研究比较变得困难。此外,关于特定测试实际上在测量认知功能的哪些方面,还存在一些混淆。总的来说,尽管初步结果令人鼓舞,但未来的研究在选择认知测量时需要格外注意,特别是在确保任务实际上足够敏感以检测治疗效果方面。