• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经肛门痔动脉结扎术:一项系统评价。

Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization: a systematic review.

作者信息

Giordano Pasquale, Overton John, Madeddu Francesco, Zaman Sabir, Gravante Gianpiero

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Whipps Cross University Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Sep;52(9):1665-71. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181af50f4.

DOI:10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181af50f4
PMID:19690499
Abstract

PURPOSE

Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization consists of a Doppler-guided ligation of the distal branches of the rectal arteries. The aim of this review is to assess the current evidence on dearterialization, establish the safety and efficacy of the technique, define its indications, and identify its possible advantages and limitations.

METHODS

All published studies on dearterialization without language restrictions were reviewed systematically. Primary outcome measures were postoperative pain and hemorrhoidal recurrences.

RESULTS

Seventeen articles including a total of 1,996 patients were analyzed. In general, the quality of the studies was low. Operating time ranged between 5 and 50 minutes. Hospital stay was one day for most patients, whereas the return to normal activities was between two and three days in most cases. Postoperative pain was present in 18.5% of patients. Three patients experienced significant postoperative hemorrhages. There were no other major complications. The overall recurrence rate was 9.0% for prolapse, 7.8% for bleeding, and 4.7% for pain at defecation. The recurrence rate at one year or more was 10.8% for prolapse, 9.7% for bleeding, and 8.7% for pain at defecation. When reported as a function of the hemorrhoidal grade, the recurrence rate was higher for fourth-degree hemorrhoids (range, 11.1-59.3%).

CONCLUSION

Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization appears to be a potential treatment option for second-degree and third-degree hemorrhoids. Clinical trials and longer follow-up comparing it with other procedures used to treat hemorrhoids are needed to establish a possible role for this technique.

摘要

目的

经肛门痔动脉结扎术是在多普勒引导下结扎直肠动脉的远端分支。本综述的目的是评估当前关于痔动脉结扎术的证据,确定该技术的安全性和有效性,明确其适应证,并找出其可能的优点和局限性。

方法

系统回顾了所有已发表的关于痔动脉结扎术的研究,无语言限制。主要结局指标为术后疼痛和痔复发情况。

结果

分析了17篇文章,共纳入1996例患者。总体而言,研究质量较低。手术时间为5至50分钟。大多数患者住院时间为1天,而在大多数情况下,恢复正常活动的时间为2至3天。18.5%的患者出现术后疼痛。3例患者发生了严重的术后出血。无其他严重并发症。脱垂的总体复发率为9.0%,出血为7.8%,排便疼痛为4.7%。脱垂、出血和排便疼痛在1年及以上的复发率分别为10.8%、9.7%和8.7%。按痔分级报告时,Ⅳ度痔的复发率较高(范围为11.1% - 59.3%)。

结论

经肛门痔动脉结扎术似乎是Ⅱ度和Ⅲ度痔的一种潜在治疗选择。需要进行临床试验并进行更长时间的随访,将其与其他治疗痔的方法进行比较,以确定该技术可能发挥的作用。

相似文献

1
Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization: a systematic review.经肛门痔动脉结扎术:一项系统评价。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Sep;52(9):1665-71. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181af50f4.
2
Stapled haemorrhoidectomy (haemorrhoidopexy) for the treatment of haemorrhoids: a systematic review and economic evaluation.吻合器痔切除术(痔固定术)治疗痔疮:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Apr;12(8):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-193. doi: 10.3310/hta12080.
3
Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids.吻合器痔上黏膜环切术与传统手术治疗痔疮的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;2006(4):CD005393. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005393.pub2.
4
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
5
Coblation versus other surgical techniques for tonsillectomy.用于扁桃体切除术的低温等离子消融术与其他手术技术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 22;8(8):CD004619. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004619.pub3.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
Catheter-Directed Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization Technique for the Management of Hemorrhoids: A Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Evidence.经导管痔动脉结扎术治疗痔疮:临床证据的荟萃分析。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021 Aug;32(8):1119-1127. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2021.03.548. Epub 2021 May 7.
8
Recurrence Rates and Pharmacological Treatment for Hemorrhoidal Disease: A Systematic Review.痔病的复发率和药物治疗:系统评价。
Adv Ther. 2023 Jan;40(1):117-132. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02351-7. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
10
Conventional versus LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy for patients with symptomatic Hemorrhoids.有症状痔患者的传统痔切除术与LigaSure痔切除术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;2009(1):CD006761. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006761.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Postoperative Perianal Abscess and Concomitant Anorectal Fistula: An Extremely Rare Complication After Emergency Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization With Mucopexy for Hemorrhoidal Disease.术后肛周脓肿合并肛瘘:痔病急诊经肛门痔动脉结扎术加黏膜固定术后极为罕见的并发症
Case Rep Surg. 2025 Aug 8;2025:1465838. doi: 10.1155/cris/1465838. eCollection 2025.
2
Haemorrhoidal artery ligation: Is Doppler guidance useful? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.痔动脉结扎术:多普勒引导是否有用?一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2025 Jul;27(7):e70163. doi: 10.1111/codi.70163.
3
Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation for the Treatment of Grade II-III Hemorrhoids: Is it Worth the Use of Doppler Guide in Long-Term Follow-Up?: A Single-Center Cohort Study.
痔动脉结扎术治疗Ⅱ-Ⅲ度痔:在长期随访中使用多普勒引导是否值得?一项单中心队列研究
Ann Surg Open. 2023 Jun 8;4(2):e296. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000296. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Results of sclerotherapy and mucopexy with haemorrhoidal dearterialization in II and III degree haemorrhoids. A 4 years' single centre experience.硬化疗法联合痔动脉结扎术及黏膜固定术治疗Ⅱ、Ⅲ度痔疮的效果:一项为期4年的单中心经验。
Front Surg. 2023 Jun 19;10:1151327. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1151327. eCollection 2023.
5
Hemorrhoid laser dearterialization: systematic review and meta-analysis.痔激光去动脉化:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lasers Med Sci. 2023 Jan 25;38(1):54. doi: 10.1007/s10103-022-03703-z.
6
Early and midterm results of radiofrequency ablation (Rafaelo procedure) for third-degree haemorrhoids: a prospective, two-centre study.痔疮射频消融术(Rafaelo 手术)治疗三度痔的早期和中期疗效:一项前瞻性、双中心研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Jun;26(6):479-487. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02608-x. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
7
The Laser Therapy for Hemorrhoidal Disease: A Prospective Study.痔病的激光治疗:一项前瞻性研究。
Cureus. 2021 Nov 12;13(11):e19497. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19497. eCollection 2021 Nov.
8
Superior Rectal Artery Embolisation for Haemorrhoids: What Do We Know So Far?直肠上动脉栓塞治疗痔疮:目前我们了解多少?
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021 May;44(5):675-685. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02733-w. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
9
Non-Doppler hemorrhoidal artery ligation and hemorrhoidopexy combined with pudendal nerve block for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.非多普勒痔动脉结扎联合痔固定术联合阴部神经阻滞治疗痔病:一项非劣效性随机对照试验。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Feb;36(2):353-363. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03768-8. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
10
Improvement in Hemorrhoidal Disease Surgery Outcomes Using a New Anatomical/Clinical-Therapeutic Classification (A/CTC).使用新的解剖学/临床治疗分类法(A/CTC)改善痔病手术效果。
Surg J (N Y). 2020 Sep 10;6(3):e145-e152. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1712542. eCollection 2020 Jul.