GGZ Drenthe, Mental Health Care, Assen, The Netherlands.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;45(8):819-26. doi: 10.1007/s00127-009-0123-4. Epub 2009 Aug 22.
Psychotropic drug use in Europe and the USA has increased in the past 20 years. The rise in mental health-care use instigated a debate about possible differences in prevalence rates between different ethnic groups in the Netherlands, although the exact differences were unknown. The aim of this study was to determine whether these minority groups were more or less likely than the native population to receive psychotropic drugs.
A descriptive population study was conducted using the Agis Health Database, containing demographic and health-care consumption data of approximately 1.5 million inhabitants of the Netherlands. Rates of prescriptions of psychotropic drugs from 2001 to 2006 and adjusted odds ratios for psychotropic drug prescriptions among native Dutch, Turkish and Moroccan ethnic groups were calculated. These data were analysed using logistic regression, after being adjusted for age, gender and socioeconomic status.
The mean year prevalence of psychotropic drug prescriptions from 2001 to 2006 was 14.0%. Except for a decrease in anxiolytic drugs, the prescriptions of psychotropic drugs increased from 2001 to 2006. These trends were the same for all of the ethnic groups considered. Among both the Moroccan and Turkish populations, there was a higher risk of antidepressant and antipsychotic drug prescriptions, and a pronounced lower risk of ADHD medication and lithium prescriptions compared to the native population. Among the Turkish population, the risk of anxiolytic drug prescriptions was greater than in the native population.
Compared to the native population in the Netherlands, first- and second-generation Turkish and Moroccan immigrants had an increased risk of antidepressant and antipsychotic drug prescriptions and a decreased risk of ADHD medication and Lithium prescriptions. Further research is needed to clarify whether patients of different ethnic backgrounds with the same symptoms receive similar diagnosis and adequate treatment.
在过去的 20 年中,欧洲和美国的精神药物使用有所增加。精神保健服务使用率的上升引发了一场关于荷兰不同族裔群体之间可能存在的患病率差异的争论,尽管确切的差异尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定这些少数群体是否比本地人群更有可能或更不可能接受精神药物治疗。
使用 Agis 健康数据库进行描述性人群研究,该数据库包含荷兰约 150 万居民的人口统计学和医疗保健消费数据。计算了 2001 年至 2006 年精神药物处方的比率以及荷兰本地人、土耳其人和摩洛哥人族群中精神药物处方的调整优势比。使用逻辑回归分析这些数据,调整了年龄、性别和社会经济地位。
2001 年至 2006 年,精神药物处方的平均年患病率为 14.0%。除了抗焦虑药物的使用减少外,精神药物的处方从 2001 年到 2006 年有所增加。这些趋势在所有考虑的族群中都是相同的。与本地人群相比,摩洛哥和土耳其人群中抗抑郁药和抗精神病药的处方风险更高,而 ADHD 药物和锂的处方风险明显降低。在土耳其人群中,抗焦虑药物的处方风险高于本地人群。
与荷兰本地人群相比,第一代和第二代土耳其和摩洛哥移民使用抗抑郁药和抗精神病药的风险增加,而使用 ADHD 药物和锂的风险降低。需要进一步研究以阐明具有相同症状的不同族裔背景的患者是否接受相同的诊断和充分的治疗。