• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症患者及其照护者保护性缓冲的人际内和人际后果。

Intrapersonal and interpersonal consequences of protective buffering among cancer patients and caregivers.

作者信息

Langer Shelby L, Brown Jonathon D, Syrjala Karen L

机构信息

School of Social Work, Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2009 Sep 15;115(18 Suppl):4311-25. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24586.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.24586
PMID:19731352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2762643/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Protective buffering refers to hiding cancer-related thoughts and concerns from one's spouse or partner. In this study, the authors examined the intrapersonal and interpersonal consequences of protective buffering and the motivations for such behavior (desire to shield partner from distress, desire to shield self from distress).

METHODS

Eighty hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients and their spousal caregivers/partners completed measures that were designed to assess protective buffering and relationship satisfaction at 2 time points: before transplantation (T1) and 50 days after transplantation (T2). Overall mental health also was assessed at T2.

RESULTS

There was moderate agreement between 1 dyad member's reported buffering of their partner and the partner's perception of the extent to which they felt buffered. Caregivers buffered patients more than patients buffered caregivers, especially at T2. The more participants buffered their partners at T2 and the more they felt buffered, the lower their concurrent relationship satisfaction and the poorer their mental health. The latter effect was particularly true for patients who buffered and for patients who felt buffered. With respect to motivations, patients who buffered primarily to protect their partner at T1 reported increases in relationship satisfaction over time; however, when they did so at T2, their caregiver reported concurrent decreases in relationship satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Protective buffering is costly, in that those who buffer and those who feel buffered report adverse psychosocial outcomes. In addition, buffering enacted by patients with an intention to help may prove counterproductive, ultimately hurting the object of such protection.

摘要

背景

保护性缓冲是指对配偶或伴侣隐瞒与癌症相关的想法和担忧。在本研究中,作者考察了保护性缓冲的个人内部和人际影响以及这种行为的动机(保护伴侣免受痛苦的愿望、保护自己免受痛苦的愿望)。

方法

80名造血干细胞移植受者及其配偶护理者/伴侣在两个时间点完成了旨在评估保护性缓冲和关系满意度的测量:移植前(T1)和移植后50天(T2)。在T2时还评估了总体心理健康状况。

结果

二元组中一方报告的对其伴侣的缓冲与伴侣对自己被缓冲程度的感知之间存在中等程度的一致性。护理者对患者的缓冲多于患者对护理者的缓冲,尤其是在T2时。在T2时,参与者对其伴侣的缓冲越多,且他们感觉自己被缓冲的程度越高,他们当时的关系满意度就越低,心理健康状况也越差。后一种影响在进行缓冲的患者和感觉自己被缓冲的患者中尤为明显。关于动机,在T1时主要为保护伴侣而进行缓冲的患者报告随着时间推移关系满意度有所提高;然而,当他们在T2时这样做时,其护理者报告关系满意度同时下降。

结论

保护性缓冲代价高昂,因为进行缓冲的人和感觉自己被缓冲的人都报告了不良的心理社会结果。此外,患者出于帮助目的而进行的缓冲可能会适得其反,最终伤害到这种保护的对象。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99e4/2762643/1588c21733da/nihms124440f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99e4/2762643/db7db0168056/nihms124440f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99e4/2762643/7960d0ed9f3b/nihms124440f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99e4/2762643/bc9729734a8f/nihms124440f3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99e4/2762643/1588c21733da/nihms124440f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99e4/2762643/db7db0168056/nihms124440f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99e4/2762643/7960d0ed9f3b/nihms124440f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99e4/2762643/bc9729734a8f/nihms124440f3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99e4/2762643/1588c21733da/nihms124440f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Intrapersonal and interpersonal consequences of protective buffering among cancer patients and caregivers.癌症患者及其照护者保护性缓冲的人际内和人际后果。
Cancer. 2009 Sep 15;115(18 Suppl):4311-25. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24586.
2
Protective buffering and psychological distress among couples coping with breast cancer: The moderating role of relationship satisfaction.应对乳腺癌的夫妻中的保护性缓冲与心理困扰:关系满意度的调节作用
J Fam Psychol. 2007 Sep;21(3):380-8. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.3.380.
3
Daily received support and relational functioning in HCT survivors and their caregivers.接受每日支持和关系功能的造血干细胞移植幸存者及其照顾者。
Psychooncology. 2020 Aug;29(8):1329-1337. doi: 10.1002/pon.5440. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
4
Social support as predictor of anxiety and depression in cancer caregivers six months after cancer diagnosis: A longitudinal study.癌症诊断后六个月癌症照顾者焦虑和抑郁的预测因素:一项纵向研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Mar;29(5-6):996-1002. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15123. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
5
Protective buffering and emotional desynchrony among spousal caregivers of cancer patients.癌症患者配偶照顾者的保护性缓冲与情感不同步
Health Psychol. 2007 Sep;26(5):635-43. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.5.635.
6
Cancer patients with pain: the spouse/partner relationship and quality of life.癌症疼痛患者:配偶/伴侣关系与生活质量。
Cancer Nurs. 2011 Jan-Feb;34(1):13-23. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181efed43.
7
Effects of Social Support Source and Effectiveness on Stress Buffering After Stem Cell Transplant.干细胞移植后社会支持源和有效性对压力缓冲的影响。
Int J Behav Med. 2019 Aug;26(4):391-400. doi: 10.1007/s12529-019-09787-2.
8
Relationship satisfaction in couples confronted with colorectal cancer: the interplay of past and current spousal support.结直肠癌患者配偶关系满意度:过去和当前配偶支持的相互作用。
J Behav Med. 2011 Aug;34(4):288-97. doi: 10.1007/s10865-010-9311-7. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
9
Everyday protective buffering predicts intimacy and fear of cancer recurrence in couples coping with early-stage breast cancer.日常保护缓冲可预测早期乳腺癌患者伴侣的亲密关系和对癌症复发的恐惧。
Psychooncology. 2019 Feb;28(2):317-323. doi: 10.1002/pon.4942. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
10
Hiding feelings for whose sake? Attachment avoidance, relationship connectedness, and protective buffering intentions.为了谁而隐藏感情?依恋回避、关系联结与保护性缓冲意图。
Emotion. 2017 Sep;17(6):965-980. doi: 10.1037/emo0000291. Epub 2017 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
"Your whole life is turned upside down": a reflexive thematic analysis identifying recommendations for designing and conducting qualitative research with cancer caregivers.“你的整个生活都被颠覆了”:一项反思性主题分析,确定了针对癌症护理者进行定性研究的设计与实施的建议。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 May 6;33(6):453. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09493-8.
2
Family Resilience in Adult Oncology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.成人肿瘤学中的家庭复原力:系统评价与荟萃分析
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2025 Apr 23;52(3):228-240. doi: 10.1188/25.ONF.228-240.
3
The Relational Experience of Fear of Cancer Recurrence in Family Caregivers: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis Study.家庭照顾者对癌症复发恐惧的关系体验:一项反思性主题分析研究。
Curr Oncol. 2025 Apr 1;32(4):209. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32040209.
4
Strategies for recruitment and retention of diverse and underserved cancer survivor and caregiver dyads in clinical trials.在临床试验中招募和留住多样化及服务不足的癌症幸存者和护理者二元组的策略。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2025 Jan 7;44:101425. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101425. eCollection 2025 Apr.
5
Parenting and Family Concerns of Couples Navigating Advanced Breast Cancer: Exploring Discussions Around Parenting Challenges and Targets for Intervention.应对晚期乳腺癌的夫妻的育儿及家庭问题:探讨围绕育儿挑战及干预目标的讨论
Psychooncology. 2025 Jan;34(1):e70069. doi: 10.1002/pon.70069.
6
Healthcare Professionals' Views of Supportive Care Needs for Chinese, Korean, and Vietnamese Americans with Metastatic Cancer.医疗保健专业人员对患有转移性癌症的华裔、韩裔和越南裔美国人支持性护理需求的看法。
Asian Am J Psychol. 2024 Sep;15(3):233-245. doi: 10.1037/aap0000329.
7
Couple communication in cancer: A tale of two conceptual models.癌症中的夫妻沟通:两种概念模型的故事。
Health Psychol. 2024 Dec;43(12):875-885. doi: 10.1037/hea0001396. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
8
Psychological care for cancer survivors: a 2 × 2 model of interpersonal emotion regulation by caregivers.癌症幸存者的心理护理:护理人员人际情绪调节的2×2模型
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 24;15:1390692. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1390692. eCollection 2024.
9
What patients with advanced cancer experience as helpful in navigating their life with a long-term response: a qualitative study.晚期癌症患者认为有助于长期应对生活的因素:一项定性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Mar 12;32(4):222. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08398-2.
10
The Association between Relationship Satisfaction Concordance and Breast Cancer Survivors' Physical and Psychosocial Well-Being.关系满意度一致性与乳腺癌幸存者身心健康之间的关联
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 8;12(2):134. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12020134.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of life of family caregivers of cancer survivors: across the trajectory of the illness.癌症幸存者家庭照顾者的生活质量:贯穿疾病轨迹
Cancer. 2008 Jun 1;112(11 Suppl):2556-68. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23449.
2
Relationship satisfaction in women: a longitudinal case-control study about the role of breast cancer, personal assertiveness, and partners' relationship-focused coping.女性的关系满意度:一项关于乳腺癌、个人自信以及伴侣以关系为中心应对方式作用的纵向病例对照研究。
Br J Health Psychol. 2008 Nov;13(Pt 4):737-54. doi: 10.1348/135910707X252431. Epub 2007 Nov 12.
3
Protective buffering and psychological distress among couples coping with breast cancer: The moderating role of relationship satisfaction.应对乳腺癌的夫妻中的保护性缓冲与心理困扰:关系满意度的调节作用
J Fam Psychol. 2007 Sep;21(3):380-8. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.3.380.
4
Protective buffering and emotional desynchrony among spousal caregivers of cancer patients.癌症患者配偶照顾者的保护性缓冲与情感不同步
Health Psychol. 2007 Sep;26(5):635-43. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.5.635.
5
Late effects of cancer and hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation on spouses or partners compared with survivors and survivor-matched controls.与癌症幸存者及幸存者匹配对照相比,癌症和造血干细胞移植对配偶或伴侣的远期影响。
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Apr 10;25(11):1403-11. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.5705.
6
Explaining family caregiver role strain following autologous blood and marrow transplantation.解释自体血液和骨髓移植后家庭照顾者的角色压力。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2006;24(3):53-74. doi: 10.1300/J077v24n03_03.
7
Spontaneous emotion regulation during evaluated speaking tasks: associations with negative affect, anxiety expression, memory, and physiological responding.在评估的口语任务中自发的情绪调节:与消极情绪、焦虑表达、记忆和生理反应的关联。
Emotion. 2006 Aug;6(3):356-66. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.6.3.356.
8
You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: consider the brief COPE.你想测量应对方式,但你的方案太长:可以考虑使用简易应对方式问卷。
Int J Behav Med. 1997;4(1):92-100. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6.
9
United we stand? The effects of a couple-coping intervention on adjustment to early stage breast or gynecological cancer.团结一心?夫妻应对干预对早期乳腺癌或妇科癌症适应情况的影响。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Dec;72(6):1122-35. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.6.1122.
10
Written emotional disclosure buffers the effects of social constraints on distress among cancer patients.书面情感表达可缓冲社会限制因素对癌症患者痛苦的影响。
Health Psychol. 2004 Nov;23(6):555-63. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.6.555.