Quick Brian L, Bates Benjamin R, Quinlan Margaret M
Department of Communication, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Health Commun. 2009 Sep;24(6):548-61. doi: 10.1080/10410230903104939.
This investigation examined antecedents associated with support for clean indoor air policies. Participants (N = 550) living in a Midwestern county (population = 62,223) were randomly sampled. Results suggest that beliefs in the health risks associated with secondhand smoke are positively associated with favorable attitudes toward clean indoor air policies, whereas trait reactance is negatively associated with these attitudes. Findings also indicate that risks and trait reactance are indirectly associated with support for clean indoor air policies, mediated through anger arousal toward exposure to secondhand smoke. In addition, regression analyses revealed that health risks, trait reactance, and smoking status explained a significant amount of variance regarding anger toward exposure to secondhand smoke, but only health risks and smoking status accounted for a significant amount of variance toward clean indoor air attitudes. Finally, the Smoking Status x Health Risks interaction was supported for anger toward exposure to secondhand smoke and favorable attitudes toward clean indoor air policies. Our findings suggest the incorporation of anger appeals when promoting clean indoor air policies.
本调查研究了与支持清洁室内空气政策相关的前因。居住在中西部一个县(人口 = 62,223)的参与者(N = 550)被随机抽样。结果表明,对二手烟健康风险的信念与对清洁室内空气政策的积极态度呈正相关,而特质反抗与这些态度呈负相关。研究结果还表明,风险和特质反抗通过对接触二手烟的愤怒唤起,与支持清洁室内空气政策间接相关。此外,回归分析显示,健康风险、特质反抗和吸烟状况解释了对接触二手烟愤怒的大量方差,但只有健康风险和吸烟状况解释了对清洁室内空气态度的大量方差。最后,吸烟状况×健康风险的交互作用在对接触二手烟的愤怒和对清洁室内空气政策的积极态度方面得到了支持。我们的研究结果表明,在推广清洁室内空气政策时应纳入愤怒诉求。