Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Alan Gilbert Building NNF Level 3, Carlton 3053, Australia.
Schizophr Bull. 2010 Jan;36(1):36-42. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbp094. Epub 2009 Sep 23.
It has recently been suggested that the diagnostic criteria of schizophrenia should include specific reference to cognitive impairments characterizing the disorder. Arguments in support of this assertion contend that such inclusion would not only serve to increase the awareness of cognitive deficits in affected patients, among both clinicians and researchers alike, but also increase the "point of rarity" between schizophrenia and mood disorders. The aim of the current article is to examine this latter assertion in light of the recent opinion piece provided by Keefe and Fenton (Keefe RSE, Fenton WS. How should DSM-V criteria for schizophrenia include cognitive impairment? Schizophr Bull. 2007;33:912-920). Through literature review, we explore the issue of whether cognitive deficits do in fact differentiate the major psychoses. The overall results of this inquiry suggest that inclusion of cognitive impairment criteria in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) (DSM-V) would not provide a major advancement in discriminating schizophrenia from bipolar disorder and affective psychoses. Therefore, while cognitive impairment should be included in DSM-V, it should not dictate diagnostic specificity--at least not until more comprehensive evidence-based reviews of the current diagnostic system have been undertaken. Based on this evidence, we consider several alternatives for the DSM-V definition of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia, including (1) the inclusion of cognitive impairment as a specifier and (2) the definition of cognitive impairment as a dimension within a hybrid categorical-dimensional system. Given the state of current evidence, these possibilities appear to represent the most parsimonious approaches to the inclusion of cognitive deficits in the diagnostic criteria of schizophrenia and, potentially, of mood disorders.
最近有人提出,精神分裂症的诊断标准应该包括对该疾病特征性认知障碍的具体参考。支持这一说法的论点认为,这种纳入不仅将有助于提高临床医生和研究人员对受影响患者认知缺陷的认识,而且还将增加精神分裂症和心境障碍之间的“罕见点”。本文的目的是根据 Keefe 和 Fenton(Keefe RSE,Fenton WS。DSM-V 精神分裂症标准应如何包括认知障碍?Schizophr Bull。2007;33:912-920)最近提供的观点文章来检验后者的说法。通过文献回顾,我们探讨了认知缺陷是否实际上可以区分主要精神病的问题。这项调查的总体结果表明,将认知障碍标准纳入《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第五版)(DSM-V)不会在区分精神分裂症与双相情感障碍和情感性精神病方面提供重大进展。因此,虽然认知障碍应该包含在 DSM-V 中,但它不应决定诊断的特异性-至少在对当前诊断系统进行更全面的基于证据的审查之前不应如此。基于这一证据,我们考虑了 DSM-V 中精神分裂症认知障碍定义的几种替代方案,包括(1)将认知障碍作为一个特征纳入,以及(2)将认知障碍定义为混合分类-维度系统中的一个维度。考虑到目前证据的状态,这些可能性似乎代表了在精神分裂症和潜在的心境障碍的诊断标准中纳入认知缺陷的最简约方法。