Yang Chun, Tang Dalin, Yuan Chun, Hatsukami Thomas S, Zheng Jie, Woodard Pamela K
Math Dept, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Comput Model Eng Sci. 2007 Jan 1;19(3):233-246.
It has been recognized that fluid-structure interactions (FSI) play an important role in cardiovascular disease initiation and development. However, in vivo MRI multi-component FSI models for human carotid atherosclerotic plaques with bifurcation and quantitative comparisons of FSI models with fluid-only or structure-only models are currently lacking in the literature. A 3D non-Newtonian multi-component FSI model based on in vivo/ex vivo MRI images for human atherosclerotic plaques was introduced to investigate flow and plaque stress/strain behaviors which may be related to plaque progression and rupture. Both artery wall and plaque components were assumed to be hyperelastic, isotropic, incompressible and homogeneous. Blood flow was assumed to be laminar, non-Newtonian, viscous and incompressible. In vivo/ex vivo MRI images were acquired using histologically-validated multi-spectral MRI protocols. The 3D FSI models were solved and results were compared with those from a Newtonian FSI model and wall-only/fluid-only models. A 145% difference in maximum principal stresses (Stress-P(1)) between the FSI and wall-only models and 40% difference in flow maximum shear stress (MSS) between the FSI and fluid-only models were found at the throat of the plaque using a severe plaque sample (70% severity by diameter). Flow maximum shear stress (MSS) from the rigid wall model is much higher (20-40% in maximum MSS values, 100-150% in stagnation region) than those from FSI models.
人们已经认识到,流固相互作用(FSI)在心血管疾病的发生和发展中起着重要作用。然而,目前文献中缺乏针对具有分叉的人类颈动脉粥样硬化斑块的体内MRI多组分FSI模型,以及FSI模型与仅流体或仅结构模型的定量比较。本文引入了一种基于体内/体外MRI图像的用于人类动脉粥样硬化斑块的三维非牛顿多组分FSI模型,以研究可能与斑块进展和破裂相关的血流和斑块应力/应变行为。动脉壁和斑块成分均假定为超弹性、各向同性、不可压缩且均匀的。血流假定为层流、非牛顿、粘性且不可压缩的。使用经过组织学验证的多光谱MRI协议采集体内/体外MRI图像。求解三维FSI模型,并将结果与牛顿FSI模型以及仅壁面/仅流体模型的结果进行比较。使用严重斑块样本(直径严重程度为70%)时,在斑块喉部发现FSI模型与仅壁面模型之间的最大主应力(应力-P(1))存在145%的差异,FSI模型与仅流体模型之间的血流最大剪应力(MSS)存在40%的差异。刚性壁模型的血流最大剪应力(MSS)比FSI模型高得多(最大MSS值高20 - 40%,停滞区域高100 - 150%)。