Suppr超能文献

特应性皮炎 IgE 高外在型和 IgE 正常内在型皮肤屏障功能和感觉神经电流感知阈值的比较。

Comparison of skin barrier function and sensory nerve electric current perception threshold between IgE-high extrinsic and IgE-normal intrinsic types of atopic dermatitis.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu 807-8555, Japan.

出版信息

Br J Dermatol. 2010 Jan;162(1):83-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09440.x. Epub 2009 Aug 12.

Abstract

Background Two types of atopic dermatitis (AD) have been proposed, with different pathophysiological mechanisms underlying this seemingly heterogeneous disorder. The extrinsic type shows high IgE levels presumably as a consequence of skin barrier damage and feasible allergen permeation, whereas the intrinsic type exhibits normal IgE levels and is not mediated by allergen-specific IgE. Objectives To investigate the relationship between pruritus perception threshold and skin barrier function of patients with AD in a comparison between the extrinsic and intrinsic types. Methods Enrolled in this study were 32 patients with extrinsic AD, 17 with intrinsic AD and 24 healthy individuals. The barrier function of the stratum corneum was assessed by skin surface hydration and transepidermal water loss (TEWL), and pruritus perception was evaluated by the electric current perception threshold (CPT) of sensory nerves upon neuroselective transcutaneous electric stimulation. Results Skin surface hydration was significantly lower and TEWL was significantly higher in extrinsic AD than intrinsic AD or normal controls. Although there was no statistically significant difference in CPT among extrinsic AD, intrinsic AD and normal controls, CPT was significantly correlated with skin surface hydration and inversely with TEWL in intrinsic AD and normal controls, but not extrinsic AD. Finally, CPT was correlated with the visual analogue scale of itch in the nonlesional skin of patients with extrinsic but not intrinsic AD. Conclusions Patients with extrinsic AD have an impaired barrier, which increases the pre-existing pruritus but rather decreases sensitivity to external stimuli. In contrast, patients with intrinsic AD retain a normal barrier function and sensory reactivity to external pruritic stimuli.

摘要

背景

特应性皮炎(AD)有两种类型,其不同的病理生理机制导致了这种看似异质性的疾病。外在型表现为 IgE 水平升高,推测是由于皮肤屏障损伤和过敏原渗透所致,而内在型则表现为 IgE 水平正常,且不受过敏原特异性 IgE 的介导。目的:在外在型和内在型 AD 患者中,比较瘙痒感知阈值与 AD 患者皮肤屏障功能的关系。方法:本研究纳入 32 例外在型 AD 患者、17 例内在型 AD 患者和 24 例健康对照者。采用皮肤表面水分和经皮水分丢失(TEWL)评估角质层屏障功能,采用经皮神经选择性电刺激的感觉神经电流感知阈值(CPT)评估瘙痒感知。结果:外在型 AD 的皮肤表面水分显著低于内在型 AD 和正常对照组,TEWL 显著高于内在型 AD 和正常对照组。尽管外在型 AD、内在型 AD 和正常对照组之间 CPT 无统计学差异,但内在型 AD 和正常对照组的 CPT 与皮肤表面水分呈显著正相关,与 TEWL 呈显著负相关,而外在型 AD 则无相关性。最后,外在型 AD 患者非皮损皮肤的 CPT 与瘙痒视觉模拟评分呈正相关,而内在型 AD 患者则无相关性。结论:外在型 AD 患者的屏障功能受损,增加了原有瘙痒,但对外界刺激的敏感性降低。相比之下,内在型 AD 患者的屏障功能和对外界瘙痒刺激的感觉反应正常。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验