• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of a rapid molecular method, the BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay, to the most frequently used laboratory tests for detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in diarrheal feces.比较快速分子方法,BD GeneOhm Cdiff 检测,与最常用于检测腹泻粪便中产毒艰难梭菌的实验室检测。
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Nov;47(11):3478-81. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01133-09. Epub 2009 Sep 30.
2
Comparison of a commercial real-time PCR assay for tcdB detection to a cell culture cytotoxicity assay and toxigenic culture for direct detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in clinical samples.用于检测tcdB的商业实时荧光定量PCR检测法与细胞培养细胞毒性检测法及产毒培养法在临床样本中直接检测产毒素艰难梭菌的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Feb;47(2):373-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01613-08. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
3
Comparison of BD GeneOhm Cdiff real-time PCR assay with a two-step algorithm and a toxin A/B enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of toxigenic Clostridium difficile infection.BD GeneOhm Cdiff 实时 PCR 检测法与两步法算法和毒素 A/B 酶联免疫吸附试验比较,用于诊断产毒艰难梭菌感染。
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Jan;48(1):109-14. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01630-09. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
4
Comparison of two commercial molecular assays to a laboratory-developed molecular assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.比较两种商业分子检测方法与实验室开发的分子检测方法在诊断艰难梭菌感染中的应用。
J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Feb;49(2):725-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01028-10. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
5
Evaluation of a new molecular test, the BD Max Cdiff, for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in fecal samples.评估一种新的分子检测方法,BD Max Cdiff,用于检测粪便样本中的产毒艰难梭菌。
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Sep;50(9):3089-90. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01250-12. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
6
Comparison of commercial molecular assays for toxigenic Clostridium difficile detection in stools: BD GeneOhm Cdiff, XPert C. difficile and illumigene C. difficile.商用分子检测方法在粪便中产毒艰难梭菌检测的比较:BD GeneOhm Cdiff、Xpert C. difficile 和 illumigene C. difficile。
J Microbiol Methods. 2012 Aug;90(2):83-5. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2012.04.017. Epub 2012 Apr 28.
7
Comparison of BD GeneOhm Cdiff and Seegene Seeplex ACE PCR assays using toxigenic Clostridium difficile culture for direct detection of tcdB from stool specimens.使用产毒艰难梭菌培养物直接检测粪便标本中 tcdB 的 BD GeneOhm Cdiff 和 Seegene Seeplex ACE PCR 检测比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Nov;50(11):3765-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01440-12. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
8
Premarket evaluations of the IMDx C. difficile for Abbott m2000 Assay and the BD Max Cdiff Assay.针对雅培m2000分析系统的IMDx艰难梭菌检测和BD Max艰难梭菌检测的上市前评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 2014 May;52(5):1423-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03293-13. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
9
Algorithm combining toxin immunoassay and stool culture for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.结合毒素免疫测定和粪便培养诊断艰难梭菌感染的算法
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Sep;47(9):2952-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00609-09. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
10
Evaluation of the fully automated BD MAX Cdiff and Xpert C. difficile assays for direct detection of Clostridium difficile in stool specimens.评估 BD MAX Cdiff 和 Xpert C. difficile 全自动检测系统在粪便样本中直接检测艰难梭菌的性能。
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Jun;51(6):1906-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00344-13. Epub 2013 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Overview of current detection methods and microRNA potential in infection screening. 感染筛查中当前检测方法和 microRNA 潜力概述。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jun 14;29(22):3385-3399. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i22.3385.
2
A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) and Algorithms Including NAATs for the Diagnosis of () in Adults.一项关于核酸扩增检测(NAATs)和包括 NAATs 在内的算法在诊断成人()中的实验室医学最佳实践系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019 May 29;32(3). doi: 10.1128/CMR.00032-18. Print 2019 Jun 19.
3
Comparison of BD Max Cdiff and GenomEra C. difficile molecular assays for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile from stools in conventional sample containers and in FecalSwabs.BD Max艰难梭菌检测法与GenomEra艰难梭菌分子检测法在常规样本容器及粪便拭子中粪便样本中产毒艰难梭菌检测方面的比较
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 May;34(5):1005-9. doi: 10.1007/s10096-015-2320-2. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
4
C. difficile ribotype 027 or 176?艰难梭菌核糖体分型027还是176?
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2014 Nov;59(6):523-6. doi: 10.1007/s12223-014-0323-5. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
5
Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: comparison of four methods on specimens collected in Cary-Blair transport medium and tcdB PCR on fresh versus frozen samples.艰难梭菌感染的诊断:对在 Cary-Blair 转运培养基中收集的标本采用四种方法的比较以及对新鲜与冷冻样本进行 tcdB 聚合酶链反应
Infect Dis Rep. 2011 May 5;3(1):e5. doi: 10.4081/idr.2011.e5. eCollection 2011 Mar 8.
6
Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease: role in pathogenesis and implications in treatment.艰难梭菌与炎症性肠病:在发病机制中的作用及其在治疗中的意义。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov 21;19(43):7577-85. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i43.7577.
7
Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: an ongoing conundrum for clinicians and for clinical laboratories.艰难梭菌感染的诊断:临床医生和临床实验室面临的持续难题。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013 Jul;26(3):604-30. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00016-13.
8
Evaluation of a new automated homogeneous PCR assay, GenomEra C. difficile, for rapid detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in fecal specimens.评价一种新型自动化均相 PCR 检测法,GenomEra C. difficile,用于快速检测粪便标本中的产毒艰难梭菌。
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Sep;51(9):2908-12. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01083-13. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
9
Comparison of BD GeneOhm Cdiff and Seegene Seeplex ACE PCR assays using toxigenic Clostridium difficile culture for direct detection of tcdB from stool specimens.使用产毒艰难梭菌培养物直接检测粪便标本中 tcdB 的 BD GeneOhm Cdiff 和 Seegene Seeplex ACE PCR 检测比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Nov;50(11):3765-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01440-12. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
10
Molecular techniques for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.分子技术在艰难梭菌感染诊断中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2012 Jul;87(7):643-51. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.02.024.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of a commercial real-time PCR assay for tcdB detection to a cell culture cytotoxicity assay and toxigenic culture for direct detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in clinical samples.用于检测tcdB的商业实时荧光定量PCR检测法与细胞培养细胞毒性检测法及产毒培养法在临床样本中直接检测产毒素艰难梭菌的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Feb;47(2):373-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01613-08. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
2
Comparison of real-time PCR for detection of the tcdC gene with four toxin immunoassays and culture in diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.实时荧光定量PCR检测tcdC基因与四种毒素免疫测定法及培养法在艰难梭菌感染诊断中的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Jun;46(6):1996-2001. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00032-08. Epub 2008 Apr 23.
3
Detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in stool samples by real-time polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of C. difficile-associated diarrhea.通过实时聚合酶链反应检测粪便样本中产毒素艰难梭菌以诊断艰难梭菌相关性腹泻。
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Nov 1;45(9):1152-60. doi: 10.1086/522185. Epub 2007 Sep 25.
4
Antimicrobial drugs and community-acquired Clostridium difficile-associated disease, UK.抗菌药物与社区获得性艰难梭菌相关疾病,英国
Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 May;13(5):761-3. doi: 10.3201/eid1305.061124.
5
Evaluation of real-time PCR and conventional diagnostic methods for the detection of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea in a prospective multicentre study.一项前瞻性多中心研究中实时荧光定量PCR与传统诊断方法用于艰难梭菌相关性腹泻检测的评估
J Med Microbiol. 2007 Jan;56(Pt 1):36-42. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46680-0.
6
An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile.一种艰难梭菌的流行、毒素基因变异菌株。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 8;353(23):2433-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051590. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
7
A predominantly clonal multi-institutional outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea with high morbidity and mortality.艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的多机构主要克隆性暴发,发病率和死亡率高。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 8;353(23):2442-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051639. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
8
Prospective multicenter evaluation of a new immunoassay and real-time PCR for rapid diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in hospitalized patients.一项针对新免疫测定法和实时聚合酶链反应在住院患者艰难梭菌相关性腹泻快速诊断中的前瞻性多中心评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Oct;43(10):5338-40. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.10.5338-5340.2005.
9
Toxin production by an emerging strain of Clostridium difficile associated with outbreaks of severe disease in North America and Europe.一种新出现的艰难梭菌菌株产生毒素,该菌株与北美和欧洲的严重疾病暴发有关。
Lancet. 2005;366(9491):1079-84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67420-X.
10
Increasing risk of relapse after treatment of Clostridium difficile colitis in Quebec, Canada.加拿大魁北克艰难梭菌结肠炎治疗后复发风险增加。
Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Jun 1;40(11):1591-7. doi: 10.1086/430315. Epub 2005 Apr 25.

比较快速分子方法,BD GeneOhm Cdiff 检测,与最常用于检测腹泻粪便中产毒艰难梭菌的实验室检测。

Comparison of a rapid molecular method, the BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay, to the most frequently used laboratory tests for detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in diarrheal feces.

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Microbiology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical and Pharmaceutical Center, H-6725 Szeged, Semmelweis u 6., Hungary.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Nov;47(11):3478-81. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01133-09. Epub 2009 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1128/JCM.01133-09
PMID:19794052
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2772624/
Abstract

Six hundred diarrheal stool specimens were collected from inpatients and outpatients at local university hospitals for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile using three parallel methods, the BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay, the tissue culture cytotoxicity assay, and a commercially available enzyme-linked fluorescence immunoassay (ELFA) (Vidas C. difficile toxin A and B assay; bioMérieux). Toxigenic C. difficile culture was also performed to further clarify discordant results. During a 3-month study period, 58 (9.7%) of the 600 diarrheal samples examined were positive by the BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay, while the Vidas C. difficile toxin A and B assay and the cytotoxicity assay performed directly on stool samples gave 4.7% and 6.3% positivity rates, respectively. In the case of four samples, BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay results were not evaluable at first because of the presence of PCR inhibitors, but upon repeat testing from the frozen lysates, all of these samples proved to be negative. After resolution with toxigenic culture, the cytotoxicity assay proved to be positive in 55 samples (9.2%), while the ELFA was positive in 37 samples (6.2%). Results of culture and repeated cytotoxicity assays emphasized the importance of the culture method, because the use of ELFA or enzyme immunoassay without a culture method may lead to a substantial portion of toxigenic C. difficile strains being missed.

摘要

从当地大学医院的住院患者和门诊患者中采集了 600 份腹泻粪便标本,使用三种平行方法检测产毒艰难梭菌,即 BD GeneOhm Cdiff 检测法、组织培养细胞毒性检测法和市售酶联荧光免疫测定法(VIDAS C. difficile 毒素 A 和 B 检测法;生物梅里埃)。还进行了产毒艰难梭菌培养,以进一步澄清不一致的结果。在 3 个月的研究期间,600 份腹泻样本中,BD GeneOhm Cdiff 检测法检测出 58 份(9.7%)阳性,而直接在粪便样本上进行的 VIDAS C. difficile 毒素 A 和 B 检测法和细胞毒性检测法的阳性率分别为 4.7%和 6.3%。在 4 个样本中,BD GeneOhm Cdiff 检测法的结果最初因存在 PCR 抑制剂而无法评估,但对冷冻裂解物进行重复检测后,所有这些样本均为阴性。经产毒培养解决后,细胞毒性检测法在 55 个样本中呈阳性(9.2%),而酶联免疫吸附测定法在 37 个样本中呈阳性(6.2%)。培养和重复细胞毒性检测法的结果强调了培养方法的重要性,因为不使用培养方法而仅使用酶联免疫吸附测定法或酶免疫测定法可能会导致大量产毒艰难梭菌菌株被遗漏。