Suppr超能文献

比较快速分子方法,BD GeneOhm Cdiff 检测,与最常用于检测腹泻粪便中产毒艰难梭菌的实验室检测。

Comparison of a rapid molecular method, the BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay, to the most frequently used laboratory tests for detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in diarrheal feces.

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Microbiology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical and Pharmaceutical Center, H-6725 Szeged, Semmelweis u 6., Hungary.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Nov;47(11):3478-81. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01133-09. Epub 2009 Sep 30.

Abstract

Six hundred diarrheal stool specimens were collected from inpatients and outpatients at local university hospitals for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile using three parallel methods, the BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay, the tissue culture cytotoxicity assay, and a commercially available enzyme-linked fluorescence immunoassay (ELFA) (Vidas C. difficile toxin A and B assay; bioMérieux). Toxigenic C. difficile culture was also performed to further clarify discordant results. During a 3-month study period, 58 (9.7%) of the 600 diarrheal samples examined were positive by the BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay, while the Vidas C. difficile toxin A and B assay and the cytotoxicity assay performed directly on stool samples gave 4.7% and 6.3% positivity rates, respectively. In the case of four samples, BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay results were not evaluable at first because of the presence of PCR inhibitors, but upon repeat testing from the frozen lysates, all of these samples proved to be negative. After resolution with toxigenic culture, the cytotoxicity assay proved to be positive in 55 samples (9.2%), while the ELFA was positive in 37 samples (6.2%). Results of culture and repeated cytotoxicity assays emphasized the importance of the culture method, because the use of ELFA or enzyme immunoassay without a culture method may lead to a substantial portion of toxigenic C. difficile strains being missed.

摘要

从当地大学医院的住院患者和门诊患者中采集了 600 份腹泻粪便标本,使用三种平行方法检测产毒艰难梭菌,即 BD GeneOhm Cdiff 检测法、组织培养细胞毒性检测法和市售酶联荧光免疫测定法(VIDAS C. difficile 毒素 A 和 B 检测法;生物梅里埃)。还进行了产毒艰难梭菌培养,以进一步澄清不一致的结果。在 3 个月的研究期间,600 份腹泻样本中,BD GeneOhm Cdiff 检测法检测出 58 份(9.7%)阳性,而直接在粪便样本上进行的 VIDAS C. difficile 毒素 A 和 B 检测法和细胞毒性检测法的阳性率分别为 4.7%和 6.3%。在 4 个样本中,BD GeneOhm Cdiff 检测法的结果最初因存在 PCR 抑制剂而无法评估,但对冷冻裂解物进行重复检测后,所有这些样本均为阴性。经产毒培养解决后,细胞毒性检测法在 55 个样本中呈阳性(9.2%),而酶联免疫吸附测定法在 37 个样本中呈阳性(6.2%)。培养和重复细胞毒性检测法的结果强调了培养方法的重要性,因为不使用培养方法而仅使用酶联免疫吸附测定法或酶免疫测定法可能会导致大量产毒艰难梭菌菌株被遗漏。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
C. difficile ribotype 027 or 176?艰难梭菌核糖体分型027还是176?
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2014 Nov;59(6):523-6. doi: 10.1007/s12223-014-0323-5. Epub 2014 Jun 27.

本文引用的文献

6
An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile.一种艰难梭菌的流行、毒素基因变异菌株。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 8;353(23):2433-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051590. Epub 2005 Dec 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验