• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作环境中睡眠缺失易感性的个体差异。

Individual differences in vulnerability to sleep loss in the work environment.

机构信息

Sleep and Performance Research Center, Washington State University Spokane, P.O. Box 1495, Spokane, WA 99210, USA.

出版信息

Ind Health. 2009 Oct;47(5):518-26. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.47.518.

DOI:10.2486/indhealth.47.518
PMID:19834261
Abstract

There are considerable individual differences in cognitive performance deficits resulting from extended work hours and shift work schedules. Recent progress in sleep and performance research has yielded new insights into the causes and consequences of these individual differences. Neurobiological processes of sleep/wake regulation underlie trait individual variability in vulnerability to performance impairment due to sleep loss. Trait vulnerability to sleep loss is observed in the laboratory and in the work environment, even in occupational settings where (self-)selection pressures are high. In general, individuals do not seem to accurately assess the magnitude of their own vulnerability. Methods for identifying workers who are most at risk of sleep loss-related errors and accidents would therefore be helpful to target fatigue countermeasure interventions at those needing them most. As yet, no reliable predictors of vulnerability to sleep loss have been identified, although candidate genetic predictors have been proposed. However, a Bayesian forecasting technique based on closed-loop feedback of measured performance has been developed for individualized prediction of future performance impairment during ongoing operations. Judiciously selecting or monitoring individuals in specific tasks or occupations, within legally and ethically acceptable boundaries, has the potential to improve operational performance and productivity, reduce errors and accidents, and save lives. Trait individual variability in responses to sleep loss represents a major complication in the application of one-size-fits-all hours of service regulations--favoring instead modern fatigue risk management strategies, because these allow flexibility to account for individual vulnerability or resilience to the performance consequences of extended work hours and shift work schedules.

摘要

由于工作时间延长和轮班工作安排,认知表现缺陷存在相当大的个体差异。睡眠和表现研究的最新进展为这些个体差异的原因和后果提供了新的见解。睡眠/觉醒调节的神经生物学过程是由于睡眠不足导致表现受损的个体易感性的特征个体差异的基础。在实验室和工作环境中观察到对睡眠不足的易感性,即使在职业环境中(自我)选择压力很高。一般来说,个体似乎无法准确评估自己易感性的程度。因此,确定最容易因睡眠不足相关错误和事故而处于危险之中的工人的方法将有助于将疲劳对策干预措施针对最需要的人。尽管已经提出了候选基因预测因子,但到目前为止,还没有确定对睡眠不足易感性的可靠预测因子。然而,已经开发了一种基于测量性能闭环反馈的贝叶斯预测技术,用于在正在进行的操作中对未来表现受损进行个体化预测。在合法和道德可接受的范围内,明智地选择或监测特定任务或职业中的个体,有可能提高操作性能和生产力,减少错误和事故,并拯救生命。对睡眠不足的反应的个体差异是一刀切的服务时间法规应用的主要并发症——转而支持现代疲劳风险管理策略,因为这些策略允许灵活考虑到个体对延长工作时间和轮班工作安排的表现后果的易感性或弹性。

相似文献

1
Individual differences in vulnerability to sleep loss in the work environment.工作环境中睡眠缺失易感性的个体差异。
Ind Health. 2009 Oct;47(5):518-26. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.47.518.
2
Shift work and inter-individual differences in sleep and sleepiness.轮班工作与睡眠及嗜睡的个体差异
Chronobiol Int. 2006;23(6):1139-47. doi: 10.1080/07420520601100971.
3
Impacts of shift work on sleep and circadian rhythms.轮班工作对睡眠和昼夜节律的影响。
Pathol Biol (Paris). 2014 Oct;62(5):292-301. doi: 10.1016/j.patbio.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
4
Performance impairment consequent to sleep loss: determinants of resistance and susceptibility.睡眠缺失导致的表现能力下降:抵抗和易感性的决定因素。
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2009 Nov;15(6):559-64. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e3283319aad.
5
[Rest for safety: which stakes?].[为安全而休息:何种风险?]
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2007 Jul-Aug;26(7-8):638-48. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2007.03.007. Epub 2007 May 3.
6
Optimization of biomathematical model predictions for cognitive performance impairment in individuals: accounting for unknown traits and uncertain states in homeostatic and circadian processes.个体认知功能损害生物数学模型预测的优化:考虑稳态和昼夜节律过程中的未知特征和不确定状态。
Sleep. 2007 Sep;30(9):1129-43. doi: 10.1093/sleep/30.9.1129.
7
Individual differences in cognitive vulnerability to fatigue in the laboratory and in the workplace.实验室和工作场所中认知易疲劳的个体差异。
Prog Brain Res. 2011;190:145-53. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53817-8.00009-8.
8
Can a simple balance task be used to assess fitness for duty?简单的平衡任务能否用于评估履职能力?
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Mar;45 Suppl:74-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.09.030. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
9
Systematic interindividual differences in neurobehavioral impairment from sleep loss: evidence of trait-like differential vulnerability.睡眠剥夺导致神经行为损伤的个体间系统差异:特质性差异易感性的证据。
Sleep. 2004 May 1;27(3):423-33.
10
Interindividual variability in neurobehavioral response to sleep loss: A comprehensive review.个体间睡眠缺失导致神经行为反应的差异:全面综述。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Jun;89:29-48. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.03.017. Epub 2018 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Associating EEG functional networks and the effect of sleep deprivation as measured using psychomotor vigilance tests.关联 EEG 功能网络与使用精神运动警觉性测试测量的睡眠剥夺的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 14;14(1):27999. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78814-4.
2
The effects of psychological flexibility and night shifts on mental health and well-being in nurses.心理灵活性和轮班对护士心理健康和幸福感的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 14;19(11):e0313634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313634. eCollection 2024.
3
Circadian rhythm sleep loss impairs motor inhibition more than motor execution in continuous action.
昼夜节律睡眠缺失在连续动作中比运动执行更能损害运动抑制。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 12;14(1):18668. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69242-5.
4
The Relationship between Working Night Shifts and Depression among Nurses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.护士值夜班与抑郁之间的关系:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 24;11(7):937. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11070937.
5
Sleep loss suicidal ideation: the role of trait extraversion.睡眠不足与自杀意念:外向性特质的作用。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Oct 20;16:886836. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.886836. eCollection 2022.
6
Pros and cons of quick returns-a cross-sectional survey among Swedish nurses and nurse assistants.快速回报的利弊——瑞典护士和护士助理的横断面调查。
Ind Health. 2023 Sep 22;61(5):379-392. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2022-0033. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
7
Evaluation of call volume and negative emotions in emergency response system telecommunicators: a prospective, intensive longitudinal investigation.应急响应系统话务员的呼叫量与负面情绪评估:一项前瞻性、密集纵向调查
AIMS Public Health. 2022 Mar 28;9(2):403-414. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2022027. eCollection 2022.
8
Working around the Clock: Is a Person's Endogenous Circadian Timing for Optimal Neurobehavioral Functioning Inherently Task-Dependent?昼夜不停工作:人的内源性昼夜节律对于最佳神经行为功能而言本质上是否依赖于任务?
Clocks Sleep. 2022 Feb 11;4(1):23-36. doi: 10.3390/clockssleep4010005.
9
Genetic Markers of Differential Vulnerability to Sleep Loss in Adults.成人睡眠缺失易损性的遗传标志物。
Genes (Basel). 2021 Aug 26;12(9):1317. doi: 10.3390/genes12091317.
10
Raw scores on subjective sleepiness, fatigue, and vigor metrics consistently define resilience and vulnerability to sleep loss.在主观的困意、疲劳和活力指标上的原始分数,始终明确界定了对睡眠缺失的适应力和脆弱性。
Sleep. 2022 Jan 11;45(1). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsab228.