• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

修复复合树脂与酸蚀及激光辐照长石质陶瓷表面的剪切粘结强度。

Shear bond strength of repair composite resin to an acid-etched and a laser-irradiated feldspathic ceramic surface.

作者信息

Akyil Musa Samil, Yilmaz Asude, Karaalioğlu Osman F, Duymuş Zeynep Y

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Atatürk, Erzurum, Turkey.

出版信息

Photomed Laser Surg. 2010 Aug;28(4):539-45. doi: 10.1089/pho.2009.2586.

DOI:10.1089/pho.2009.2586
PMID:19852588
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of a repair composite resin to a feldspathic ceramic surface that had been either etched with 9.5% hydrofluoric acid (HFA), irradiated by an Er:YAG or Nd:YAG laser, or etched with 9.5% HFA after being irradiated by each laser type.

BACKGROUND DATA

New findings have shown that combined laser irradiation and acid etching of a ceramic surface can be used to roughen ceramic surfaces.

METHODS

Seventy-eight feldspathic ceramic discs were assigned to six surface treatment groups (n = 13): C, no treatment; HFA, 9.5% HFA etching; ER, Er:YAG laser irradiation; ND, Nd:YAG laser irradiation; ER + HFA, Er:YAG laser irradiation followed by HFA etching; ND + HFA, Nd:YAG laser irradiation followed by HFA etching. The surface of one disc from each treatment group was examined under a scanning electron microscope. After the surface treatments and silanization, a repair composite resin was applied to each disc using a commercial ceramic repair kit. Shear bond strength testing was then done after storing the specimens in distilled water for 24 h at 37 degrees C and thermocycling. Each ruptured specimen was examined under a stereoscopic light microscope.

RESULTS

The highest shear bond strength was found after HFA etching, and the lowest was found after Er:YAG laser irradiation. HFA etching also caused the most pronounced changes of all the surface treatments. When HFA was applied after either laser irradiation, the fissures and cracks were larger than those seen on the only laser-irradiated surfaces.

CONCLUSIONS

HFA etching is the most effective surface treatment for increasing the shear bond strength between a repair composite resin and a feldspathic ceramic surface. The shear bond strength after laser irradiation can be increased by HFA etching, but the strength of the bond is still smaller than that after HFA etching alone.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估修复复合树脂与经9.5%氢氟酸(HFA)蚀刻、铒钇铝石榴石(Er:YAG)或钕钇铝石榴石(Nd:YAG)激光照射,或每种激光照射后再用9.5% HFA蚀刻的长石质陶瓷表面之间的剪切粘结强度。

背景资料

新的研究结果表明,陶瓷表面的激光照射与酸蚀刻相结合可用于使陶瓷表面粗糙化。

方法

将78个长石质陶瓷圆盘分为六个表面处理组(n = 13):C组,未处理;HFA组,9.5% HFA蚀刻;ER组,Er:YAG激光照射;ND组,Nd:YAG激光照射;ER + HFA组,Er:YAG激光照射后进行HFA蚀刻;ND + HFA组,Nd:YAG激光照射后进行HFA蚀刻。在扫描电子显微镜下检查每个处理组的一个圆盘表面。表面处理和硅烷化后,使用商用陶瓷修复套件将修复复合树脂应用于每个圆盘。将标本在37℃蒸馏水中储存24小时并进行热循环后,进行剪切粘结强度测试。在立体光学显微镜下检查每个断裂的标本。

结果

HFA蚀刻后剪切粘结强度最高,Er:YAG激光照射后最低。HFA蚀刻在所有表面处理中引起的变化也最为明显。当在任何一种激光照射后应用HFA时,裂缝比仅激光照射表面上的裂缝更大。

结论

HFA蚀刻是提高修复复合树脂与长石质陶瓷表面之间剪切粘结强度的最有效表面处理方法。激光照射后的剪切粘结强度可通过HFA蚀刻提高,但粘结强度仍小于单独HFA蚀刻后的强度。

相似文献

1
Shear bond strength of repair composite resin to an acid-etched and a laser-irradiated feldspathic ceramic surface.修复复合树脂与酸蚀及激光辐照长石质陶瓷表面的剪切粘结强度。
Photomed Laser Surg. 2010 Aug;28(4):539-45. doi: 10.1089/pho.2009.2586.
2
Influence of aluminum oxide sandblasting associated with Nd:YAG or Er:YAG lasers on shear bond strength of a feldspathic ceramic to resin cements.氧化铝喷砂联合钕钇铝石榴石(Nd:YAG)或铒钇铝石榴石(Er:YAG)激光对长石质陶瓷与树脂水门汀之间剪切粘结强度的影响。
Photomed Laser Surg. 2010 Aug;28(4):471-5. doi: 10.1089/pho.2009.2528.
3
Shear bond strength between feldspathic CAD/CAM ceramic and human dentine for two adhesive cements.两种粘结剂用于长石质CAD/CAM陶瓷与人类牙本质之间的剪切粘结强度。
J Prosthodont. 2008 Jun;17(4):294-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00294.x. Epub 2008 Feb 5.
4
[Effects of pulsed Nd:YAG laser irradiation on shear bond strength of composite resin bonded to porcelain].[脉冲Nd:YAG激光照射对复合树脂与瓷粘结剪切强度的影响]
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2000 Dec;18(6):377-9.
5
Repair strength of etched vs silica-coated metal-ceramic and all-ceramic restorations.酸蚀与二氧化硅涂层金属陶瓷及全瓷修复体的修复强度
Oper Dent. 2000 May-Jun;25(3):209-15.
6
Effect of surface treatment on roughness and bond strength of a heat-pressed ceramic.表面处理对热压陶瓷粗糙度和粘结强度的影响
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Feb;99(2):123-30. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60028-1.
7
Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.影响金属和陶瓷托槽在不同陶瓷表面粘结强度的因素。
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Jun;32(3):274-80. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp098. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
8
Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to feldpathic ceramic after different etching and silanization regimens in dry and aged conditions.在干燥和老化条件下,不同蚀刻和硅烷化方案处理后,树脂水门汀与长石质陶瓷之间的微拉伸粘结强度。
Dent Mater. 2007 Nov;23(11):1323-31. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.011. Epub 2006 Dec 26.
9
The effect of different etching times of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel on the shear bond strength of high-leucite ceramics bonded to composite resin.酸蚀磷酸氟凝胶不同蚀刻时间对高白榴石陶瓷与复合树脂粘结剪切强度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Jul;98(1):17-23. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60033-X.
10
Bond strength durability of a resin composite on a reinforced ceramic using various repair systems.增强陶瓷上各种修复系统的树脂复合材料的粘结强度耐久性。
Dent Mater. 2009 Dec;25(12):1477-83. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.06.020. Epub 2009 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Laser Irradiation to Surfaces of Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Fabrication Resin Blocks Coated with a Silane Coupling Agent on Bond Strength between the Resin Blocks and Composite Resin.激光照射对涂有硅烷偶联剂的计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制作树脂块表面的影响及其对树脂块与复合树脂之间粘结强度的作用
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Dec 13;11(12):290. doi: 10.3390/dj11120290.
2
Influence of Sandblasting and Chemical Etching on Titanium 99.2-Dental Porcelain Bond Strength.喷砂和化学蚀刻对99.2%钛-牙科陶瓷结合强度的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Dec 24;15(1):116. doi: 10.3390/ma15010116.
3
In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of Different Surface Treatments of a Hybrid Ceramic on the Microtensile Bond Strength to a Luting Resin Cement.
混合陶瓷不同表面处理对与粘结树脂水门汀微拉伸粘结强度影响的体外评价
J Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Fall;10(4):297-303. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2019.48. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
4
Repair bond strength of composite resin to zirconia restorations after different thermal cycles.不同热循环后复合树脂与氧化锆修复体的修复粘结强度。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2019 Oct;11(5):297-304. doi: 10.4047/jap.2019.11.5.297. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
5
Effect of Er:YAG laser etching on topography, microstructure, compressive strength, and bond strength of a universal adhesive to calcium silicate cements.铒:钇铝石榴石激光蚀刻对通用粘结剂与硅酸钙水泥的润湿性、微观结构、抗压强度和粘结强度的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Feb;24(2):711-718. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02903-2. Epub 2019 May 24.
6
Effects of laser treatments on surface roughness of zirconium oxide ceramics.激光处理对氧化锆陶瓷表面粗糙度的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2018 Dec 19;18(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0688-y.
7
The Effect of Fractional CO2 Laser Irradiation on Shear Bond Strength of Resin Cement to Feldspathic Porcelain.二氧化碳分次激光照射对树脂水门汀与长石质瓷剪切粘结强度的影响
J Lasers Med Sci. 2018 Spring;9(2):101-106. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2018.20. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
8
Comparative study of the effect of Er:YAG and Er:Cr;YSGG lasers on porcelain: etching for the bonding of orthodontic brackets.Er:YAG 和 Er:Cr;YSGG 激光对瓷的粘结效果的对比研究:正畸托槽的粘结蚀刻。
Lasers Med Sci. 2018 Dec;33(9):1997-2005. doi: 10.1007/s10103-018-2573-y. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
9
Effect of surface preparation with Nd:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG lasers on the repair bond strength of lithium disilicate glass ceramic to a silorane-based composite resin.钕钇铝石榴石(Nd:YAG)激光和铬铒共掺钇稳定氧化锆(Er,Cr:YSGG)激光进行表面处理对二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷与硅烷类复合树脂修复粘结强度的影响。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2018 Winter;12(1):12-17. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2018.003. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
10
The effects of lasers on bond strength to ceramic materials: A systematic review and meta-analysis.激光对与陶瓷材料结合强度的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 2;13(1):e0190736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190736. eCollection 2018.