Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Department: Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, the Netherlands.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Oct 23;9:194. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-194.
The aim of the study was to develop quality indicators that can be used for quality assessment of registries of occupational diseases in relation to preventive policy on a national level. The research questions were: 1. Which indicators determine the quality of national registries of occupational diseases with respect to their ability to provide appropriate information for preventive policy? 2. What are the criteria that can distinguish low quality from high quality?
First, we performed a literature search to assess which output of registries can be considered appropriate for preventive policy and to develop a set of preliminary indicators and criteria. Second, final indicators and criteria were assessed and their content validity was tested in a Delphi study, for which experts from the 25 EU Member States were invited.
The literature search revealed two different types of information output to be appropriate for preventive policy: monitor and alert information. For the evaluation of the quality of the monitor and alert function we developed ten indicators and criteria. Sixteen of the twenty-five experts responded in the first round of the Delphi study, and eleven in the second round. Based on their comments, we assessed the final nine indicators: the completeness of the notification form, coverage of registration, guidelines or criteria for notification, education and training of reporting physicians, completeness of registration, statistical methods used, investigation of special cases, presentation of monitor information, and presentation of alert information. Except for the indicator "coverage of registration" for the alert function, all the indicators met the preset requirements of content validity.
We have developed quality indicators and criteria to evaluate registries for occupational diseases on the ability to provide appropriate information for preventive policy on a national level. Together, these indicators form a tool which can be used for quality improvement of registries of occupational diseases.
本研究旨在制定质量指标,以便能够根据国家预防政策对职业病登记处的质量进行评估。研究问题如下:1. 哪些指标能确定国家职业病登记处的质量,以评估其为预防政策提供适当信息的能力?2. 哪些标准可区分低质量和高质量?
首先,我们进行了文献检索,以评估登记处的哪些输出可被视为适合预防政策,并制定了一套初步的指标和标准。其次,我们在德尔菲研究中评估了最终的指标和标准,并对其内容有效性进行了测试,为此邀请了来自欧盟 25 个成员国的专家。
文献检索揭示了两种适合预防政策的不同信息输出类型:监测和警报信息。为了评估监测和警报功能的质量,我们制定了十个指标和标准。在德尔菲研究的第一轮中,25 名专家中有 16 名作出了回应,第二轮中有 11 名。根据他们的意见,我们评估了最终的九个指标:通知表的完整性、登记覆盖率、通知标准或准则、报告医生的教育和培训、登记的完整性、使用的统计方法、特殊病例的调查、监测信息的呈现以及警报信息的呈现。除了警报功能的“登记覆盖率”指标外,所有指标均符合内容有效性的预设要求。
我们制定了质量指标和标准,以评估国家层面上提供适合预防政策信息的职业病登记处的质量。这些指标共同构成了一个可用于提高职业病登记处质量的工具。