Ecologie des Systèmes Aquatiques, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Campus de la Plaine, CP 221, Boulevard du Triomphe, B-1050 Bruxelles, Belgium.
Sci Total Environ. 2009 Dec 20;408(2):365-72. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.09.042. Epub 2009 Oct 24.
We studied the prevalences of antimicrobial resistance (AR) and multiple antimicrobial resistance (MAR) among the fecal bacteria found in the rivers of a large watershed under strong anthropogenic pressures, the Seine river watershed (France). Two groups of fecal indicator bacteria, Escherichia coli and intestinal enterococci, were tested for their susceptibility to 16 and 10 antimicrobials respectively, using the disk diffusion method. We found that 42% of the 214 E. coli river isolates were AR (resistant to at least one antimicrobial) and 35% were MAR (resistant to at least two antimicrobials). Among the 148 intestinal enterococci isolates from rivers, 83% were AR and 49% were MAR. We also investigated the sources of AR fecal bacteria found in the rivers of the watershed. A total of 715 E. coli isolates and 476 intestinal enterococci isolates were collected in point sources (municipal and hospital wastewaters) and non-point sources (surface runoff and soil leaching waters from agricultural or forest areas). For E. coli, the prevalence of AR differed widely from source to source and ranked in this order: hospital wastewaters (71%)>municipal wastewaters (44%)>agricultural non-point sources (16%)>forest non-point sources (2%). The prevalence of MAR ranked similarly, and the same trend was observed for intestinal enterococci. The AR level of fecal bacteria in the sources was related to their expected exposure level to antimicrobials before their release into the environment. A MAR index was calculated for every source and a good discrimination between them was thus obtained. At the global scale of the Seine river watershed, domestic wastewaters seemed more likely to be the predominant source of the AR fecal bacteria found in the rivers. This was corroborated by the similarity of the MAR indices from river and municipal wastewater isolates for both fecal indicators.
我们研究了在受到强烈人为压力的大型流域——塞纳河流域(法国)的河流中发现的粪便细菌的抗生素耐药性(AR)和多重抗生素耐药性(MAR)流行率。使用圆盘扩散法分别测试了两组粪便指示菌——大肠杆菌和肠道肠球菌对 16 种和 10 种抗生素的敏感性。我们发现,214 株大肠杆菌河流水样中有 42%具有 AR(至少对一种抗生素耐药),35%具有 MAR(至少对两种抗生素耐药)。在来自河流的 148 株肠道肠球菌分离物中,83%具有 AR,49%具有 MAR。我们还研究了流域河流中发现的 AR 粪便细菌的来源。从点源(城市和医院污水)和非点源(农业或森林地区的地表径流和土壤淋溶水)共收集了 715 株大肠杆菌和 476 株肠道肠球菌。对于大肠杆菌,AR 的流行率因来源而异,按以下顺序排列:医院污水(71%)>城市污水(44%)>农业非点源(16%)>森林非点源(2%)。MAR 的流行率也相似,肠道肠球菌也存在同样的趋势。来源中粪便细菌的 AR 水平与其在释放到环境之前预期接触抗生素的水平有关。为每个来源计算了 MAR 指数,从而可以很好地区分它们。在塞纳河流域的全球范围内,生活污水似乎更有可能是河流中发现的 AR 粪便细菌的主要来源。这与粪便指示菌的河流和城市污水分离物的 MAR 指数相似得到了证实。